Suppr超能文献

社区伙伴参与评价在洛杉矶资源匮乏社区的社区机构的客户的抑郁服务。

Community-partnered evaluation of depression services for clients of community-based agencies in under-resourced communities in Los Angeles.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, USA,

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Oct;28(10):1279-87. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2480-7. Epub 2013 May 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As medical homes are developing under health reform, little is known regarding depression services need and use by diverse safety-net populations in under-resourced communities. For chronic conditions like depression, primary care services may face new opportunities to partner with diverse community service providers, such as those in social service and substance abuse centers, to support a collaborative care model of treating depression.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the distribution of need and current burden of services for depression in under-resourced, diverse communities in Los Angeles.

DESIGN

Baseline phase of a participatory trial to improve depression services with data from client screening and follow-up surveys.

PARTICIPANTS

Of 4,440 clients screened from 93 programs (primary care, mental health, substance abuse, homeless, social and other community services) in 50 agencies, 1,322 were depressed according to an eight-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) and gave contact information; 1,246 enrolled and 981 completed surveys. Ninety-three programs, including 17 primary care/public health, 18 mental health, 20 substance abuse, ten homeless services, and 28 social/other community services, participated.

MAIN MEASURES

Comparisons by setting in 6-month retrospective recall of depression services use.

KEY RESULTS

Depression prevalence ranged from 51.9 % in mental health to 17.2 % in social-community programs. Depressed clients used two settings on average to receive depression services; 82 % used any setting. More clients preferred counseling over medication for depression treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Need for depression care was high, and a broad range of agencies provide depression care. Although most participants had contact with primary care, most depression services occurred outside of primary care settings, emphasizing the need to coordinate and support the quality of community-based services across diverse community settings.

摘要

背景

随着医疗改革的推进,医疗之家正在发展,但对于资源匮乏社区中不同的医疗保障人群的抑郁服务需求和使用情况,我们知之甚少。对于像抑郁这样的慢性疾病,基层医疗服务可能会有新的机会与不同的社区服务提供者(如社会服务和药物滥用中心的提供者)合作,以支持治疗抑郁的协作式护理模式。

目的

了解洛杉矶资源匮乏、多样化社区中抑郁服务需求的分布情况和现有服务负担。

设计

这是一项参与性试验的基线阶段,旨在通过客户筛查和随访调查数据来改善抑郁服务。

参与者

在 50 个机构的 93 个项目(包括基层医疗、精神卫生、药物滥用、无家可归、社会和其他社区服务)中,对 4440 名患者进行了筛查,其中有 1322 名根据八项患者健康问卷(PHQ-8)筛查为抑郁患者,并提供了联系方式;有 1246 名患者入组,981 名患者完成了调查。共有 93 个项目参与其中,包括 17 个基层医疗/公共卫生项目、18 个精神卫生项目、20 个药物滥用项目、10 个无家可归者服务项目和 28 个社会/其他社区服务项目。

主要措施

通过 6 个月的抑郁服务使用情况回顾性回忆,按设置进行比较。

主要结果

抑郁的患病率从精神卫生项目的 51.9%到社会-社区项目的 17.2%不等。抑郁患者平均使用两种设置接受抑郁治疗;82%的患者使用了任何一种设置。更多的患者更愿意接受咨询而不是药物治疗抑郁。

结论

对抑郁治疗的需求很高,有广泛的机构提供抑郁治疗。尽管大多数参与者都与基层医疗有过接触,但大多数抑郁治疗服务都发生在基层医疗环境之外,这强调了需要协调和支持不同社区环境中基于社区的服务的质量。

相似文献

8

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验