• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Posttraumatic stress disorder in survivors of acute lung injury: evaluating the Impact of Event Scale-Revised.急性肺损伤幸存者的创伤后应激障碍:评估修订后的事件影响量表。
Chest. 2013 Jul;144(1):24-31. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-0908.
2
Screening for posttraumatic stress disorder in ARDS survivors: validation of the Impact of Event Scale-6 (IES-6).对急性呼吸窘迫综合征幸存者进行创伤后应激障碍筛查:事件影响量表 6 版(IES-6)的验证。
Crit Care. 2019 Aug 7;23(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2553-z.
3
Post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms after acute lung injury: a 2-year prospective longitudinal study.急性肺损伤后创伤后应激障碍症状:一项为期 2 年的前瞻性纵向研究。
Psychol Med. 2013 Dec;43(12):2657-71. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713000214. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
4
The SF-36 Offers a Strong Measure of Mental Health Symptoms in Survivors of Acute Respiratory Failure. A Tri-National Analysis.SF-36量表对急性呼吸衰竭幸存者的心理健康症状有很强的测量作用。一项三国分析。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Aug;13(8):1343-50. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201510-705OC.
5
Cooccurrence of and remission from general anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms after acute lung injury: a 2-year longitudinal study.急性肺损伤后广泛性焦虑、抑郁和创伤后应激障碍症状的共现与缓解:一项为期2年的纵向研究。
Crit Care Med. 2015 Mar;43(3):642-53. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000752.
6
Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised.《事件影响量表修订版》韩文版的信效度
Compr Psychiatry. 2009 Jul-Aug;50(4):385-90. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.09.011. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
7
Evaluating a screener to quantify PTSD risk using emergency care information: a proof of concept study.利用急诊信息评估 PTSD 风险筛查器:概念验证研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Mar 2;20(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00308-z.
8
Aspects of posttraumatic stress disorder in long-term testicular cancer survivors: cross-sectional and longitudinal findings.长期睾丸癌幸存者的创伤后应激障碍相关方面:横断面研究与纵向研究结果
J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Oct;10(5):842-9. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0529-4. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
9
Screening for PTSD in motor vehicle accident survivors using the PSS-SR and IES.使用创伤后应激障碍自评量表简版(PSS-SR)和事件影响量表(IES)对机动车事故幸存者进行创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)筛查。
J Trauma Stress. 2006 Feb;19(1):119-28. doi: 10.1002/jts.20106.
10
Comparative analysis of the Japanese version of the revised impact of event scale: a study of firefighters.修订版事件影响量表日文版的比较分析:一项针对消防员的研究
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008 May-Jun;23(3):s20-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence and Associated Risk Factors for Falls in Adults Following Critical Illness: An Observational Study.危重症成年患者跌倒的发生率及相关危险因素:一项观察性研究
Crit Care Med. 2025 Jun 1;53(6):e1257-e1268. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006668. Epub 2025 Apr 18.
2
Holistic Patient-Centered Outcomes in Post-Acute Kidney Injury Care: Physical, Emotional, Cognitive, and Social Outcomes.急性肾损伤后护理中的整体以患者为中心的结局:身体、情感、认知和社会结局。
Adv Kidney Dis Health. 2025 Mar;32(2):162-178. doi: 10.1053/j.akdh.2024.10.001.
3
Psychological symptoms, quality of life and dyadic relations in family members of intensive care survivors: a multicentre, prospective longitudinal cohort study.重症监护幸存者家庭成员的心理症状、生活质量和二元关系:一项多中心、前瞻性纵向队列研究。
Ann Intensive Care. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01420-8.
4
Evaluating Mental Health Outcomes in COVID-19 ICU Survivors: A Scoping Review of Measurement Tools.评估新冠病毒肺炎重症监护病房幸存者的心理健康结果:测量工具的范围综述
J Clin Med. 2024 May 29;13(11):3191. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113191.
5
Pain and psychopathology after intensive care unit admission.入住重症监护病房后的疼痛和精神病理学。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2024 Jul;52(4):232-240. doi: 10.1177/0310057X241226716. Epub 2024 Jun 16.
6
