商环与器械法成人男性包皮环切术的随机对照有效性研究：乌干达西南部研究。
Shang Ring versus forceps-guided adult male circumcision: a randomized, controlled effectiveness study in southwestern Uganda.
机构信息
*Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda; †Good Shepherd Hospital, Siteki, Swaziland; ‡North West Deanery, Manchester, UK; §Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, Mbarara, Uganda; and ‖Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Global Health, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
出版信息
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013 Oct 1;64(2):130-3. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182965d67.
Abstract
Adult male circumcision (AMC) reduces HIV transmission, but uptake is limited in part by current surgical methods. We randomized HIV-uninfected men (n = 138) to receive Shang Ring (SR)- or forceps-guided AMC from a locally trained surgeon. In as-treated analyses, more SR procedures were completed within 10 minutes (79% versus 0%, P < 0.01) and more subjects reported high satisfaction (77% versus 58%, P = 0.03). Healing time and pain scores were similar, though minor complication rates were higher in SR subjects (56% versus 24%, P < 0.01). SR circumcision is a rapid and acceptable method of AMC and should be further evaluated to increase uptake of AMC.
摘要
成人男性环切术（AMC）可降低 HIV 传播风险，但由于目前的手术方法，其接受程度有限。我们将未感染 HIV 的男性（n=138）随机分配接受 Shang Ring（SR）或钳子引导的 AMC，由当地培训的外科医生进行操作。在实际治疗分析中，更多的 SR 手术在 10 分钟内完成（79%比 0%，P<0.01），更多的受试者报告高度满意（77%比 58%，P=0.03）。愈合时间和疼痛评分相似，但 SR 组的轻微并发症发生率较高（56%比 24%，P<0.01）。SR 环切术是一种快速且可接受的 AMC 方法，应该进一步评估以增加 AMC 的接受程度。
相似文献
1
Shang Ring versus forceps-guided adult male circumcision: a randomized, controlled effectiveness study in southwestern Uganda.商环与器械法成人男性包皮环切术的随机对照有效性研究：乌干达西南部研究。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013 Oct 1;64(2):130-3. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182965d67.
2
Randomized trial of the Shang Ring for adult male circumcision with removal at one to three weeks: delayed removal leads to detachment.一项关于 Shang Ring 用于成人男性包皮环切术的随机试验：在 1 至 3 周时进行延迟移除，会导致脱落。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012 Jul 1;60(3):e82-9. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31824ea1f2.
3
Randomized controlled trial of the shang ring versus conventional surgical techniques for adult male circumcision: safety and acceptability.商环与传统手术方法用于成人男性包皮环切术的随机对照试验：安全性和可接受性。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014 Apr 1;65(4):447-55. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000061.
4
The acceptability and safety of the Shang Ring for adult male circumcision in Rakai, Uganda.尚环用于乌干达拉凯成人男性包皮环切术的可接受性和安全性。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013 Aug 15;63(5):617-21. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182968dda.
5
[Clinical studies of shang ring male circumcision in China and Africa].[中国和非洲商环包皮环切术的临床研究]
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2014 Apr;20(4):291-8.
6
Proper surgical training and grading of complications for Shang Ring circumcision are necessary.对商环包皮环切术进行适当的外科培训和并发症分级是必要的。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013 Oct 1;64(2):e11. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182a333ad.
7
Authors' reply: Proper surgical training and grading of complications for Shang Ring circumcision are necessary.作者回复：商环包皮环切术需要适当的手术培训及并发症分级。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013 Oct 1;64(2):e12. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182a6db6c.
8
How to choose appropriate ring size for Shang Ring male circumcision.如何选择合适的 Shang Ring 男性环切戒指尺寸。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012 Dec 15;61(5):606-9. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318273aec9.
9
A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex™ Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe.在津巴布韦进行的一项II期随机对照试验，比较PrePex™器械与镊子引导下手术环切术的安全性、手术时间和成本。
PLoS One. 2016 May 26;11(5):e0156220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156220. eCollection 2016.
10
[Progress in the clinical studies of male circumcision using the Shang Ring].[商环包皮环切术的临床研究进展]
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2011 Mar;17(3):195-202.
引用本文的文献
1
Wound healing rates and wound problems of conventional circumcision compared with ring circumcision: A meta-analysis.传统环切术与环扎术的愈合率和伤口问题比较：一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Nov;20(9):3699-3707. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14262. Epub 2023 Jun 11.
2
Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions: a Cochrane review.环切器械与标准手术技术在青少年和成年男性包皮环切术中的比较：一项 Cochrane 综述。
BJU Int. 2022 Jul;130(1):26-34. doi: 10.1111/bju.15604. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
3
Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions.环切器械与标准手术技术在青少年和成年男性割礼中的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 31;3(3):CD012250. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012250.pub2.
