Laboratory for Experimental Psychopathology, Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Apr 4;7:119. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00119. eCollection 2013.
Recently, researchers have investigated the causal nature of attentional bias for threat (AB) in the maintenance of anxiety disorders by experimentally manipulating it. They found that training anxious individuals to attend to non-threat stimuli reduces AB, which, in turn, reduces anxiety. This effect supports the hypothesis that AB can causally impact the maintenance of anxiety. At a fundamental level, however, uncertainty still abounds regarding the nature of the processes that mediate this effect. In the present paper, we propose that two contrasting approaches may be derived from theoretical accounts of AB. According to a first class of models, called the "valence-specific bias" models, modifying AB requires the modification of valence-specific attentional selectivity. According to a second class of models, called the "attention control models," modifying AB requires the modification of attention control, driven by the recruitment of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. We formulate a series of specific predictions, to provide suggestions to trial these two approaches one against the other. This knowledge is critical for understanding the mechanisms of AB in anxiety disorders, which bares important clinical implications.
最近,研究人员通过实验操纵注意力偏向威胁(AB)来研究其在维持焦虑障碍中的因果性质。他们发现,训练焦虑个体注意非威胁刺激可以减少 AB,进而减轻焦虑。这一效应支持了 AB 可以因果性地影响焦虑维持的假设。然而,在根本层面上,对于介导这种效应的过程的性质,仍然存在很大的不确定性。在本文中,我们提出,根据 AB 的理论解释,可以推导出两种截然不同的方法。根据第一类模型,称为“效价特异性偏向”模型,改变 AB 需要改变效价特异性注意力选择性。根据第二类模型,称为“注意控制模型”,改变 AB 需要通过招募背外侧前额叶皮层来改变注意控制。我们提出了一系列具体的预测,为这两种方法相互竞争提供了建议。这一知识对于理解焦虑障碍中 AB 的机制至关重要,具有重要的临床意义。