von Baum Heike, Welte Tobias, Marre Reinhard, Suttorp Norbert, Lück Christian, Ewig Santiago
Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
BMC Infect Dis. 2009 May 13;9:62. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-62.
Currently, broad empiric antimicrobial treatment including atypical coverage is recommended for patients with mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Therefore, the relative impact of each atypical pathogen, particularly Mycoplasma pneumoniae deserves renewed attention.
Based on prospective data from 4532 patients with CAP included in the German CAP-Competence Network (CAPNETZ), we studied the incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcome of patients with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP). The diagnosis of MPP was based on a positive PCR from respiratory samples and/or a positive IgM-titer from an acute phase serum sample.
307 patients (6.8%) had definite MPP (148 with positive PCR, 204 with positive IgM, 46 with positive PCR and IgM). Compared to patients with other definite and unknown etiologies, patients with MPP were significantly younger (41 +/- 16 versus 62 +/- 17 and 61 +/- 18 years), had fewer co-morbidities, presented with a less severe disease, showed a lower inflammatory response in terms of leukocyte counts (median 8850 versus 13200 and 11000 microL) and CRP values (60 versus 173 and 73 mg/L), and had better outcomes, including a shorter length of hospitalization (9 +/- 5 versus 14 +/- 11 and 12 +/- 9 days), fewer patients requiring mechanical ventilation (0.3 versus 4.5 and 2.1%), and a minimal mortality (0.7 versus 8.7 and 6.5%).
In this large series of patients with definite MPP according to very strict criteria, MPP appears as a condition with a high incidence, quite specific clinical presentation, and a largely benign course. In view of a widely favorable clinical outcome, recent recommendations including regular coverage of atypical pathogens in patients with mild to moderate CAP might be reconsidered for patients in Germany as well as in other countries with comparable epidemiological settings.
目前,对于轻至中度社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者,推荐进行包括非典型病原体覆盖的广泛经验性抗菌治疗。因此,每种非典型病原体的相对影响,尤其是肺炎支原体,值得重新关注。
基于德国CAP-能力网络(CAPNETZ)纳入的4532例CAP患者的前瞻性数据,我们研究了肺炎支原体肺炎(MPP)患者的发病率、临床特征和结局。MPP的诊断基于呼吸道样本PCR阳性和/或急性期血清样本IgM滴度阳性。
307例患者(6.8%)确诊为MPP(148例PCR阳性,204例IgM阳性,46例PCR和IgM均阳性)。与其他明确病因和病因不明的患者相比,MPP患者明显更年轻(41±16岁 vs 62±17岁和61±18岁),合并症更少,疾病较轻,白细胞计数(中位数8850 vs 13200和11000/μL)和CRP值(60 vs 173和73 mg/L)方面的炎症反应较低,结局更好,包括住院时间更短(9±5天 vs 14±11天和12±9天),需要机械通气的患者更少(0.3% vs 4.5%和2.1%),死亡率极低(0.7% vs 8.7%和6.5%)。
在这一系列根据非常严格标准确诊的MPP患者中,MPP表现为一种发病率高、临床表现相当特异且病程基本良性的疾病。鉴于临床结局普遍良好,对于德国以及其他具有类似流行病学背景的国家的患者,近期关于在轻至中度CAP患者中常规覆盖非典型病原体的建议可能需要重新考虑。