4
Circumcision and its effects in Africa.包皮环切术及其在非洲的影响。
Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Apr;6(2):149-157. doi: 10.21037/tau.2016.12.02.
5
The characteristics of circular disposable devices and in situ devices for optimizing male circumcision: a network meta-analysis.优化男性包皮环切术的环形一次性器械和原位器械的特点：一项网状Meta分析。
Sci Rep. 2016 May 9;6:25514. doi: 10.1038/srep25514.
6
Clinical trials using the Shang Ring device for male circumcision in Africa: a review.在非洲使用商环进行男性包皮环切术的临床试验：综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2014 Mar;3(1):113-24. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2014.01.09.
7
Lower HIV Risk Among Circumcised Men Who Have Sex With Men in China: Interaction With Anal Sex Role in a Cross-Sectional Study.中国男男性行为者中，包皮环切术降低感染艾滋病毒风险：一项横断面研究中与肛交角色的相互作用
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016 Apr 1;71(4):444-51. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000856.
8
The Spear and Shield intervention to increase the availability and acceptability of voluntary medical male circumcision in Zambia: a cluster randomised controlled trial.赞比亚提高自愿男性医学包皮环切术的可及性和可接受性的 Spear 和 Shield 干预措施：一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet HIV. 2015 May;2(5):e181-9. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(15)00042-9.
9
How do you circumcise a nation? The Rwandan case study.如何“割礼”一个国家？卢旺达案例研究。
BMC Med. 2014 Oct 6;12:184. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0184-4.
10
Proper surgical training and grading of complications for Shang Ring circumcision are necessary.对商环包皮环切术进行适当的外科培训和并发症分级是必要的。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013 Oct 1;64(2):e11. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182a333ad.
本文引用的文献
1
HIV prevention: male circumcision comparison between a nonsurgical device to a surgical technique in resource-limited settings: a prospective, randomized, nonmasked trial.艾滋病毒预防：在资源有限的环境中，非手术器械与手术技术对男性进行包皮环切的比较：一项前瞻性、随机、非盲法试验。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012 Sep 1;61(1):49-55. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182631d69.
2
Determinants of circumcision and willingness to be circumcised by Rwandan men, 2010.2010 年，卢旺达男性行割礼的决定因素及行割礼意愿。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Feb 18;12:134. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-134.
3
Voluntary medical male circumcision: modeling the impact and cost of expanding male circumcision for HIV prevention in eastern and southern Africa.自愿男性包皮环切术：模拟扩大东非和南非男性包皮环切术预防艾滋病毒的影响和成本。
PLoS Med. 2011 Nov;8(11):e1001132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001132. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
4
Adult male circumcision as an intervention against HIV: an operational study of uptake in a South African community (ANRS 12126).成年男性割礼作为预防 HIV 的干预措施：南非社区的一项采用情况研究（ANRS 12126）。
BMC Infect Dis. 2011 Sep 26;11:253. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-253.
5
The Shang Ring device for adult male circumcision: a proof of concept study in Kenya.商环男性包皮环切器：肯尼亚的概念验证研究。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011 May 1;57(1):e7-12. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182158967.
6
A model for the roll-out of comprehensive adult male circumcision services in African low-income settings of high HIV incidence: the ANRS 12126 Bophelo Pele Project.在高艾滋病毒发病率的非洲低收入环境中推出全面男性割礼服务的模式：ANRS 12126 Bophelo Pele 项目。
PLoS Med. 2010 Jul 20;7(7):e1000309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000309.
7
[Shang Ring circumcision versus conventional surgical procedures: comparison of clinical effectiveness].商环包皮环切术与传统手术方法：临床效果比较
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2010 Apr;16(4):325-7.
8
Adult template circumcision: a prospective, randomized, patient-blinded, comparative study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a novel circumcision device.成人模板环切术：一种前瞻性、随机、患者盲法、比较研究，评估一种新型环切器的安全性和有效性。
Urology. 2010 Oct;76(4):810-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.02.021.
9
[A recommendable standard protocol of adult male circumcision with the Chinese Shang Ring: outcomes of 328 cases in China].[应用中国商环的成年男性包皮环切术推荐标准术式：中国328例患者的手术结果]
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2009 Jul;15(7):584-92.
10
The number of procedures required to achieve optimal competency with male circumcision: findings from a randomized trial in Rakai, Uganda.实现男性包皮环切术最佳操作能力所需的手术次数：乌干达拉凯一项随机试验的结果
BJU Int. 2009 Aug;104(4):529-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08420.x. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
Zotero 插件