St George's, University of London, London, UK.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 May 24;13:188. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-188.
The provision of peer support as a component of mental health care, including the employment of Peer Workers (consumer-providers) by mental health service organisations, is increasingly common internationally. Peer support is strongly advocated as a strategy in a number of UK health and social care policies. Approaches to employing Peer Workers are proliferating. There is evidence to suggest that Peer Worker-based interventions reduce psychiatric inpatient admission and increase service user (consumer) empowerment. In this paper we seek to address a gap in the empirical literature in understanding the organisational challenges and benefits of introducing Peer Worker roles into mental health service teams.
We report the secondary analysis of qualitative interview data from service users, Peer Workers, non-peer staff and managers of three innovative interventions in a study about mental health self-care. Relevant data was extracted from interviews with 41 participants and subjected to analysis using Grounded Theory techniques. Organisational research literature on role adoption framed the analysis.
Peer Workers were highly valued by mental health teams and service users. Non-peer team members and managers worked hard to introduce Peer Workers into teams. Our cases were projects in development and there was learning from the evolutionary process: in the absence of formal recruitment processes for Peer Workers, differences in expectations of the Peer Worker role can emerge at the selection stage; flexible working arrangements for Peer Workers can have the unintended effect of perpetuating hierarchies within teams; the maintenance of protective practice boundaries through supervision and training can militate against the emergence of a distinctive body of peer practice; lack of consensus around what constitutes peer practice can result in feelings for Peer Workers of inequality, disempowerment, uncertainty about identity and of being under-supported.
This research is indicative of potential benefits for mental health service teams of introducing Peer Worker roles. Analysis also suggests that if the emergence of a distinctive body of peer practice is not adequately considered and supported, as integral to the development of new Peer Worker roles, there is a risk that the potential impact of any emerging role will be constrained and diluted.
同伴支持作为精神卫生保健的一个组成部分,包括精神卫生服务组织雇用同伴工作者(消费者提供者),在国际上越来越普遍。同伴支持作为一项策略在许多英国卫生和社会保健政策中得到大力提倡。采用同伴工作者的方法正在迅速增多。有证据表明,基于同伴工作者的干预措施可以减少精神科住院人数,增强服务使用者(消费者)的权能。在本文中,我们试图解决理解将同伴工作者角色引入精神卫生服务团队的组织挑战和益处方面的实证文献中的空白。
我们报告了对一项关于精神卫生自我保健的研究中三个创新干预措施的服务使用者、同伴工作者、非同伴工作人员和管理人员的定性访谈数据的二次分析。从 41 名参与者的访谈中提取了相关数据,并使用扎根理论技术进行了分析。角色采用的组织研究文献为分析提供了框架。
同伴工作者受到精神卫生团队和服务使用者的高度重视。非同伴团队成员和管理人员努力将同伴工作者引入团队。我们的案例是正在发展中的项目,因此可以从进化过程中学习:在没有为同伴工作者制定正式招聘流程的情况下,在选拔阶段可能会出现对同伴工作者角色的期望差异;为同伴工作者提供灵活的工作安排可能会无意中导致团队内部的等级制度永久化;通过监督和培训来维护保护实践边界可以抵制独特的同伴实践的出现;缺乏对同伴实践构成的共识可能会导致同伴工作者感到不平等、无权、对身份不确定和支持不足。
这项研究表明,为精神卫生服务团队引入同伴工作者角色可能会带来潜在的好处。分析还表明,如果没有充分考虑和支持新兴的独特的同伴实践,就像发展新的同伴工作者角色一样,那么任何新兴角色的潜在影响都可能受到限制和削弱。