Department of Internal Medicine, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
Hepatol Int. 2021 Dec;15(6):1442-1455. doi: 10.1007/s12072-021-10207-5. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) needs local standardization.
This study aimed at standardizing PHES for Turkish patients and compare them with German norms; to determine minimal hepatic encephalopathy (mHE) prevalence with two different methods [PHES battery and Critical Flicker Frequency (CFF)] and to assess whether sub-tests of the battery can be used for screening for mHE.
Healthy volunteers (n = 816; 400 male) and cirrhotics (n = 124; 58 male) were included. For mHE diagnosis PHES score threshold was set at ≤ - 5 points and that of CFF at < 39 Hz. For comparing German and Turkish norms, datasets were combined. Multiple backward procedure was applied to assess effects of age, sex and education on single tests of the battery. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created for assessing diagnostic capabilities of subtests of the battery.
PHES norms for Turks were developed. MHE prevalence in compensated cirrhotics was 29.8% and 27.4% with PHES and CFF tests, respectively, with low compatibility (kappa coefficient 0.389); mHE prevalence decreased to 16% when both tests were combined. Turks performed worse vs Germans in the digit symbol (DS) and serial dotting (SD) subtests but performed better in other subtests. In ROC analyzes of subtests, the combination of DS + SD tests achieved an AUROC of 0.974 versus PHES.
Use of two methods for diagnosing mHE is important for research purposes. From a clinical perspective, sensitivity with acceptable specificity may suffice for screening instruments for mHE. Combined use of DS and SD subtests of the PHES battery appears suitable for this purpose.
心理测量性肝性脑病评分(PHES)需要进行本土化标准。
本研究旨在为土耳其患者建立 PHES 评分标准,并与德国正常值进行比较;使用两种不同的方法[PHES 电池和临界闪烁频率(CFF)]确定最小肝性脑病(mHE)的患病率,并评估电池的子测试是否可用于 mHE 的筛查。
纳入了健康志愿者(n = 816;400 名男性)和肝硬化患者(n = 124;58 名男性)。mHE 的诊断 PHES 评分阈值设定为 ≤ -5 分,CFF 阈值设定为 < 39 Hz。为了比较德国和土耳其的正常值,将数据集合并。应用多元逐步回归分析评估年龄、性别和教育对电池各单项测试的影响。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估电池子测试的诊断能力。
建立了土耳其人的 PHES 评分标准。代偿性肝硬化患者的 mHE 患病率分别为 29.8%和 27.4%,PHES 和 CFF 测试的吻合度较低(kappa 系数为 0.389);当两种测试联合使用时,mHE 患病率降低至 16%。与德国相比,土耳其人在数字符号(DS)和连续打点(SD)子测试中的表现较差,但在其他子测试中的表现较好。在子测试的 ROC 分析中,DS + SD 测试组合的 AUROC 为 0.974,优于 PHES。
对于研究目的,使用两种方法诊断 mHE 非常重要。从临床角度来看,具有可接受特异性的敏感性可能足以用于 mHE 的筛查工具。PHES 电池的 DS 和 SD 子测试联合使用似乎适用于此目的。