• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Geriatric fracture center: a multidisciplinary treatment approach for older patients with a hip fracture improved quality of clinical care and short-term treatment outcomes.老年骨折中心:一种针对老年髋部骨折患者的多学科治疗方法改善了临床护理质量和短期治疗效果。
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2012 Jun;3(2):59-67. doi: 10.1177/2151458512444288.
2
[Multidisciplinary integrated care pathway for elderly patients with hip fractures: implementation results from Centre for Geriatric Traumatology, Almelo, The Netherlands].老年髋部骨折患者的多学科综合护理路径:荷兰阿尔梅勒老年创伤中心的实施结果
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155(26):A3197.
3
Impact of a comanaged Geriatric Fracture Center on short-term hip fracture outcomes.共同管理的老年骨折中心对髋部骨折短期预后的影响。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Oct 12;169(18):1712-7. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.321.
4
Complications during hospitalization and risk factors in elderly patients with hip fracture following integrated orthogeriatric treatment.老年髋部骨折患者综合老年骨科治疗后的住院并发症及危险因素
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Apr;137(4):507-515. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2646-6. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
5
The consistency of care for older patients with a hip fracture: are the results of the integrated orthogeriatric treatment model of the Centre of Geriatric Traumatology consistent 10 years after implementation?老年髋部骨折患者的治疗一致性:老年创伤中心综合骨科-老年科治疗模式实施 10 年后的结果是否一致?
Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Nov 19;13(1):131. doi: 10.1007/s11657-018-0550-5.
6
The implementation of a Geriatric Fracture Centre for hip fractures to reduce mortality and morbidity: an observational study.实施老年骨折中心治疗髋部骨折以降低死亡率和发病率:一项观察性研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Dec;139(12):1705-1712. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03229-0. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
7
Impact of an orthogeriatric collaborative care model for older adults with hip fracture in a community hospital setting.社区医院中老年髋部骨折患者实施骨科老年病协作护理模式的效果。
Can J Surg. 2021 Mar 26;64(2):E211-E217. doi: 10.1503/cjs.001720.
8
Improved 1-year mortality in elderly patients with a hip fracture following integrated orthogeriatric treatment.综合老年骨科治疗后老年髋部骨折患者1年死亡率降低。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Jan;28(1):269-277. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3711-7. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
9
Reducing delirium after hip fracture: a randomized trial.降低髋部骨折后谵妄发生率:一项随机试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 May;49(5):516-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49108.x.
10
Multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation improves the long-term functional status of geriatric hip-fracture patients.多学科住院康复可改善老年髋部骨折患者的长期功能状态。
Eur J Med Res. 2020 Aug 10;25(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40001-020-00433-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperative identification of low-risk patients for major complications after acute hip fracture surgery in geriatric patients: an observational cohort study.老年患者急性髋部骨折手术后主要并发症低风险患者的术前识别:一项观察性队列研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 4;26(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08720-x.
2
Defining optimal orthogeriatric hip fracture care: a delphi consensus approach.定义最佳老年髋部骨折护理:德尔菲共识法
Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 Apr;16(2):551-561. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01156-5. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
3
Effects of Protocol-driven Care by Internists on Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hip Fracture Surgery Patients: An Interrupted Time Series Study Using a Nationwide Inpatient Database.内科医生的协议驱动护理对髋部骨折手术患者临床实践指南依从性的影响:一项使用全国住院患者数据库的中断时间序列研究。
Intern Med. 2025 Jul 15;64(14):2124-2135. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.4358-24. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Geriatric Fracture Center (GFC) concept: a prospective multicentre cohort study.老年骨折中心(GFC)概念的成本效益分析:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 2;13(11):e072744. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072744.
5
Do we understand each other when we develop and implement hip fracture models of care? A systematic review with narrative synthesis.当我们开发和实施髋部骨折护理模型时,我们是否理解彼此?系统评价与叙述性综合。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Sep;12(Suppl 2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002273.
6
Perception of Goals and Expected Outcomes in Older Hip Fracture Patients and Their Medical Staff: A Cross Sectional Study.老年髋部骨折患者及其医护人员对目标和预期结果的认知:一项横断面研究。
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2023 Sep 22;14:21514593231202735. doi: 10.1177/21514593231202735. eCollection 2023.
7
In-Hospital Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Fragility Fractures of the Lumbar Spine, Thoracic Spine, and Pelvic Ring: A Comparison of Data before and after Certification as a DGU Geriatric Trauma Centre.住院患者腰椎、胸椎和骨盆环脆性骨折的临床转归:通过认证前后数据的比较,评估德国创伤外科学会老年创伤中心的资质。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Nov 3;57(11):1197. doi: 10.3390/medicina57111197.
8
Effects of Orthogeriatric Care Models on Outcomes of Hip Fracture Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.老年骨科护理模式对髋部骨折患者结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2022 Feb;110(2):162-184. doi: 10.1007/s00223-021-00913-5. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
9
Care of Geriatric Patients with Lumbar Spine, Pelvic, and Acetabular Fractures before and after Certification as a Geriatric Trauma Center DGU: A Retrospective Cohort Study.老年创伤中心认证前后老年腰椎、骨盆和髋臼骨折患者的护理:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jul 31;57(8):794. doi: 10.3390/medicina57080794.
10
Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study.老年髋部骨折患者在骨科骨折中心与常规治疗后:有哪些获益?一项大型国际前瞻性多中心研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 10;11(5):e039960. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039960.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of an organized geriatric fracture program to United States government data.一个有组织的老年骨折项目与美国政府数据的比较。
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2010 Sep;1(1):15-21. doi: 10.1177/2151458510382231.
2
Delirium risk screening and haloperidol prophylaxis program in hip fracture patients is a helpful tool in identifying high-risk patients, but does not reduce the incidence of delirium.髋部骨折患者的谵妄风险筛查和氟哌啶醇预防方案是识别高危患者的有用工具,但不能降低谵妄的发生率。
BMC Geriatr. 2011 Aug 11;11:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-11-39.
3
Optimal setting and care organization in the management of older adults with hip fracture.老年人髋部骨折管理中的最佳设置和护理组织。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 Jun;47(2):281-96. Epub 2011 May 10.
4
Prognostic prediction in patients with hip fracture: risk factors predicting difficulties with discharge to own home.髋部骨折患者的预后预测:预测出院后返回家中的困难的危险因素。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2011 Jun;12(2):77-80. doi: 10.1007/s10195-011-0138-y. Epub 2011 May 4.
5
Secular trends in the incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures.髋部和其他骨质疏松性骨折发病率的长期变化趋势。
Osteoporos Int. 2011 May;22(5):1277-88. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1601-6. Epub 2011 Apr 2.
6
The value of an organized fracture program for the elderly: early results.老年人骨折管理项目的价值:早期结果。
J Orthop Trauma. 2011 Apr;25(4):233-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181e5e901.
7
Ortho-geriatric service--a literature review comparing different models.矫形老年医学服务——不同模式的文献综述比较。
Osteoporos Int. 2010 Dec;21(Suppl 4):S637-46. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1396-x. Epub 2010 Nov 6.
8
Geriatric hip fracture clinical pathway: the Hong Kong experience.老年髋部骨折临床路径:香港经验。
Osteoporos Int. 2010 Dec;21(Suppl 4):S627-36. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1387-y. Epub 2010 Nov 6.
9
Delirium often not recognized or treated despite serious long-term consequences.尽管存在严重的长期后果,但谵妄往往未被识别或治疗。
JAMA. 2010 Jul 28;304(4):389-90, 395. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.965.
10
[If delirium is not monitored it will often be not detected].如果不监测谵妄,通常就无法发现。
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2010 Feb;45(2):106-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248145. Epub 2010 Feb 12.

