• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健提供者对电子健康的采用:系统文献综述

Health Care Provider Adoption of eHealth: Systematic Literature Review.

作者信息

Li Junhua, Talaei-Khoei Amir, Seale Holly, Ray Pradeep, Macintyre C Raina

机构信息

Asia-Pacific ubiquitous Healthcare research Centre (APuHC), The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Interact J Med Res. 2013 Apr 16;2(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.2468.

DOI:10.2196/ijmr.2468
PMID:23608679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3628149/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

eHealth is an application of information and communication technologies across the whole range of functions that affect health. The benefits of eHealth (eg, improvement of health care operational efficiency and quality of patient care) have previously been documented in the literature. Health care providers (eg, medical doctors) are the key driving force in pushing eHealth initiatives. Without their acceptance and actual use, those eHealth benefits would be unlikely to be reaped.

OBJECTIVE

To identify and synthesize influential factors to health care providers' acceptance of various eHealth systems.

METHODS

This systematic literature review was conducted in four steps. The first two steps facilitated the location and identification of relevant articles. The third step extracted key information from those articles including the studies' characteristics and results. In the last step, identified factors were analyzed and grouped in accordance with the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT).

RESULTS

This study included 93 papers that have studied health care providers' acceptance of eHealth. From these papers, 40 factors were identified and grouped into 7 clusters: (1) health care provider characteristics, (2) medical practice characteristics, (3) voluntariness of use, (4) performance expectancy, (5) effort expectancy, (6) social influence, and (7) facilitating or inhibiting conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

The grouping results demonstrated that the UTAUT model is useful for organizing the literature but has its limitations. Due to the complex contextual dynamics of health care settings, our work suggested that there would be potential to extend theories on information technology adoption, which is of great benefit to readers interested in learning more on the topic. Practically, these findings may help health care decision makers proactively introduce interventions to encourage acceptance of eHealth and may also assist health policy makers refine relevant policies to promote the eHealth innovation.

摘要

背景

电子健康是信息通信技术在影响健康的所有功能领域的应用。电子健康的益处(如提高医疗保健运营效率和患者护理质量)此前已在文献中得到记载。医疗保健提供者(如医生)是推动电子健康倡议的关键驱动力。没有他们的接受和实际使用,就不太可能收获这些电子健康的益处。

目的

识别并综合影响医疗保健提供者接受各种电子健康系统的因素。

方法

本系统文献综述分四个步骤进行。前两个步骤有助于查找和识别相关文章。第三步从这些文章中提取关键信息,包括研究的特征和结果。在最后一步,根据技术接受与使用统一理论(UTAUT)对识别出的因素进行分析和分组。

结果

本研究纳入了93篇关于医疗保健提供者对电子健康接受情况的研究论文。从这些论文中,识别出40个因素,并将其分为7类:(1)医疗保健提供者特征;(2)医疗实践特征;(3)使用的自愿性;(4)绩效期望;(5)努力期望;(6)社会影响;(7)促进或抑制条件。

结论

分组结果表明,UTAUT模型有助于整理文献,但也有其局限性。由于医疗保健环境中复杂的情境动态,我们的研究表明,有可能扩展信息技术采纳理论,这对有兴趣深入了解该主题的读者大有裨益。实际上,这些发现可能有助于医疗保健决策者积极引入干预措施,以鼓励对电子健康的接受,也可能有助于卫生政策制定者完善相关政策,以促进电子健康创新。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cafe/3628149/8fb74b6952da/ijmr_v2i1e7_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cafe/3628149/5ee45545be59/ijmr_v2i1e7_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cafe/3628149/3c5652e5af21/ijmr_v2i1e7_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cafe/3628149/8fb74b6952da/ijmr_v2i1e7_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cafe/3628149/5ee45545be59/ijmr_v2i1e7_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cafe/3628149/3c5652e5af21/ijmr_v2i1e7_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cafe/3628149/8fb74b6952da/ijmr_v2i1e7_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Health Care Provider Adoption of eHealth: Systematic Literature Review.医疗保健提供者对电子健康的采用:系统文献综述
Interact J Med Res. 2013 Apr 16;2(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.2468.
2
Use and the Users of a Patient Portal: Cross-Sectional Study.患者门户网站的使用情况及用户:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Sep 17;20(9):e262. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9418.
3
Determining the Influencing Factors on Acceptance of eHealth Pain Management Interventions Among Patients With Chronic Pain Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: Cross-sectional Study.运用技术接受与使用统一理论确定慢性疼痛患者对电子健康疼痛管理干预措施接受度的影响因素:横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Aug 17;6(8):e37682. doi: 10.2196/37682.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Patient and provider perspectives on eHealth interventions in Canada and Australia: a scoping review.患者和提供者对加拿大和澳大利亚电子健康干预措施的看法:范围综述。
Rural Remote Health. 2020 Sep;20(3):5754. doi: 10.22605/RRH5754. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
6
Consumer Adoption of Future MyData-Based Preventive eHealth Services: An Acceptance Model and Survey Study.消费者对未来基于个人数据的预防性电子健康服务的采用:一种接受模型及调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Dec 22;19(12):e429. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7821.
7
Theories Informing eHealth Implementation: Systematic Review and Typology Classification.理论指导电子健康实施:系统评价和分类学分类。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 31;23(5):e18500. doi: 10.2196/18500.
8
Use Intention and User Expectations of Human-Supported and Self-Help eHealth Interventions: Internet-Based Randomized Controlled Trial.人类辅助和自助式电子健康干预措施的使用意图和用户期望:基于互联网的随机对照试验。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Feb 15;8:e38803. doi: 10.2196/38803.
9
Effects of eHealth on hospital practice: synthesis of the current literature.电子健康对医院实践的影响:当前文献综述
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Sep;42(5):568-578. doi: 10.1071/AH17255.
10
Barriers to eHealth adoption in routine antenatal care practices: Perspectives of expectant mothers in Uganda - A qualitative study using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model.常规产前护理实践中采用电子健康的障碍:乌干达准妈妈的观点——一项基于技术接受与使用统一理论模型的定性研究
Digit Health. 2021 Dec 8;7:20552076211064406. doi: 10.1177/20552076211064406. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Care Professionals' Perspectives on Technology Use in Urinary Care: Cross-Sectional Survey-Based Study.医疗保健专业人员对泌尿护理中技术应用的看法:基于横断面调查的研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 24;9:e73453. doi: 10.2196/73453.
2
Health Care Professionals' Perspectives on Using eHealth Tools in Advanced Home Care: Qualitative Interview Study.医疗保健专业人员对在高级家庭护理中使用电子健康工具的看法:定性访谈研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Mar 24;12:e60582. doi: 10.2196/60582.
3
Assistive technologies in healthcare: utilization and healthcare workers perceptions in Germany.

