• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢替坦治疗淋菌性尿道炎和宫颈炎。

Cefotetan therapy for gonococcal urethritis and cervicitis.

作者信息

Youssef R Z, Murray M, Holmes B, Mogabgab W J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112.

出版信息

Sex Transm Dis. 1990 Apr-Jun;17(2):99-101. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199004000-00011.

DOI:10.1097/00007435-199004000-00011
PMID:2360135
Abstract

The authors compared the safety and efficacy of 0.5 and 1.0 g of cefotetan with that of 0.25 g of ceftriaxone in a 3:3:2 randomized distribution. Of 172 patients (96 men, 76 women) aged 18-43 years who were being treated at the Delgado Venereal Disease Clinic, New Orleans Health Department, for acute gonococcal urethritis or cervicitis, 123 were evaluable (81 men, 42 women). All men and 16 women were initially symptomatic. All were culture positive for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. At the 4-8 day follow-up, cultures were negative for N. gonorrhoeae in all except one man and one woman, each of whom received cefotetan 0.5 g. Symptoms were eliminated 12-72 hr after therapy in all groups. Cefotetan was well tolerated, and there were few adverse experiences reported. Thus, the authors consider cefotetan safe and effective for the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea.

摘要

作者以3:3:2的随机分布比例,比较了0.5克和1.0克头孢替坦与0.25克头孢曲松的安全性和有效性。在新奥尔良市卫生部门德尔加多性病诊所接受急性淋菌性尿道炎或宫颈炎治疗的172例年龄在18至43岁的患者(96名男性,76名女性)中,123例可进行评估(81名男性,42名女性)。所有男性和16名女性最初均有症状。所有患者淋病奈瑟菌培养均为阳性。在4至8天的随访中,除1名男性和1名女性外,所有人的淋病奈瑟菌培养均为阴性,这两名患者均接受了0.5克头孢替坦治疗。所有组的症状在治疗后12至72小时内均消失。头孢替坦耐受性良好,报告的不良事件很少。因此,作者认为头孢替坦治疗单纯性淋病安全有效。

相似文献

1
Cefotetan therapy for gonococcal urethritis and cervicitis.头孢替坦治疗淋菌性尿道炎和宫颈炎。
Sex Transm Dis. 1990 Apr-Jun;17(2):99-101. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199004000-00011.
2
Single-dose oral temafloxacin versus parenteral ceftriaxone in the treatment of gonococcal urethritis/cervicitis.单剂量口服替马沙星与肠胃外注射头孢曲松治疗淋菌性尿道炎/宫颈炎的对比研究
Am J Med. 1991 Dec 30;91(6A):145S-149S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90328-u.
3
Single-dose cefixime versus single-dose ceftriaxone in the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection.单剂量头孢克肟与单剂量头孢曲松治疗耐抗菌药物淋病奈瑟菌感染的比较
J Infect Dis. 1992 Oct;166(4):919-22. doi: 10.1093/infdis/166.4.919.
4
Single dose 1 g ceftriaxone for urogenital and pharyngeal infection caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae.单剂量1克头孢曲松用于治疗由淋病奈瑟菌引起的泌尿生殖系统感染和咽部感染。
Int J Urol. 2008 Sep;15(9):837-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02100.x. Epub 2008 Jul 25.
5
Single dose of cefodizime completely eradicated multidrug-resistant strain of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urethritis and uterine cervicitis.单剂量头孢地嗪可完全根除尿道炎和宫颈炎中的耐多药淋病奈瑟菌菌株。
J Infect Chemother. 2006 Apr;12(2):97-9. doi: 10.1007/s10156-006-0431-5.
6
Randomized trial of trovafloxacin and ofloxacin for single-dose therapy of gonorrhea. Trovafloxacin Gonorrhea Study Group.曲伐沙星与氧氟沙星单剂量治疗淋病的随机试验。曲伐沙星淋病研究组。
Am J Med. 1998 Jan;104(1):28-32. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)00277-5.
7
[Efficacy of ofloxacin in sexually transmitted male urethritis and cervicitis].氧氟沙星治疗男性性传播尿道炎和宫颈炎的疗效
Jpn J Antibiot. 1988 Oct;41(10):1445-79.
8
Oral cefixime versus intramuscular ceftriaxone in patients with uncomplicated gonococcal infections.单纯性淋菌感染患者口服头孢克肟与肌内注射头孢曲松的对比研究
Sex Transm Dis. 1992 Mar-Apr;19(2):94-8.
9
Microbiological efficacy and tolerability of a single-dose regimen of 1 g of ceftriaxone in men with gonococcal urethritis.单次给予 1 克头孢曲松治疗男性淋菌性尿道炎的微生物疗效和耐受性。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Sep;71(9):2559-62. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw180. Epub 2016 May 30.
10
Resistance of recent Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates in Nigeria and outcome of single-dose treatment with ciprofloxacin.尼日利亚近期淋病奈瑟菌分离株的耐药性及环丙沙星单剂量治疗的结果。
Infection. 1992 Nov-Dec;20(6):339-41. doi: 10.1007/BF01710680.