Krieglstein G K
Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1975;194(4 Suppl):221-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00414668.
Comparative measurements of intraocular pressure of 200 eyes were statistical analyzed. Goldmann applanation tonometry was performed by the author and was accepted as a reference system for the measurements made by a technician using the Pneumatonograph, the GlaucoTest screening tonometer, the Halberg tonometer and the Schiotz tonometer. The technician was trained in the use of these instruments for two days; The Pneumatonograph results on seated patients were in good agreement with the Goldmann readings. The GlaucoTest screening tonometer proved to be a good screening instrument for ocular hypertensives and required only a short period of training for the technician. The Halberg tonometer did not give precise readings of intraocular pressure, however, it was more difficult for technicians to use. The Sciotz tonometer appeared to be of limited value in screening tonometry. Some aspects of the influence of body position on i.o; pressure in the different tonometric procedures have been discussed.
对200只眼睛的眼压进行了对比测量，并进行了统计分析。作者采用Goldmann压平眼压计进行测量，并将其作为技术人员使用气动眼压计、青光眼筛查眼压计、哈尔伯格眼压计和施-氏眼压计测量结果的参考系统。该技术人员接受了为期两天的这些仪器使用培训；气动眼压计对坐位患者的测量结果与Goldmann测量值高度一致。青光眼筛查眼压计被证明是一种用于筛查高眼压症患者的良好仪器，并且技术人员只需经过短时间培训即可使用。然而，哈尔伯格眼压计无法给出精确的眼压读数，而且技术人员使用起来更加困难。施-氏眼压计在眼压筛查中似乎价值有限。本文还讨论了不同眼压测量程序中体位对眼压影响的一些方面。
