Suppr超能文献

单视图数字乳腺断层合成加单视图数字乳腺 X 线摄影与双视图数字乳腺 X 线摄影的性能比较。

Performance comparison of single-view digital breast tomosynthesis plus single-view digital mammography with two-view digital mammography.

机构信息

Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV)-IRCCS, via Gattamelata 64, 35128 Padua, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2013 Mar;23(3):664-72. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2649-1. Epub 2012 Sep 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the performance of combined single-view mediolateral oblique (MLO) digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus single-view cranio-caudal (CC) mammography (MX) compared with that of standard two-view digital mammography.

METHODS

A multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) study was conducted, involving six breast radiologists. Two hundred fifty patients underwent bilateral MX and DBT imaging. MX and DBT images with the adjunct of the CC-MX view from 469 breasts were evaluated and rated independently by six readers. Differences in mean areas under the ROC curves (AUCs), mean sensitivity and mean specificity were analysed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) to assess clinical performance.

RESULTS

The combined technique was found to be non-inferior to standard two-view mammography (MX((CC+MLO))) in mean AUC (difference: +0.021;95 % LCL = -0.011), but was not statistically significant for superiority (P = 0.197). The combined technique had equivalent sensitivity to standard mammography (76.2 % vs. 72.8 %, P = 0.269) and equivalent specificity (84.9 % vs. 83.0 %, P = 0.130). Specificity for benign lesions was significantly higher with the combination of techniques versus mammography (45.6 % vs. 36.8 %, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

In this enriched study population, the combination of single-view MLO tomosynthesis plus single-view CC mammography was non-inferior to that of standard two-view digital mammography in terms of ROC curve area, sensitivity and specificity.

摘要

目的

评估单视角斜侧位(MLO)数字乳腺断层合成摄影(DBT)加单视角头尾位(CC)乳腺摄影(MX)联合应用的性能,与标准双视角数字乳腺摄影比较。

方法

采用多读者多病例(MRMC)受试者工作特征(ROC)研究,涉及 6 名乳腺放射科医生。250 例患者行双侧 MX 和 DBT 成像。对 469 个乳房的 MX 和 DBT 图像,以及附加的 CC-MX 视图进行评估,由 6 名读者独立评估和评分。采用方差分析(ANOVA)分析平均 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)、平均敏感度和平均特异度的差异,以评估临床性能。

结果

联合技术在平均 AUC 方面不劣于标准双视角乳腺摄影(MX((CC+MLO)))(差异:+0.021;95%可信区间下限= -0.011),但无统计学意义(P = 0.197)。联合技术的敏感度与标准乳腺摄影相当(76.2% vs. 72.8%,P = 0.269),特异度相当(84.9% vs. 83.0%,P = 0.130)。联合技术对良性病变的特异度显著高于乳腺摄影(45.6% vs. 36.8%,P = 0.002)。

结论

在这个丰富的研究人群中,单视角 MLO 断层合成摄影加单视角 CC 乳腺摄影的组合在 ROC 曲线面积、敏感度和特异度方面不劣于标准双视角数字乳腺摄影。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验