BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Apr 11;13:172. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-172.
Diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae in adults and adolescents is hampered by a lack of rapid and standardized tests for detection.
CAP patients from 12 teaching hospitals were prospectively and consecutively recruited. Basic and clinical information, throat swabs and paired sera were collected. Mycoplasma pneumoniae was detected by IgG and IgM antibody tests, fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction (FQ-PCR) and culture. A comparative study of the diagnostic values of three methods, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was conducted. A fourfold or greater increase of IgG antibody titers of paired sera was set as the diagnostic "gold standard".
One hundred and twenty-five CAP patients (52.8% males, median age 47 years, range 14-85) were enrolled. Twenty-seven (21.6%) patients were diagnosed with acute Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections by the "gold standard". Specificity values of all three methods were around 90%. An increasing trend of sensitivity, positive predictive value and PLR was found, with the lowest in IgM testing (7.4%, 28.6% and 1.45), intermediate in FQ-PCR (40.7%, 50% and 3.63), and highest in culture (55.6%, 75% and 10.9).
In the defined group of patients, there was a good agreement between positive rate of MP cultivation of throat swabs and acute M. pneumoniae infection (PLR of 10.9). Since the sensitivity is low in all of the evaluated methods, the logical approach would be to incorporate PCR, culture and serological tests for optimum diagnosis of acute Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in adults and adolescents.
成人和青少年社区获得性肺炎(CAP)由肺炎支原体引起,缺乏快速和标准化的检测方法,诊断受到阻碍。
从 12 所教学医院前瞻性连续招募 CAP 患者。收集基本和临床信息、咽拭子和配对血清。通过 IgG 和 IgM 抗体检测、荧光定量聚合酶链反应(FQ-PCR)和培养检测肺炎支原体。对三种方法的诊断价值(包括敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及阳性似然比[PLR])进行了比较研究。将配对血清 IgG 抗体滴度增加四倍或以上作为诊断的“金标准”。
共纳入 125 例 CAP 患者(52.8%为男性,中位年龄 47 岁,范围 14-85 岁)。27 例(21.6%)患者通过“金标准”诊断为急性肺炎支原体感染。三种方法的特异性均在 90%左右。敏感性、阳性预测值和 PLR呈上升趋势,IgM 检测最低(7.4%、28.6%和 1.45),FQ-PCR 检测次之(40.7%、50%和 3.63),培养检测最高(55.6%、75%和 10.9)。
在定义的患者群体中,咽拭子肺炎支原体培养的阳性率与急性肺炎支原体感染之间存在良好的一致性(PLR 为 10.9)。由于所有评估方法的敏感性均较低,因此逻辑上的方法是将 PCR、培养和血清学检测相结合,以优化成人和青少年急性肺炎支原体感染的诊断。