• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

波兰人群中精神心理性肝性脑病评分的正常化。一项前瞻性、量化脑电图研究。

Normalization of the psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score in Polish population. A prospective, quantified electroencephalography study.

机构信息

Liver Research Laboratories, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.

出版信息

Liver Int. 2013 Oct;33(9):1332-40. doi: 10.1111/liv.12194. Epub 2013 May 8.

DOI:10.1111/liv.12194
PMID:23651263
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) is recommended as a gold standard in evaluation of minimal hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Normative databases have been collected in few countries, clearly showing differences among studied groups. Thus, the standardization of PHES for selected populations remains necessary.

AIMS

To standardize PHES in a large cohort of Polish healthy subjects and to evaluate the normograms in patients with cirrhosis with quantified electroencephalography (EEG).

METHODS

Three hundred and sixteen (142 males/174 females, aged 44.5 ± 12.1) normal individuals and 50 (31 males/19 females, aged 52.8 ± 12.4) patients with cirrhosis without overt HE were included. Key correction variables of psychometric tests were performed. The multivariate linear regression was used to calculate PHES normograms.

RESULTS

Age and education levels were identified as predictors of all tests, therefore age- and education-adjusted normograms were developed. A weighted time-errors regression model for line tracing test (LTT) scoring was used. The PHES ranged between +5 and -15 points and the cut-off between normal and pathological PHES was set on ≤-5 points. By this cut-off level, PHES had a sensitivity of 57% and specificity of 97% to diagnose minimal HE (AUC = 0.866 ± 0.028). In patients with cirrhosis, PHES correlated with severity of liver disease (MELD, r = -0.475, P < 0.001 and Child-Pugh classification, r = -0.452, P < 0.002) and EEG (r = 0.547, P < 0.002). In patients with impaired EEG, PHES was lower than in individuals with unaltered EEG (P < 0.02); however, agreement between these two modalities was limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Valid Polish PHES normograms, which incorporates w-LTT scoring system have been developed. Future multi-centre international studies are needed to validate widely applicable norms.

摘要

背景

精神状态肝性脑病评分(PHES)被推荐为评估轻微肝性脑病(HE)的金标准。在少数国家已经收集了规范数据库,这些数据库清楚地显示了研究组之间的差异。因此,有必要为选定的人群制定 PHES 标准。

目的

在波兰的一个大的健康受试者队列中对 PHES 进行标准化,并使用量化脑电图(EEG)评估肝硬化患者的 PHES 正常值。

方法

纳入 316 名(142 名男性/174 名女性,年龄 44.5±12.1)正常个体和 50 名(31 名男性/19 名女性,年龄 52.8±12.4)无显性 HE 的肝硬化患者。对心理测试的关键校正变量进行了分析。使用多元线性回归计算 PHES 正常值图。

结果

年龄和教育水平被确定为所有测试的预测因素,因此制定了年龄和教育调整的正常值图。使用线追踪测试(LTT)评分的加权时间错误回归模型。PHES 范围在+5 到-15 分之间,正常和病理 PHES 的分界点设定为≤-5 分。在该截断水平下,PHES 诊断轻微 HE 的灵敏度为 57%,特异性为 97%(AUC=0.866±0.028)。在肝硬化患者中,PHES 与肝病严重程度(MELD,r=-0.475,P<0.001 和 Child-Pugh 分级,r=-0.452,P<0.002)和 EEG(r=0.547,P<0.002)相关。在 EEG 受损的患者中,PHES 低于 EEG 正常的患者(P<0.02);然而,这两种方法之间的一致性有限。

