School of Social Ecology, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 May 21;47(10):5495-503. doi: 10.1021/es400614y. Epub 2013 May 3.
Rechargeable lithium-ion (Li-ion) and lithium-polymer (Li-poly) batteries have recently become dominant in consumer electronic products because of advantages associated with energy density and product longevity. However, the small size of these batteries, the high rate of disposal of consumer products in which they are used, and the lack of uniform regulatory policy on their disposal means that lithium batteries may contribute substantially to environmental pollution and adverse human health impacts due to potentially toxic materials. In this research, we used standardized leaching tests, life-cycle impact assessment (LCIA), and hazard assessment models to evaluate hazardous waste classification, resource depletion potential, and toxicity potentials of lithium batteries used in cellphones. Our results demonstrate that according to U.S. federal regulations, defunct Li-ion batteries are classified hazardous due to their lead (Pb) content (average 6.29 mg/L; σ = 11.1; limit 5). However, according to California regulations, all lithium batteries tested are classified hazardous due to excessive levels of cobalt (average 163,544 mg/kg; σ = 62,897; limit 8000), copper (average 98,694 mg/kg; σ = 28,734; limit 2500), and nickel (average 9525 mg/kg; σ = 11,438; limit 2000). In some of the Li-ion batteries, the leached concentrations of chromium, lead, and thallium exceeded the California regulation limits. The environmental impact associated with resource depletion and human toxicity is mainly associated with cobalt, copper, nickel, thallium, and silver, whereas the ecotoxicity potential is primarily associated with cobalt, copper, nickel, thallium, and silver. However, the relative contribution of aluminum and lithium to human toxicity and ecotoxicity could not be estimated due to insufficient toxicity data in the models. These findings support the need for stronger government policy at the local, national, and international levels to encourage recovery, recycling, and reuse of lithium battery materials.
可充电锂离子(Li-ion)和锂聚合物(Li-poly)电池由于其在能量密度和产品寿命方面的优势,最近在消费电子产品中占据主导地位。然而,这些电池体积小、消费者产品的处置率高,以及缺乏统一的监管政策来处理这些电池,这意味着锂电池可能会由于潜在的有毒物质而对环境污染和人类健康产生重大影响。在这项研究中,我们使用标准化的浸出测试、生命周期影响评估(LCIA)和危害评估模型来评估手机中使用的锂电池的危险废物分类、资源枯竭潜力和毒性潜力。我们的研究结果表明,根据美国联邦法规,由于锂离子电池的铅(Pb)含量(平均 6.29 毫克/升;σ=11.1;限值 5),废旧锂离子电池被归类为危险废物。然而,根据加利福尼亚法规,所有测试的锂电池由于钴含量过高(平均 163544 毫克/千克;σ=62897;限值 8000)、铜(平均 98694 毫克/千克;σ=28734;限值 2500)和镍(平均 9525 毫克/千克;σ=11438;限值 2000),都被归类为危险废物。在一些锂离子电池中,浸出的铬、铅和铊浓度超过了加利福尼亚州的规定限值。与资源枯竭和人类毒性相关的环境影响主要与钴、铜、镍、铊和银有关,而生态毒性潜力主要与钴、铜、镍、铊和银有关。然而,由于模型中缺乏足够的毒性数据,无法估计铝和锂对人类毒性和生态毒性的相对贡献。这些发现支持在地方、国家和国际各级制定更有力的政府政策,以鼓励回收、再循环和再利用锂电池材料。