Ali Akbar, Aydin Cihan, Gildemeister Reinhold, Romano Keith P, Cao Hong, Ozen Ayşegül, Soumana Djade, Newton Alicia, Petropoulos Christos J, Huang Wei, Schiffer Celia A
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School , Worcester, Massachusetts 01605, United States.
ACS Chem Biol. 2013 Jul 19;8(7):1469-78. doi: 10.1021/cb400100g. Epub 2013 May 1.
The hepatitis C virus (HCV) infects an estimated 150 million people worldwide and is the major cause of viral hepatitis, cirrhosis, and liver cancer. The available antiviral therapies, which include PEGylated interferon, ribavirin, and one of the HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitors telaprevir or boceprevir, are ineffective for some patients and cause severe side effects. More potent NS3/4A protease inhibitors are in clinical development, but the long-term effectiveness of these drugs is challenged by the development of drug resistance. Here, we investigated the role of macrocycles in the susceptibility of NS3/4A protease inhibitors to drug resistance in asunaprevir, danoprevir, vaniprevir, and MK-5172, with similar core structures but varied P2 moieties and macrocyclizations. Linear and macrocyclic analogues of these drugs were designed, synthesized, and tested against wild-type and drug-resistant variants R155K, V36M/R155K, A156T, and D168A in enzymatic and antiviral assays. Macrocyclic inhibitors were generally more potent, but the location of the macrocycle was critical for retaining activity against drug-resistant variants: the P1-P3 macrocyclic inhibitors were less susceptible to drug resistance than the linear and P2-P4 macrocyclic analogues. In addition, the heterocyclic moiety at P2 largely determined the inhibitor resistance profile, susceptibility to drug resistance, and the extent of modulation by the helicase domain. Our findings suggest that to design robust inhibitors that retain potency to drug-resistant NS3/4A protease variants, inhibitors should combine P1-P3 macrocycles with flexible P2 moieties that optimally contact with the invariable catalytic triad of this enzyme.
丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)在全球约感染1.5亿人,是病毒性肝炎、肝硬化和肝癌的主要病因。现有的抗病毒疗法,包括聚乙二醇化干扰素、利巴韦林以及HCV NS3/4A蛋白酶抑制剂特拉匹韦或博赛匹韦中的一种,对一些患者无效且会引起严重副作用。更有效的NS3/4A蛋白酶抑制剂正在进行临床开发,但这些药物的长期有效性受到耐药性发展的挑战。在此,我们研究了大环在asunaprevir、danoprevir、vaniprevir和MK-5172中NS3/4A蛋白酶抑制剂耐药性敏感性中的作用,这些药物具有相似的核心结构,但P2部分和大环化不同。设计、合成了这些药物的线性和大环类似物,并在酶促和抗病毒试验中针对野生型和耐药变体R155K、V36M/R155K、A156T和D168A进行了测试。大环抑制剂通常更有效,但大环的位置对于保持对耐药变体的活性至关重要:P1-P3大环抑制剂比线性和P2-P4大环类似物对耐药性更不敏感。此外,P2处的杂环部分在很大程度上决定了抑制剂的耐药谱、对耐药性的敏感性以及解旋酶结构域的调节程度。我们的研究结果表明,为了设计对耐药NS3/4A蛋白酶变体保持效力的强效抑制剂,抑制剂应将P1-P3大环与能与该酶不变的催化三联体最佳接触的柔性P2部分相结合。