Department of Preventive Medicine, Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies (CBITs), Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Psychol Med. 2014 Jan;44(2):349-59. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713000755. Epub 2013 May 17.
Stressful life events have long been suspected to contribute to multiple sclerosis (MS) disease activity. The few studies examining the relationship between stressful events and neuroimaging markers have been small and inconsistent. This study examined whether different types of stressful events and perceived stress could predict the development of brain lesions.
This was a secondary analysis of 121 patients with MS followed for 48 weeks during a randomized controlled trial comparing stress management therapy for MS (SMT-MS) to a waitlist control (WLC). Patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans every 8 weeks. Every month, patients completed an interview measure assessing stressful life events and self-report measures of perceived stress, anxiety and depressive symptoms, which were used to predict the presence of gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) and T2 lesions on MRI scans 29-62 days later. Participants classified stressful events as positive or negative. Negative events were considered 'major' if they involved physical threat or threat to the patient's family structure, and 'moderate' otherwise.
Positive stressful events predicted decreased risk for subsequent Gd+ lesions in the control group [odds ratio (OR) 0.53 for each additional positive stressful event, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-0.91] and less risk for new or enlarging T2 lesions regardless of group assignment (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-0.99). Across groups, major negative stressful events predicted Gd+ lesions (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.18-2.64) and new or enlarging T2 lesions (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.11-2.23) whereas moderate negative stressful events, perceived stress, anxiety and depressive symptoms did not.
Major negative stressful events predict increased risk for Gd+ and T2 lesions whereas positive stressful events predict decreased risk.
长期以来,人们一直怀疑应激性生活事件会导致多发性硬化症(MS)的疾病活动。少数研究应激事件与神经影像学标志物之间关系的研究规模较小且结果不一致。本研究旨在探讨不同类型的应激事件和感知到的压力是否可预测脑损伤的发生。
这是一项对 121 例多发性硬化症患者的二次分析,这些患者在一项比较多发性硬化症应激管理治疗(SMT-MS)与等待对照(WLC)的随机对照试验中随访了 48 周。患者每 8 周接受一次磁共振成像(MRI)扫描。每个月,患者完成一次访谈,评估生活中的应激事件,以及自我报告的感知压力、焦虑和抑郁症状,这些症状用于预测 MRI 扫描后 29-62 天出现钆增强(Gd+)和 T2 病变的情况。参与者将应激事件分类为阳性或阴性。如果事件涉及身体威胁或威胁到患者的家庭结构,则将负面事件视为“重大”,否则为“中度”。
在对照组中,积极的应激事件预测随后发生 Gd+病变的风险降低[每增加一个积极的应激事件,优势比(OR)为 0.53,95%置信区间(CI)为 0.30-0.91],且无论分组如何,新的或扩大的 T2 病变的风险均降低(OR 0.74,95%CI 0.55-0.99)。在两组中,重大负面应激事件预测 Gd+病变(OR 1.77,95%CI 1.18-2.64)和新的或扩大的 T2 病变(OR 1.57,95%CI 1.11-2.23),而中度负面应激事件、感知压力、焦虑和抑郁症状则没有。
重大负面应激事件预测 Gd+和 T2 病变的风险增加,而积极的应激事件则预测风险降低。