Department of Optometry & Vision Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013 May;33(3):373-8. doi: 10.1111/opo.12052.
In the following point-counterpoint article, internationally-acclaimed myopia researchers were challenged to defend the two opposing sides of the topic defined by the title; their contributions, which appear in the order, Point followed by Counterpoint, were peer-reviewed by both the editorial team and an external reviewer. Independently of the invited authors, the named member of the editorial team provided an Introduction and Summary, both of which were reviewed by the other members of the editorial team. By their nature, views expressed in each section of the Point-Counterpoint article are those of the author concerned and may not reflect the views of all of the authors.
在这篇观点对立的文章中,国际知名的近视研究人员被要求为标题所定义的主题的两个对立面辩护;他们的贡献按观点和反观点的顺序发表,都经过了编辑团队和外部评审员的同行评审。与受邀作者无关,编辑团队的指定成员提供了引言和总结,这两个部分都经过了编辑团队其他成员的评审。观点对立文章各部分所表达的观点是相关作者的观点,不一定反映所有作者的观点。