Suppr超能文献

基础生物学教科书对科学过程的呈现不足。

Introductory biology textbooks under-represent scientific process.

作者信息

Duncan Dara B, Lubman Alexandra, Hoskins Sally G

机构信息

Biology Dept., City College of CUNY, New York, NY 10031.

出版信息

J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2011 Dec 1;12(2):143-51. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v12i2.307. Print 2011.

Abstract

Attrition of undergraduates from Biology majors is a long-standing problem. Introductory courses that fail to engage students or spark their curiosity by emphasizing the open-ended and creative nature of biological investigation and discovery could contribute to student detachment from the field. Our hypothesis was that introductory biology books devote relatively few figures to illustration of the design and interpretation of experiments or field studies, thereby de-emphasizing the scientific process. To investigate this possibility, we examined figures in six Introductory Biology textbooks published in 2008. On average, multistep scientific investigations were presented in fewer than 5% of the hundreds of figures in each book. Devoting such a small percentage of figures to the processes by which discoveries are made discourages an emphasis on scientific thinking. We suggest that by increasing significantly the illustration of scientific investigations, textbooks could support undergraduates' early interest in biology, stimulate the development of design and analytical skills, and inspire some students to participate in investigations of their own.

摘要

生物学专业本科学生的流失是一个长期存在的问题。入门课程若未能通过强调生物学研究和发现的开放性与创造性来吸引学生或激发他们的好奇心,可能会导致学生与该领域脱节。我们的假设是,生物学入门教材用于阐释实验或实地研究的设计与解读的插图相对较少,从而淡化了科学过程。为了探究这种可能性,我们检查了2008年出版的六本生物学入门教材中的插图。平均而言,每本书中数百幅插图里呈现多步骤科学研究的不到5%。将如此小比例的插图用于展示发现的过程不利于对科学思维的强调。我们建议,通过大幅增加科学研究的插图,教材可以支持本科生早期对生物学的兴趣,促进设计和分析技能的发展,并激励一些学生参与他们自己的研究。

相似文献

1
Introductory biology textbooks under-represent scientific process.
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2011 Dec 1;12(2):143-51. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v12i2.307. Print 2011.
2
Data-rich textbook figures promote core competencies: Comparison of two textbooks.
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021 May;49(3):392-406. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21488. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
3
A One-Year Introductory Biology Majors' Lab Sequence Incorporating .
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2019 Apr 26;20(1). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v20i1.1636. eCollection 2019.
5
A scientist like me: demographic analysis of biology textbooks reveals both progress and long-term lags.
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 24;287(1929):20200877. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0877.
6
When Do Students "Learn-to-Comprehend" Scientific Sources?: Evaluation of a Critical Skill in Undergraduates Progressing through a Science Major.
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2015 May 1;16(1):13-20. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v16i1.828. eCollection 2015 May.
7
The effect and influence of undergraduate research on medical undergraduates in China.
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2019 Jan;47(1):41-50. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21194. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
9
Connecting biology and organic chemistry introductory laboratory courses through a collaborative research project.
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2015 Jul-Aug;43(4):233-44. doi: 10.1002/bmb.20871. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
10
Introducing student inquiry in large introductory genetics classes.
Genetics. 2004 Jan;166(1):11-8. doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.1.11.

引用本文的文献

1
Teaching the process of science with primary literature: Using the CREATE pedagogy in ecological courses.
Ecol Evol. 2022 Dec 21;12(12):e9644. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9644. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Data-rich textbook figures promote core competencies: Comparison of two textbooks.
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021 May;49(3):392-406. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21488. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
4
Lighten the Load: Scaffolding Visual Literacy in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Spring;16(1). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-06-0193.
6
Examining an online microbiology game as an effective tool for teaching the scientific process.
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2013 May 6;14(1):58-65. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v14i1.505. Print 2013.
9
Implementing recommendations for introductory biology by writing a new textbook.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2013 Spring;12(1):106-16. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-06-0086.

本文引用的文献

1
Meeting the challenge of science literacy: project 2061 efforts to improve science education.
Cell Biol Educ. 2004 Spring;3(1):28-30. doi: 10.1187/cbe.03-10-0016.
2
Arguing to learn in science: the role of collaborative, critical discourse.
Science. 2010 Apr 23;328(5977):463-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1183944.
3
Comparison of views of the nature of science between natural science and nonscience majors.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010 Spring;9(1):45-54. doi: 10.1187/cbe.09-05-0029.
5
Learning our L.I.M.I.T.S.: less is more in teaching science.
Adv Physiol Educ. 2009 Mar;33(1):17-20. doi: 10.1152/advan.90184.2008.
6
Community-based inquiry improves critical thinking in general education biology.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2008 Fall;7(3):327-37. doi: 10.1187/cbe.07-11-0097.
7
Identifying future scientists: predicting persistence into research training.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2007 Winter;6(4):316-31. doi: 10.1187/cbe.07-04-0020.
8
Doing more for Kate.
Science. 2005 Dec 16;310(5755):1741. doi: 10.1126/science.1123580.
10
Teaching more by lecturing less.
Cell Biol Educ. 2005 Winter;4(4):298-310. doi: 10.1187/05-06-0082.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验