• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们应该谷歌一下吗?内科住院医师在即时临床决策中对资源的利用。

Should we Google it? Resource use by internal medicine residents for point-of-care clinical decision making.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2013 Jun;88(6):788-94. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828ffdb7.

DOI:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828ffdb7
PMID:23619072
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine which resources residents use at the point-of-care (POC) for decision making, the drivers for selection of these resources, and how residents use Google/Google Scholar to answer clinical questions at the POC.

METHOD

In January 2012, 299 residents from three internal medicine residencies were sent an electronic survey regarding resources used for POC decision making. Resource use frequency and factors influencing choice were determined using descriptive statistics. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine relationships between the independent variables.

RESULTS

A total of 167 residents (56%) responded; similar numbers responded at each level of training. Residents most frequently reported using UpToDate and Google at the POC at least daily (85% and 63%, respectively), with speed and trust in the quality of information being the primary drivers of selection. Google, used by 68% of residents, was used primarily to locate Web sites and general information about diseases, whereas Google Scholar, used by 30% of residents, tended to be used for treatment and management decisions or locating a journal article.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that internal medicine residents use UpToDate most frequently, followed by consultation with faculty and the search engines Google and Google Scholar; speed, trust, and portability are the biggest drivers for resource selection; and time and information overload appear to be the biggest barriers to resources such as Ovid MEDLINE. Residents frequently used Google and may benefit from further training in information management skills.

摘要

目的

确定住院医师在决策时在床边(POC)使用哪些资源,选择这些资源的驱动因素,以及住院医师如何使用 Google/Google Scholar 在 POC 回答临床问题。

方法

2012 年 1 月,向来自三个内科住院医师培训项目的 299 名住院医师发送了一份关于在 POC 决策中使用资源的电子调查。使用描述性统计数据确定资源使用频率和选择的影响因素。使用二元逻辑回归分析确定自变量之间的关系。

结果

共有 167 名住院医师(56%)做出了回应;每个培训水平的回应数量相似。住院医师最常报告在 POC 至少每天使用 UpToDate 和 Google(分别为 85%和 63%),选择的主要驱动因素是速度和对信息质量的信任。68%的住院医师使用 Google,主要用于查找网站和有关疾病的一般信息,而 30%的住院医师使用 Google Scholar,主要用于治疗和管理决策或查找期刊文章。

结论

研究结果表明,内科住院医师最常使用 UpToDate,其次是与教员的咨询以及搜索引擎 Google 和 Google Scholar;速度、信任和便携性是资源选择的最大驱动因素;时间和信息过载似乎是像 Ovid MEDLINE 这样的资源的最大障碍。住院医师经常使用 Google,可能受益于进一步的信息管理技能培训。

相似文献

1
Should we Google it? Resource use by internal medicine residents for point-of-care clinical decision making.我们应该谷歌一下吗?内科住院医师在即时临床决策中对资源的利用。
Acad Med. 2013 Jun;88(6):788-94. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828ffdb7.
2
The Internet School of Medicine: use of electronic resources by medical trainees and the reliability of those resources.互联网医学院:医学实习生对电子资源的使用及其资源的可靠性
J Surg Educ. 2015 Mar-Apr;72(2):316-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
3
Learning radiology a survey investigating radiology resident use of textbooks, journals, and the internet.放射学学习:一项关于放射科住院医师对教科书、期刊和互联网使用情况的调查
Acad Radiol. 2007 Sep;14(9):1113-20. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.06.002.
4
Answering questions at the point of care: do residents practice EBM or manage information sources?在医疗现场回答问题:住院医师是践行循证医学还是管理信息来源?
Acad Med. 2007 Mar;82(3):298-303. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3180307fed.
5
Speed, accuracy, and confidence in Google, Ovid, PubMed, and UpToDate: results of a randomised trial.在谷歌、Ovid、PubMed 和 UpToDate 中的速度、准确性和信心:一项随机试验的结果。
Postgrad Med J. 2010 Aug;86(1018):459-65. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2010.098053.
6
A cognitive evaluation of four online search engines for answering definitional questions posed by physicians.对四个在线搜索引擎回答医生提出的定义性问题的认知评估。
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2007:328-39.
7
Are primary care residents adequately prepared to care for women of reproductive age?基层医疗住院医师是否为照顾育龄女性做好了充分准备?
Fam Plann Perspect. 1995 Mar-Apr;27(2):66-70.
8
Google Scholar versus PubMed in locating primary literature to answer drug-related questions.在查找用于回答药物相关问题的原始文献方面,谷歌学术与医学期刊数据库(PubMed)的比较。
Ann Pharmacother. 2009 Mar;43(3):478-84. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L223. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
9
Developing search strategies for clinical practice guidelines in SUMSearch and Google Scholar and assessing their retrieval performance.在SUMSearch和谷歌学术中为临床实践指南制定检索策略并评估其检索性能。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007 Jun 30;7:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-28.
10
A comparison of world wide web resources for identifying medical information.用于识别医学信息的万维网资源比较。
Acad Radiol. 2008 Sep;15(9):1165-72. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.02.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishing a policy statement on the use of artificial intelligence in neurosurgery.制定关于神经外科中人工智能使用的政策声明。
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Aug 19;48(1):606. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03745-1.
2
A mixed-methods survey and focus group study to understand researcher and clinician preferences for a Journal transparency Tool.一项混合方法调查和焦点小组研究,旨在了解研究人员和临床医生对期刊透明度工具的偏好。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 4;14(1):26626. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77790-z.
3
Information-seeking behaviour in patients exploring orthognathic surgery: A qualitative study.
探索正颌手术患者的信息寻求行为:一项定性研究。
J Orthod. 2025 Mar;52(1):63-71. doi: 10.1177/14653125241249494. Epub 2024 May 8.
4
Medical Students' Preferences of Study Resources: Physical vs Digital Resources.医学生对学习资源的偏好:实体资源与数字资源
Cureus. 2024 Mar 14;16(3):e56196. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56196. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
Initial efforts to improve medical student information-seeking behavior with embedded library instruction.利用嵌入式图书馆教学提高医学生信息检索行为的初步尝试。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2023 Oct 2;111(4):823-828. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2023.1771.
6
Google Images Search Results as a Resource in the Anatomy Laboratory: Rating of Educational Value.谷歌图片搜索结果作为解剖实验室的一种资源:教育价值评级
JMIR Med Educ. 2022 Oct 21;8(4):e37730. doi: 10.2196/37730.
7
Digital Health and Learning in Speech-Language Pathology, Phoniatrics, and Otolaryngology: Survey Study for Designing a Digital Learning Toolbox App.言语病理学、儿童语音学和耳鼻喉科学中的数字健康与学习:设计数字学习工具箱应用程序的调查研究
JMIR Med Educ. 2022 Apr 27;8(2):e34042. doi: 10.2196/34042.
8
Why are they not accessing it? User barriers to clinical information access.为什么他们无法访问?临床信息获取的用户障碍。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jan 1;109(1):126-132. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1051.
9
Ownership and Usage of Mobile Devices Among Ophthalmology Residents and Attending Physicians: Identifying the Generation Gap.眼科住院医师和主治医师对移动设备的所有权及使用情况:识别代沟
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020 Oct 29;11:801-805. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S272665. eCollection 2020.
10
Obstetrician-Gynecologist Views of Pregnancy-Related Medication Safety.妇产科医生对与妊娠相关的药物安全性的看法。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Aug;29(8):1113-1121. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8007. Epub 2020 Apr 1.