Suppr超能文献

晚期早产儿汽车座椅测试失败的相关因素:一项回顾性图表审查。

Factors associated with car seat test failure in late preterm infants: A retrospective chart review.

作者信息

Smith Ryan W, Mohamed Adel, Young Jennifer, Jefferies Ann, Shah Vibhuti

机构信息

Department of General Paediatrics, Toronto, Ontario;; The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario;

Department of Paediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario.

出版信息

Paediatr Child Health. 2016 Jan-Feb;21(1):16-20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Professional organizations recommend car seat testing of preterm infants before discharge from hospital. Late preterm infants (LPIs, 34(0/7) to 36(6/7) weeks' gestational age) are at the greatest risk for failure, despite often being well.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of car seat testing failure in LPIs and associative factors.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of inborn LPIs admitted to all levels of newborn care between July 1, 2012 and June 30, 2013. Data collected included maternal demographics, labour and delivery history, and neonatal course. Data were analyzed using backward logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 511 charts were reviewed and 367 LPIs were eligible for inclusion. Of the 313 LPIs tested (mean [± SD] gestational age 36 weeks ±6 days and birth weight 2614±405 g), 80 (26%) failed (95% CI 21% to 31%). Most failed due to desaturations (≥2) of <88% for ≥10 s (n=33 [41%]). Multiple gestation was associated with failure (adjusted OR 2.45 [95% CI 1.44 to 4.18]; P=0.001), and there was a trend toward statistical significance for the variable postnatal age (0.996 [95% CI 0.99 to 1.00]; P=0.05). Infants who passed their car seat test had higher postnatal ages than those who failed (mean difference 39.4 h [95% CI 12.7 h to 66.0 h]; P=0.004).

CONCLUSION

Twenty-six percent of LPIs failed car seat testing. Ideally, infants should be tested after an appropriate transitional period. The authors identified factors that may be important in designing future, prospective studies in this area. Future research should evaluate the clinical significance of car seat testing and resource utilization.

摘要

背景

专业组织建议对早产儿在出院前进行汽车座椅测试。晚期早产儿(LPI,胎龄34(0/7)至36(6/7)周)尽管通常情况良好,但测试失败风险最高。

目的

确定晚期早产儿汽车座椅测试失败的发生率及相关因素。

方法

对2012年7月1日至2013年6月30日期间入住各级新生儿护理病房的足月出生晚期早产儿进行回顾性病历审查。收集的数据包括产妇人口统计学资料、分娩史和新生儿病程。采用向后逻辑回归分析数据。

结果

共审查了511份病历,367名晚期早产儿符合纳入标准。在接受测试的313名晚期早产儿中(平均[±标准差]胎龄36周±6天,出生体重2614±405克),80名(26%)测试失败(95%可信区间21%至31%)。大多数失败是由于血氧饱和度下降(≥2次)至<88%持续≥10秒(n = 33[41%])。多胎妊娠与测试失败相关(调整后的比值比2.45[95%可信区间1.44至4.18];P = 0.001),出生后年龄这一变量有统计学意义的趋势(0.996[95%可信区间0.99至1.00];P = 0.05)。通过汽车座椅测试的婴儿出生后年龄高于测试失败的婴儿(平均差异39.4小时[95%可信区间12.7小时至66.0小时];P = 0.004)。

结论

26%的晚期早产儿汽车座椅测试失败。理想情况下,婴儿应在适当的过渡期后进行测试。作者确定了在设计该领域未来前瞻性研究中可能重要的因素。未来研究应评估汽车座椅测试的临床意义和资源利用情况。

相似文献

2
Epidemiology and predictors of failure of the infant car seat challenge.
Pediatrics. 2013 May;131(5):951-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2775. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
3
Clinical Outcomes Associated with a Failed Infant Car Seat Challenge.
J Pediatr. 2017 Jan;180:130-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.09.072. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
4
Weight and age as predictors for passing the infant car seat challenge.
Pediatrics. 2010 Mar;125(3):526-31. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1715. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
5
Pre-hospital discharge car safety seat testing in infants following congenital heart surgery.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2008 Mar;29(2):313-6. doi: 10.1007/s00246-007-9021-2. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
6
Car Seat Tolerance Screening in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Failure Rates, Risk Factors, and Adverse Outcomes.
J Pediatr. 2018 Mar;194:60-66.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
7
Prehospital discharge car safety seat testing of infants after congenital heart surgery.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2008 Jan;29(1):142-5. doi: 10.1007/s00246-007-9065-3. Epub 2007 Sep 5.
8
Car Seat Tolerance Screening for Late-Preterm Infants.
Pediatrics. 2020 Jan;145(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-1703.
9
Respiratory instability of term and near-term healthy newborn infants in car safety seats.
Pediatrics. 2001 Sep;108(3):647-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.3.647.
10
Car seat challenges: where are we in implementation of these programs?
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2003 Apr-Jun;17(2):158-63. doi: 10.1097/00005237-200304000-00008.

引用本文的文献

1
The Association Between Routine Car Seat Screening and Subsequent Health Care Utilization.
Hosp Pediatr. 2022 Nov 1;12(11):913-922. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2021-006509.

本文引用的文献

1
Car seat safety for preterm neonates: implementation and testing parameters of the infant car seat challenge.
Acad Pediatr. 2013 May-Jun;13(3):272-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.01.009. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
2
A review of normal values of infant sleep polysomnography.
Pediatr Neonatol. 2013 Apr;54(2):82-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2012.11.011. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
3
Epidemiology and predictors of failure of the infant car seat challenge.
Pediatrics. 2013 May;131(5):951-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2775. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
4
Physiologic basis for intermittent hypoxic episodes in preterm infants.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;758:351-8. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-4584-1_47.
5
Intermittent hypoxic episodes in preterm infants: do they matter?
Neonatology. 2011;100(3):303-10. doi: 10.1159/000329922. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
6
Longitudinal assessment of hemoglobin oxygen saturation in preterm and term infants in the first six months of life.
J Pediatr. 2011 Sep;159(3):377-383.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.02.011. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
7
Assessment of babies for car seat safety before hospital discharge.
Paediatr Child Health. 2000 Jan;5(1):53-63. doi: 10.1093/pch/5.1.53.
8
Safe transportation of preterm and low birth weight infants at hospital discharge.
Pediatrics. 2009 May;123(5):1424-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0559.
9
Sudden infant deaths in sitting devices.
Arch Dis Child. 2008 May;93(5):384-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.119180. Epub 2007 Jul 19.
10
Car seat test for preterm infants: comparison with polysomnography.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 Nov;92(6):F468-72. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.109488. Epub 2007 Apr 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验