A randomised controlled trial of a nurse facilitator to promote communication for family members of critically ill patients.一项护士促进者促进危重症患者家属沟通的随机对照试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 May;50(5):712-724. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07390-y. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
7
Instruments to assess post-intensive care syndrome assessment: a scoping review and modified Delphi method study.评估 ICU 后综合征的评估工具:范围综述和改良 Delphi 方法研究。
Crit Care. 2023 Nov 7;27(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04681-6.
8
Two Years after the Beginning of COVID-19: Comparing Families Who Had or Did not Have Patients with COVID-19 on Health Beliefs and Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms.新冠疫情开始两年后:比较家中有或没有新冠患者的家庭在健康信念和强迫症状方面的情况。
Iran J Psychiatry. 2023 Oct;18(4):429-442. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v18i4.13630.
9
Risk factors for post-traumatic stress disorder among young and middle-aged cancer patients in the intensive care unit: A case-control study.重症监护病房中青年癌症患者创伤后应激障碍的危险因素:一项病例对照研究。
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Sep 6;11(25):5870-5877. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i25.5870.
10
Emotional, mental health and physical symptom experience of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 up to 3 months post-hospitalization: A longitudinal study.COVID-19 住院患者出院后 3 个月内的情绪、心理健康和身体症状体验:一项纵向研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Feb;33(2):591-605. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16880. Epub 2023 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Family response to critical illness: postintensive care syndrome-family.家庭对重病的反应:重症监护后综合征家庭。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):618-24. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318236ebf9.
2
Considering PTSD for DSM-5. 考虑 PTSD 纳入 DSM-5 。
Depress Anxiety. 2011 Sep;28(9):750-69. doi: 10.1002/da.20767. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
3
Anxiety disorders diagnosis: some history and controversies.焦虑症的诊断:一些历史与争议
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2010;2:3-19. doi: 10.1007/7854_2009_4.
4
Early intra-intensive care unit psychological intervention promotes recovery from post traumatic stress disorders, anxiety and depression symptoms in critically ill patients.早期重症监护室内心理干预可促进重症患者创伤后应激障碍、焦虑和抑郁症状的康复。
Crit Care. 2011;15(1):R41. doi: 10.1186/cc10003. Epub 2011 Jan 27.
5
Intensive care diaries reduce new onset post traumatic stress disorder following critical illness: a randomised, controlled trial.重症监护日记可降低危重病后新发创伤后应激障碍:一项随机对照试验。
Crit Care. 2010;14(5):R168. doi: 10.1186/cc9260. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
6
The diagnostic accuracy of the PTSD checklist: a critical review.创伤后应激障碍检查表的诊断准确性:批判性评价。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Dec;30(8):976-87. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.06.012. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
7
Validation of a Swedish version of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) in patients with burns.验证修订后的事件影响量表(IES-R)在烧伤患者中的瑞典版本。
J Anxiety Disord. 2010 Aug;24(6):618-22. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.03.021. Epub 2010 Apr 12.
8
Posttraumatic stress disorder in general intensive care unit survivors: a systematic review.综合重症监护病房幸存者的创伤后应激障碍:一项系统综述
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2008 Sep-Oct;30(5):421-34. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2008.05.006. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
9
Psychometric properties of the IES-R in traumatized substance dependent individuals with and without PTSD.创伤后应激障碍患者与非创伤后应激障碍患者中,创伤事件影响量表修订版(IES-R)在受创伤的物质依赖个体中的心理测量特性。
Addict Behav. 2008 Aug;33(8):1039-47. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.04.006. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
10
Psychometric properties of seven self-report measures of posttraumatic stress disorder in college students with mixed civilian trauma exposure.遭受多种平民创伤的大学生中七种创伤后应激障碍自评量表的心理测量特性。
J Anxiety Disord. 2008 Dec;22(8):1393-402. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Feb 29.

