Schmidt Susanne, Amereller Maximilian, Franz Matthias, Kaiser Ralf, Schwirtz Ansgar
BMW Group, Forschungs- und Innovationszentrum, Ergonomie und Komfort, Knorrstraße 147, 80788 Munich, Germany.
Appl Ergon. 2014 Mar;45(2):247-60. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 May 9.
In this study, a survey of the scientific literature in the field of optimum and preferred human joint angles in automotive sitting posture was conducted by referring to thirty different sources published between 1940 and today. The strategy was to use only sources with numerical angle data in combination with keywords. The aim of the research was to detect commonly used joint angles in interior car design. The main analysis was on data measurement, usability and comparability of the different studies. In addition, the focus was on the reasons for the differently described results. It was found that there is still a lack of information in methodology and description of background. Due to these reasons published data is not always usable to design a modern ergonomic car environment. As a main result of our literature analysis we suggest undertaking further research in the field of biomechanics and ergonomics to work out scientific based and objectively determined "optimum" joint angles in automotive sitting position.
在本研究中,通过参考1940年至现今发表的30种不同来源的文献,对汽车坐姿中最佳和优选人体关节角度领域的科学文献进行了调查。策略是仅使用带有数值角度数据并结合关键词的来源。该研究的目的是检测汽车内饰设计中常用的关节角度。主要分析了不同研究的数据测量、可用性和可比性。此外,重点关注结果描述不同的原因。结果发现,在方法学和背景描述方面仍然缺乏信息。由于这些原因,已发表的数据并不总是可用于设计现代人体工程学汽车环境。作为我们文献分析的主要结果,我们建议在生物力学和人体工程学领域开展进一步研究,以确定基于科学且客观确定的汽车坐姿“最佳”关节角度。