• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《患者自评腕关节评估问卷》丹麦语版本的翻译与验证

Translation and validation of the Danish version of the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire.

作者信息

Schønnemann Jesper O, Hansen Torben B, Søballe Kjeld

机构信息

Orthopedic Research Unit, Hospital Unit West , Holstebro , Denmark.

出版信息

J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013 Dec;47(6):489-92. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2013.787934. Epub 2013 Apr 18.

DOI:10.3109/2000656X.2013.787934
PMID:23596992
Abstract

The need for validated outcome measures is increasing. The purpose is to translate and validate the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) in Danish. Translation was done by an expert panel followed by evaluation of a lay panel and a field test on 10 patients. Sixty patients with wrist fractures were included. Both lay panel comments and field test revealed issues not dealt with by the expert panel, and a final version of the Danish PRWE was made. The validation process then continued and reliability results. were presented as Cronbach's alpha = 0.94, describing the homogeneity and the intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.88 and difference of mean = 5.7 (CI = 1.12-10.37, p = 0.017), describing the concordance of the results. Convergent validity at first and last control was for pain, 0.51 and 0.46, and physical mobility, 0.56 and 0.64, respectively, describing the correlation with a gold standard questionnaire. A minor floor effect was noticed, but not enough to indicate a lack of sensitivity of the PRWE. Effect size, the ability to measure sensitivity to change, was 0.62, also described as responsiveness. The translation resulted in a questionnaire that represents correct easy-understandable Danish. It is concluded that the modified Danish version is a valid questionnaire for patients with wrist fractures.

摘要

对经过验证的结果测量指标的需求日益增加。目的是将患者自评腕关节评估量表(PRWE)翻译成丹麦语并进行验证。由一个专家小组进行翻译,随后由一个外行小组进行评估,并对10名患者进行现场测试。纳入了60名腕部骨折患者。外行小组的意见和现场测试都揭示了专家小组未处理的问题,于是形成了丹麦语PRWE的最终版本。然后继续进行验证过程并给出可靠性结果。克朗巴哈系数α = 0.94,描述了同质性;组内相关系数 = 0.88,平均差异 = 5.7(置信区间 = 1.12 - 10.37,p = 0.017),描述了结果的一致性。首次和末次对照时的收敛效度,疼痛方面分别为0.51和0.46,身体活动方面分别为0.56和0.64,描述了与金标准问卷的相关性。发现有轻微的地板效应,但不足以表明PRWE缺乏敏感性。效应大小,即测量对变化敏感性的能力,为0.62,也称为反应性。翻译后的问卷能用正确且易懂的丹麦语表述。结论是,修改后的丹麦语版本对于腕部骨折患者是一个有效的问卷。

相似文献

1
Translation and validation of the Danish version of the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire.《患者自评腕关节评估问卷》丹麦语版本的翻译与验证
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013 Dec;47(6):489-92. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2013.787934. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
2
Evaluation of the Korean version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation.患者自评腕关节评估量表的韩文版评估。
J Hand Ther. 2013 Jul-Sep;26(3):238-43; quiz 244. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
3
Construct validity of the Chinese version of the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation Questionnaire (PRWE-Hong Kong Version).患者自评腕关节评估问卷中文版(香港版)的结构效度。
J Hand Ther. 2006 Jan-Mar;19(1):18-26, quiz 27. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2005.10.003.
4
Translation and Validation of the Finnish Version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation Questionnaire (PRWE) in Patients with Acute Distal Radius Fracture.急性桡骨远端骨折患者的患者自评腕关节评估问卷(PRWE)芬兰语版本的翻译与验证
Scand J Surg. 2016 Sep;105(3):204-10. doi: 10.1177/1457496915613649. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
5
Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation.日本版患者自评腕关节评估量表的信度、效度及反应度
J Orthop Sci. 2010 Jul;15(4):509-17. doi: 10.1007/s00776-010-1477-x. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
6
Reliability and validity of the Danish version of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire in patients with fractured wrists.丹麦版手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍问卷在腕部骨折患者中的信度和效度
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2011 Feb;45(1):35-9. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2011.554708.
7
Reliability and validity of the German version of "the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)" as an outcome measure of wrist pain and disability in patients with acute distal radius fractures.德文版“患者自评腕关节评估(PRWE)”作为急性桡骨远端骨折患者腕部疼痛和功能障碍的疗效指标的可靠性和有效性。
J Hand Ther. 2008 Oct-Dec;21(4):366-76. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2008.03.002. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
8
Measuring outcome after wrist injury: translation and validation of the Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE-Swe).测量腕部损伤后的结果:患者自评腕部评估(PRWE-Swe)瑞典语版本的翻译与验证。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Jul 22;12:171. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-171.
9
Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius.对瑞典语版患者自评腕关节评估结果问卷的评估:在99例桡骨远端骨折康复患者中具有良好的反应性、效度和信度。
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2009;43(2):94-101. doi: 10.1080/02844310902734598.
10
Brazilian version of the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE-BR): Cross-cultural adaptation, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity.巴西版患者自评腕关节评估量表(PRWE-BR):跨文化调适、内部一致性、重测信度及结构效度
J Hand Ther. 2015 Jan-Mar;28(1):69-75; quiz 76. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric qualities of the patient rated Wrist/Hand evaluation (PRWHE) in dutch primary care patients with wrist complaints.荷兰初级保健中腕部抱怨患者的患者评定腕/手评估(PRWHE)的心理测量学特性。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Nov 4;23(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01885-7.
2
Cross‑cultural adaptation, construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Thai version of the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (Thai PRWHE).泰文版患者腕/手部评估量表(Thai PRWHE)的跨文化调适、结构效度、信度和反应度。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Jun;30(6):1793-1802. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02760-1. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
3
The reliability of remembered pre-operative patient-rated wrist and hand evaluation (PRWHE) scores.
术前患者自评手腕和手部评估(PRWHE)评分的可靠性。
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2018 Dec 6;10(4):7682. doi: 10.4081/or.2018.7682.
4
Disability and return to work after MRI on suspicion of scaphoid fracture: Influence of MRI pathology and occupational mechanical exposures.怀疑舟状骨骨折行 MRI 检查后的残疾和重返工作:MRI 病理和职业机械暴露的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 4;13(6):e0197978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197978. eCollection 2018.
5
Are the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire used in distal radial fractures truly valid and reliable?用于桡骨远端骨折的患者自评腕关节评估(PRWE)和上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)问卷是否真的有效且可靠?
Bone Joint Res. 2018 Jan;7(1):36-45. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0081.R1.
6
Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Patient Rated Wris t Evaluation.患者自评腕关节评估波斯语版本的心理测量属性
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2017 Jul;5(4):243-249.
7
The Spanish version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation outcome measure: cross-cultural adaptation process, reliability, measurement error and construct validity.患者自评腕关节评估结果测量工具的西班牙语版本:跨文化调适过程、信度、测量误差与结构效度
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Aug 24;15(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0745-2.
8
Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation: Spanish Version and Evaluation of Its Psychometric Properties in Patients with Acute Distal Radius Fracture.患者自评腕关节评估:西班牙语版本及其在急性桡骨远端骨折患者中的心理测量学特性评估
J Wrist Surg. 2017 Aug;6(3):216-219. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1599127. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
9
Are validated outcome measures used in distal radial fractures truly valid? A critical assessment using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.用于桡骨远端骨折的经过验证的结局指标真的有效吗?使用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)清单进行的批判性评估。
Bone Joint Res. 2016 Apr;5(4):153-61. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.54.2000462.