Department of Pediatrics, Division of Academic General Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA.
Acad Pediatr. 2013 May-Jun;13(3):214-21. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
To examine whether infrequent bullying perpetration and victimization (once or twice a month) are associated with elevated levels of internalizing and externalizing problems and to assess evidence for a minimum frequency threshold for bullying involvement.
The analytic sample included 128,681 6th, 9th, and 12th graders who completed the 2010 Minnesota Student Survey. Logistic regression and general linear models examined the association between bullying frequency and adjustment correlates including emotional distress, self-harm, physical fighting, and substance use while controlling for demographic characteristics. Gender and grade were included as moderators.
Infrequent bullying perpetration and victimization were associated with increased levels of all adjustment problems relative to those who did not engage in bullying in the past 30 days. Grade moderated many of these findings, with perpetration frequency being more strongly related to substance use, self-harm, and suicidal ideation for 6th graders than 12th graders, whereas victimization frequency was associated with self-harm more strongly for 12th graders than 6th graders. Evidence for minimum thresholds for bullying involvement across all outcomes, grades, and bullying roles was inconsistent.
Infrequent bullying involvement may pose risks to adolescent adjustment; thus, clinicians and school personnel should address even isolated instances of bullying behavior. Researchers should reexamine the use of cut points in bullying research in order to more fully understand the nature of bullying in adolescence. These data indicate the need for prevention and intervention programs that target diverse internalizing and externalizing problems for bullies and victims, regardless of bullying frequency.
探讨偶发的欺凌行为(每月 1-2 次)是否与内化和外化问题的严重程度有关,并评估欺凌行为参与的最低频率阈值的证据。
分析样本包括 128681 名 6、9 和 12 年级的学生,他们完成了 2010 年明尼苏达州学生调查。逻辑回归和一般线性模型考察了欺凌频率与调整相关因素(包括情绪困扰、自我伤害、身体打架和物质使用)之间的关联,同时控制了人口统计学特征。性别和年级作为调节因素。
偶发的欺凌行为与所有调整问题的发生率增加有关,而与过去 30 天内没有参与欺凌行为的学生相比。年级调节了许多发现,与 12 年级相比,6 年级的欺凌行为频率与物质使用、自我伤害和自杀意念的相关性更强,而与 12 年级相比,6 年级的欺凌行为频率与自我伤害的相关性更强。所有结果、年级和欺凌角色的欺凌参与最低阈值的证据不一致。
偶发的欺凌行为可能对青少年的调整构成风险;因此,临床医生和学校工作人员应该解决即使是孤立的欺凌行为。研究人员应该重新审视欺凌行为研究中使用的切点,以便更全面地了解青少年时期的欺凌行为的性质。这些数据表明,需要针对欺凌者和受害者的各种内化和外化问题制定预防和干预计划,而不论欺凌行为的频率如何。