Suppr超能文献

有或无非风湿性心房颤动的脑缺血患者的CT比较。欧洲心房颤动试验和荷兰短暂性脑缺血发作试验研究组。

Comparison of CT in patients with cerebral ischaemia with or without non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation. European Atrial Fibrillation Trial and Dutch T I A Trial Study Groups.

作者信息

van Latum J, Koudstaal P J, Kappelle L J, van Kooten F, Algra A, van Gijn J

机构信息

University Hospital Rotterdam Dijkzigt, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995 Aug;59(2):132-7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.59.2.132.

Abstract

In an attempt to distinguish between the CT characteristics of strokes of presumed cardioembolic origin and strokes caused by arterial disease, a comparison was made between the baseline CT of two prospective cohorts of patients with transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke, with (n = 985) or without (n = 2987) non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation (NRAF). Of the patients with NRAF 54% had evidence of cerebral infarction v 41% of the controls (patients with sinus rhythm (SR); odds ratio (OR) 1.7; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.4-1.9). Patients with NRAF more often had multiple infarcts (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.8), and more often infarcts that were not related to current neurological symptoms (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.2-1.8). For symptomatic infarcts, patients with NRAF more often had cortical end zone infarcts (OR 3.1; 95% CI 2.6-3.8) and cortical border zone infarcts (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.3-2.9) than patients with SR. Conversely, symptomatic small deep infarcts (lacunae) were more often seen in patients with SR (OR 3.9; 95% CI 2.8-5.4). Multivariate analyses showed that all these findings were independent of differences in baseline characteristics between the two study groups. The CT characteristics overlapped and did not allow a reliable distinction between cardioembolic and atherosclerotic causes of stroke in patients with NRAF.

摘要

为了区分疑似心源性栓塞性卒中与动脉疾病所致卒中的CT特征,对两组前瞻性队列的短暂性脑缺血发作或轻度缺血性卒中患者的基线CT进行了比较,一组有(n = 985)非风湿性心房颤动(NRAF),另一组无(n = 2987)。有NRAF的患者中54%有脑梗死证据,而对照组(窦性心律(SR)患者)为41%(比值比(OR)1.7;95%置信区间(95%CI)1.4 - 1.9)。有NRAF的患者更常出现多发性梗死(OR 1.4;95%CI 1.1 - 1.8),且梗死更常与当前神经症状无关(OR 1.5;95%CI 1.2 - 1.8)。对于有症状的梗死,有NRAF的患者比有SR的患者更常出现皮质终末区梗死(OR 3.1;95%CI 2.6 - 3.8)和皮质边缘区梗死(OR 1.9;95%CI 1.3 - 2.9)。相反,有症状的小的深部梗死(腔隙性梗死)在有SR的患者中更常见(OR 3.9;95%CI 2.8 - 5.4)。多变量分析表明,所有这些发现均独立于两个研究组之间基线特征的差异。CT特征存在重叠,无法可靠地区分NRAF患者卒中的心源性栓塞和动脉粥样硬化病因。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Blood pressure does no predict lacunar infarction.血压不能预测腔隙性脑梗死。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1982 Feb;45(2):147-50. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.45.2.147.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验