老年骨折中心:一种针对老年髋部骨折患者的多学科治疗方法改善了临床护理质量和短期治疗效果。

Geriatric fracture center: a multidisciplinary treatment approach for older patients with a hip fracture improved quality of clinical care and short-term treatment outcomes.

作者信息

Folbert E C Ellis, Smit Ruth S, van der Velde Detlef, Regtuijt E M Marlies, Klaren M Hester, Hegeman J H Han

机构信息

Department of Surgery, ZGT Almelo, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2012 Jun;3(2):59-67. doi: 10.1177/2151458512444288.

DOI:10.1177/2151458512444288
PMID:23569698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3598408/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Since April 1, 2008, patients aged ≥65 years presenting with a hip fracture at Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo (ZGT-A), The Netherlands, have been admitted to the geriatric fracture center (GFC) and treated according to the multidisciplinary treatment approach. The objective of this study was to evaluate how implementation of the treatment approach has influenced the quality of care given to older patients with hip fracture.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study with historical control group.

METHOD

Two groups of patients with hip fracture were compared, 1 group was treated according to the new multidisciplinary treatment approach in 2009-2010, and the other group received the usual treatment in 2007-2008. The number of readmissions within 30 days after discharge was compared, and an analysis was carried out regarding the number of complications, the number of consultations with various specialists and with the geriatrician, and the duration of hospital stay.

RESULTS

In all, 140 patients from 2009 to 2010 group and 90 patients from 2007 to 2008 group were included. In 2009-2010 group, the number of readmissions within 30 days dropped by 11 percentage points (P = .001). The incidence of the number of complications decreased with a median of 1 compared with 2007-2008 (P = .017) group. Delirium was diagnosed to be 6 percentage points more frequent. The median number of consultations with various specialists per patient decreased by 1 percentage point as a result of geriatrician cotreatment (P = .002). The median duration of hospital stay was 1 day shorter than that in 2007-2008 group.

CONCLUSION

The use of the multidisciplinary treatment approach led to a significant reduction in the number of readmissions within 30 days after discharge. It appears to be associated with improved short-term treatment outcomes for older patients with a hip fracture.

摘要

目的

自2008年4月1日起,荷兰阿尔梅洛市特温特医院集团(ZGT - A)收治的65岁及以上髋部骨折患者被收入老年骨折中心(GFC),并按照多学科治疗方法进行治疗。本研究的目的是评估该治疗方法的实施对老年髋部骨折患者护理质量的影响。

设计

设有历史对照组的前瞻性队列研究。

方法

比较两组髋部骨折患者,一组在2009 - 2010年按照新的多学科治疗方法进行治疗,另一组在2007 - 2008年接受常规治疗。比较出院后30天内的再入院人数,并对并发症数量、与各专科医生和老年病医生的会诊次数以及住院时间进行分析。

结果

总共纳入了2009至2010年组的140例患者和2007至2008年组的90例患者。在2009 - 2010年组中,30天内的再入院人数下降了11个百分点(P = .001)。并发症数量的发生率与2007 - 2008年组相比,中位数减少了1例(P = .017)。谵妄的诊断频率高出6个百分点。由于老年病医生共同治疗,每位患者与各专科医生的会诊中位数减少了1个百分点(P = .002)。住院时间中位数比2007 - 2008年组短1天。

结论

多学科治疗方法的使用导致出院后30天内再入院人数显著减少。这似乎与老年髋部骨折患者短期治疗效果的改善有关。