Institute of Physiology and Anatomy, German Sport University Cologne, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933 Cologne, Germany.
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Jun;227(2):243-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3506-4. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
Previous research on cognitive deficits during shallow water immersion led to inconsistent results: some authors observed deficits at 5 m, but others only at depths well beyond 5 m. The present study evaluates whether this discrepancy could be related to different levels of difficulty. Forty-eight subjects participated in a mental rotation task and in a color-word task, both having multiple levels of difficulty. The two tasks were administered once 5 m below the water's surface and once on dry land. Compared to land, subjects' reaction time increased in 5 m depth when task difficulty was low, but it did not increase when task difficulty was high. Thus, performance deficits in 5 m depth were inversely related to task complexity. We interpret this counter-intuitive finding within the framework of a multiple-channel parallel processing model, with channels that are differentially sensitive to immersion. This model correctly predicts performance deficits on simple, but not on complex skills at smaller depths, and deficits on simple as well as complex skills at larger depths, in accordance with the present findings and data from literature.
一些作者在 5 米处观察到缺陷,但其他作者仅在远超过 5 米的深度处观察到缺陷。本研究评估这种差异是否与不同的难度水平有关。48 名受试者参加了一项心理旋转任务和一项颜色-词汇任务,这两项任务都有多个难度级别。这两项任务在水面以下 5 米处和在干燥的陆地上各进行一次。与陆地相比,当任务难度较低时,受试者在 5 米深处的反应时间会增加,但当任务难度较高时,反应时间不会增加。因此,在 5 米深度的表现缺陷与任务复杂性呈反比。我们在多通道并行处理模型的框架内解释了这种反直觉的发现,该模型对不同的通道敏感,通道对浸没的敏感度不同。该模型正确地预测了在较小深度下简单但不复杂技能的表现缺陷,以及在较大深度下简单和复杂技能的表现缺陷,与本研究的发现和文献中的数据一致。