急性肺损伤幸存者的创伤后应激障碍:评估修订后的事件影响量表。

Posttraumatic stress disorder in survivors of acute lung injury: evaluating the Impact of Event Scale-Revised.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baltimore, MD; Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Baltimore, MD; Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Chest. 2013 Jul;144(1):24-31. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-0908.

DOI:10.1378/chest.12-0908
PMID:23699588
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4694105/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Survivors of acute lung injury (ALI) and other critical illnesses often experience substantial posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. However, most questionnaires have not been validated against a PTSD diagnostic reference standard in this patient population. Hence, in the current study of survivors of ALI, we evaluated the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R), a questionnaire measure of PTSD symptoms, against the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS), the current state-of-the-art PTSD diagnostic reference standard, which also provides a quantitative assessment of PTSD symptoms.

METHODS

We evaluated the IES-R questionnaire vs the CAPS diagnostic interview in 60 of 77 consecutively recruited survivors of ALI from two prospective cohort studies of patients 1 to 5 years after ALI.

RESULTS

The IES-R total score (range: 0.0-3.2) and the CAPS total severity score (range: 0-70) were strongly related (Pearson r=0.80, Spearman ρ=0.69). Using CAPS data, eight of the 60 patients (13%) had PTSD at the time of assessment, and an additional eight patients had partial PTSD (total prevalence, 27%). In a receiver operating characteristics curve analysis with CAPS PTSD or partial PTSD as criterion variables, the area under the curve ranged from 95% (95% CI, 88%-100%) to 97% (95% CI, 92%-100%). At an IES-R threshold of 1.6, with the same criterion variables, sensitivities ranged from 80% to 100%, specificities 85% to 91%, positive predictive values 50% to 75%, negative predictive values 93% to 100%, positive likelihood ratios 6.5 to 9.0, negative likelihood ratios 0.0 to 0.2, and efficiencies 87% to 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

The IES-R appears to be an excellent brief PTSD symptom measure and screening tool in ALI survivors.

摘要

背景

急性肺损伤(ALI)和其他危重病幸存者经常经历大量创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状。然而,大多数问卷都没有针对这一患者群体的 PTSD 诊断参考标准进行验证。因此,在目前对 ALI 幸存者的研究中,我们评估了修订后的事件影响量表(IES-R),这是一种 PTSD 症状问卷测量工具,与目前最先进的 PTSD 诊断参考标准临床医生管理 PTSD 量表(CAPS)相对照,该量表还提供了 PTSD 症状的定量评估。

方法

我们评估了 IES-R 问卷与 CAPS 诊断访谈在 77 名连续招募的 ALI 幸存者中的 60 名,这是两个前瞻性队列研究的患者,时间为 ALI 后 1 至 5 年。

结果

IES-R 总分(范围:0.0-3.2)和 CAPS 总严重程度评分(范围:0-70)之间存在很强的相关性(Pearson r=0.80,Spearman ρ=0.69)。使用 CAPS 数据,60 名患者中有 8 名(13%)在评估时患有 PTSD,另外 8 名患者患有部分 PTSD(总患病率为 27%)。在以 CAPS PTSD 或部分 PTSD 为标准变量的受试者工作特征曲线分析中,曲线下面积范围为 95%(95%CI,88%-100%)至 97%(95%CI,92%-100%)。在 IES-R 阈值为 1.6 的情况下,使用相同的标准变量,灵敏度范围为 80%至 100%,特异性为 85%至 91%,阳性预测值为 50%至 75%,阴性预测值为 93%至 100%,阳性似然比为 6.5 至 9.0,阴性似然比为 0.0 至 0.2,效率为 87%至 90%。

结论

IES-R 似乎是一种优秀的 ALI 幸存者 PTSD 症状简短测量和筛查工具。