本文引用的文献

1
Adoption of anesthesia information management systems by US anesthesiologists.美国麻醉医师采用麻醉信息管理系统。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2011 Apr;25(2):129-35. doi: 10.1007/s10877-011-9289-x. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
2
Physician and practice characteristics associated with longitudinal increases in electronic health records adoption.与电子健康记录采用率的纵向增长相关的医师和实践特征。
J Healthc Manag. 2011 May-Jun;56(3):183-97; discussion 197-8.
3
EHR adoption and use. Results from the 2010 Minnesota ambulatory clinic survey.电子健康记录的采用与使用。2010年明尼苏达州门诊诊所调查结果。
医疗保健中的辅助技术:德国的使用情况及医护人员的看法
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 10;25(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12162-x.
4
Acceptance and Use of eHealth in Support and Psychological Therapy for People With Intellectual Disabilities: Two Cross-Sectional Studies of Health Care Professionals.接受和使用电子健康在支持和心理治疗智障人士中的应用:对医疗保健专业人员的两项横断面研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 12;8:e52788. doi: 10.2196/52788.
5
Analyzing health service employees' intention to use e-health systems in southwest Ethiopia: using UTAUT-2 model.分析埃塞俄比亚西南部卫生服务员工使用电子健康系统的意愿:使用 UTAUT-2 模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1136. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11567-y.
6
Implementation barriers and facilitators of remote monitoring, remote consultation and digital care platforms through the eyes of healthcare professionals: a review of reviews.远程监测、远程咨询和数字护理平台实施的障碍和促进因素:综述的综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 10;14(6):e075833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075833.
7
Digital Health Support: Current Status and Future Development for Enhancing Dialysis Patient Care and Empowering Patients.数字健康支持:提高透析患者护理水平和赋能患者的现状和未来发展。
Toxins (Basel). 2024 Apr 30;16(5):211. doi: 10.3390/toxins16050211.
8
Investigating perceptions and attitude toward telenursing among undergraduate nursing students for the future of nursing education: a cross-sectional study.调查本科护理专业学生对远程护理的认知和态度以展望护理教育的未来:一项横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Apr 8;23(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01903-2.
9
A qualitative interview study of patients' attitudes towards and intention to use digital interventions for depressive disorders on prescription.一项关于患者对处方中用于治疗抑郁症的数字干预措施的态度及使用意愿的定性访谈研究。
Front Digit Health. 2024 Feb 5;6:1275569. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1275569. eCollection 2024.
10
Evidence of How Physicians and Their Patients Adopt mHealth Apps in Germany: Exploratory Qualitative Study.德国医生及其患者采用移动医疗应用程序的证据:探索性定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jan 17;12:e48345. doi: 10.2196/48345.
Minn Med. 2011 Apr;94(4):33-6.
4
Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review.比较用户群体对实施电子健康记录的障碍和促进因素的观点:系统评价。
BMC Med. 2011 Apr 28;9:46. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-46.
5
Electronic health records in small physician practices: availability, use, and perceived benefits.小型医师执业中的电子健康记录:可用性、使用情况和感知收益。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 May 1;18(3):271-5. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000010.
6
What is the point of the point-of-care? A case study of user resistance to an e-health system.即时护理的意义是什么?以一个电子医疗系统的用户抵制案例研究为视角。
Telemed J E Health. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):55-61. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0008.
7
Lessons learned from implementation of a computerized application for pending tests at hospital discharge.从医院出院时待检计算机应用程序实施中吸取的经验教训。
J Hosp Med. 2011 Jan;6(1):16-21. doi: 10.1002/jhm.794. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
8
EHR adoption among doctors who treat the elderly.老年人治疗医生中的电子健康记录采用率。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;16(6):1103-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01277.x.
9
Stages of use: consideration, initiation, utilization, and outcomes of an internet-mediated intervention.使用阶段:互联网介导干预的考虑、启动、利用和结果。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Nov 23;10:73. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-73.
10
Has information technology finally been adopted in Flemish intensive care units?信息技术是否终于在佛兰芒重症监护病房得到采用?
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Oct 19;10:62. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-62.