Caprilli R, Carratù R, Babbini M
Am J Dig Dis. 1975 Feb;20(2):115-20. doi: 10.1007/BF01072336.
A double-blind therapeutic trial of azathioprine in 20 patients with acute proctocolitis was performed over a 3-month period. Azathioprine was compared with sulfasalazine in patients paired and treated in a sequential order. Clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, biopsy, and radiologic data were assessed by semiquantitative criteria. No significant difference in the effect of the drugs was observed. Both azathioprine and sulfasalazine produce significant improvement in clinical symptoms, some laboratory findings (ESR, serum iron), and endoscopic and biopsy findings (P smaller than 0.05). Radiologic improvement was less evident (P smaller than 0.10). On the overall final evaluation of the trial, 14 patients were improved, and 6 remained stationary or worsened (P smaller than 0.10). This short-term trial confirms previous uncontrolled experiences of one of the authors on larger series of patients.
在3个月的时间里,对20例急性直肠结肠炎患者进行了硫唑嘌呤双盲治疗试验。将硫唑嘌呤与柳氮磺胺吡啶进行比较,患者配对并按顺序接受治疗。通过半定量标准评估临床、实验室、内镜、活检和放射学数据。未观察到药物疗效的显著差异。硫唑嘌呤和柳氮磺胺吡啶在临床症状、一些实验室检查结果(血沉、血清铁)以及内镜和活检结果方面均有显著改善(P<0.05)。放射学改善不太明显(P<0.10)。在试验的总体最终评估中,14例患者病情改善,6例患者病情无变化或恶化(P<0.10)。这项短期试验证实了作者之一之前在更多患者系列上的非对照经验。