结论

制定了包含 w-LTT 评分系统的有效的波兰 PHES 正常值图。未来需要进行多中心国际研究,以验证广泛适用的正常值。

相似文献

1
Normalization of the psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score in Polish population. A prospective, quantified electroencephalography study.波兰人群中精神心理性肝性脑病评分的正常化。一项前瞻性、量化脑电图研究。
Liver Int. 2013 Oct;33(9):1332-40. doi: 10.1111/liv.12194. Epub 2013 May 8.
2
Detection of minimal hepatic encephalopathy: normalization and optimization of the Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score. A neuropsychological and quantified EEG study.轻微肝性脑病的检测:心理测量肝性脑病评分的标准化与优化。一项神经心理学和定量脑电图研究。
J Hepatol. 2008 Sep;49(3):346-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.04.022. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
3
Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score for the detection of minimal hepatic encephalopathy in Korean patients with liver cirrhosis.用于检测肝硬化韩国患者轻微肝性脑病的精神测量肝性脑病评分。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Nov;27(11):1695-704. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07217.x.
4
Value of critical flicker frequency and psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score in diagnosis of low-grade hepatic encephalopathy.临界闪烁频率和心理测肝性脑病评分在诊断轻度肝性脑病中的价值。
Gastroenterology. 2014 Apr;146(4):961-9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.12.026. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
5
Diagnosis of minimal hepatic encephalopathy in a tertiary care center from eastern Romania: validation of the psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES).罗马尼亚东部一家三级医疗中心对轻微肝性脑病的诊断:心理测量肝性脑病评分(PHES)的验证
Metab Brain Dis. 2016 Dec;31(6):1463-1471. doi: 10.1007/s11011-016-9878-y. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
6
A simplified psychometric evaluation for the diagnosis of minimal hepatic encephalopathy.用于诊断轻微肝性脑病的简化心理计量学评估。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jul;9(7):613-6.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.03.017. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
7
Minimal hepatic encephalopathy does not impair health-related quality of life in patients with cirrhosis: a prospective study.轻微型肝性脑病不会损害肝硬化患者的健康相关生活质量:一项前瞻性研究。
Liver Int. 2011 Aug;31(7):980-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02465.x. Epub 2011 Feb 10.
8
PSYCHOMETRIC HEPATIC ENCEPHALOPATHY SCORE FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF MINIMAL HEPATIC ENCEPHALOPATHY IN ROMANIAN CIRRHOTIC PATIENTS--PARTIAL RESULTS.用于诊断罗马尼亚肝硬化患者轻微肝性脑病的心理测量肝性脑病评分——部分结果
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2015 Apr-Jun;119(2):368-73.
9
Normalization of the psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score for diagnosis of minimal hepatic encephalopathy in Turkey.土耳其用于诊断轻微肝性脑病的心理测量肝性脑病评分的标准化。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2017 Apr;20(4):421-426. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.204375.
10
Value of the critical flicker frequency in patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy.临界闪烁频率在轻度肝性脑病患者中的价值。
Hepatology. 2007 Apr;45(4):879-85. doi: 10.1002/hep.21586.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimal hepatic encephalopathy: Characteristics and comparison of the main diagnostic modalities.轻微肝性脑病:主要诊断方法的特点及比较
Clin Exp Hepatol. 2024 Dec;10(4):218-226. doi: 10.5114/ceh.2024.145438. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
2
Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) - when, how, why, and why not: a guide for the unfamiliar.心理测量肝性脑病评分(PHES)——何时、如何、为何以及为何不适用:给新手的指南
Prz Gastroenterol. 2025;20(1):31-35. doi: 10.5114/pg.2024.145382. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
3
Portosystemic Hepatic Encephalopathy Scores (PHES) differ between Danish and German healthy populations despite their geographical and cultural similarities.
丹麦和德国的健康人群尽管在地理和文化上存在相似之处,但他们的门脉系统肝性脑病评分(PHES)存在差异。
Metab Brain Dis. 2024 Aug;39(6):1149-1155. doi: 10.1007/s11011-024-01380-1. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
4
Detection of minimal hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis based on the Stroop-CN model (NCRCID-CHESS 2106): a prospective multicenter study.基于Stroop-CN模型(NCRCID-CHESS 2106)检测肝硬化患者的轻微肝性脑病:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
MedComm (2020). 2024 Jul 15;5(8):e627. doi: 10.1002/mco2.627. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score for the Diagnosis of Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy in Thai Cirrhotic Patients.用于诊断泰国肝硬化患者轻微肝性脑病的心理测量肝性脑病评分
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 8;12(2):519. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020519.
6
Minimal hepatic encephalopathy - diagnosis and treatment.轻微肝性脑病——诊断与治疗
Prz Gastroenterol. 2021;16(4):311-317. doi: 10.5114/pg.2021.111389. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
7
Artificial Intelligence and Its Application to Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy Diagnosis.人工智能及其在轻微肝性脑病诊断中的应用。
J Pers Med. 2021 Oct 26;11(11):1090. doi: 10.3390/jpm11111090.
8
Standardization of the psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score in a French population.在法国人群中对心理测量性肝性脑病评分进行标准化。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 10;16(9):e0257136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257136. eCollection 2021.
9
Determination of Turkish norms of psychometric tests for diagnosing minimal hepatic encephalopathy and proposal of a high sensitive screening test battery.测定土耳其人用于诊断轻微肝性脑病的心理测试计量表的常模,以及提出一个高灵敏度的筛选测试组合。
Hepatol Int. 2021 Dec;15(6):1442-1455. doi: 10.1007/s12072-021-10207-5. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
10
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor as a potential diagnostic marker in minimal hepatic encephalopathy.脑源性神经营养因子作为轻微肝性脑病的潜在诊断标志物
Clin Exp Hepatol. 2021 Mar;7(1):117-124. doi: 10.5114/ceh.2021.103242. Epub 2021 Feb 2.