Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, 1512 Pendleton St., Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 May 1;64(5):483-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.000502012.
OBJECTIVE School programs provided by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's National Registry of Evidence-Based Programs and Practices (NREPP) were reviewed to describe program characteristics, costs, and ratings of research and dissemination. METHODS Data were gathered from the NREPP to identify mental health programs adaptable for schools. Program costs and quality and dissemination ratings were examined as a function of program characteristics. RESULTS School mental health programs constituted 32% of the registry, with 44% providing only materials at cost and 46% providing universal mental health promotion rather than intensive supports. Readiness for dissemination was poorer for programs providing only intensive supports, and quality of research increased as total costs of program implementation increased. CONCLUSIONS Mechanisms for tracking mental health promotion and treatment can be effective in disseminating information about evidence-based school programming. Assessing program transportability is necessary for decision making to match programs with the needs of particular schools and communities.
目的 对物质滥用和心理健康服务管理局国家循证计划和实践登记处(NREPP)提供的学校项目进行了审查,以描述计划的特点、成本以及研究和传播的评级。 方法 从 NREPP 收集数据,以确定适合学校的心理健康计划。 检查了计划成本以及质量和传播评级,作为计划特征的函数。 结果 学校心理健康计划占登记处的 32%,其中 44%仅按成本提供材料,46%提供普遍的心理健康促进,而不是强化支持。 仅提供强化支持的计划的传播准备情况较差,随着计划实施总成本的增加,研究质量也会提高。 结论 跟踪心理健康促进和治疗的机制可以有效地传播有关循证学校计划的信息。 评估计划的可转移性对于决策将计划与特定学校和社区的需求相匹配是必要的。