Suppr超能文献

唾液抗氧化剂作为评估牙周组织状态和治疗效果的生物标志物。

Salivary antioxidants as periodontal biomarkers in evaluation of tissue status and treatment outcome.

作者信息

Novakovic N, Todorovic T, Rakic M, Milinkovic I, Dozic I, Jankovic S, Aleksic Z, Cakic S

机构信息

Department for Periodontology and Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

J Periodontal Res. 2014 Feb;49(1):129-36. doi: 10.1111/jre.12088. Epub 2013 May 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

One of the major pathologic patterns in periodontitis represents an imbalance among the production of free radicals and local antioxidants resulting in periodontal tissue destruction. The objective of the study was to investigate the influence of non-surgical periodontal treatment on salivary antioxidants and to evaluate their capacity as biomarkers reflecting periodontal tissue condition and therapy outcome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty-three systemically healthy non-smokers, including 21 periodontally healthy subjects (HC) and 42 patients with current chronic periodontitis fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Half of the patients received scaling and root planing (SRP) and the other half received only oral hygiene instructions. Full mouth clinical measurements, including gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI), periodontal pocket depth, clinical attachment level and saliva sampling were performed at baseline visit and 2 mo after treatment/baseline visit. Total antioxidant capacity (TAOC), albumins (ALB), uric acid (UA), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX) were evaluated in saliva samples using commercial kits.

RESULTS

All measured antioxidants were affected by treatment resulting in significant increase in TAOC (p < 0.005), ALB (p < 0.001), UA (p < 0.001) and GPX (p < 0.001) and decrease of SOD (p < 0.005) in response to SRP, where no differences were observed for any of parameters in the oral hygiene instructions group. Comparison of antioxidant levels between the HC and SRP group showed that before treatment ALB were significantly higher in HC when compared to the SRP group (p = 0.039), and GXP (p = 0.000) and SOD (p = 0.021) levels were significantly higher in the SRP group. Comparison of values after treatment showed that TAOC was significantly higher in the HC than in the SRP group (p = 0.001), but UA was, inversely, significantly higher in the SRP group (p = 0.034). All clinical parameters except clinical attachment level were significantly decreased after SRP and significant correlations were observed between SOD and GI (p = 0.017), SOD and PI (p = 0.011), GPX and GI (p = 0.003) and GPX and PI (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Non-surgical periodontal treatment affected salivary TAOC, ALB, UA, SOD and GPX; moreover, these biochemical parameters convincingly reflected periodontal status and tissue response on treatment.

摘要

背景与目的

牙周炎的主要病理模式之一是自由基产生与局部抗氧化剂之间失衡,导致牙周组织破坏。本研究的目的是调查非手术牙周治疗对唾液抗氧化剂的影响,并评估其作为反映牙周组织状况和治疗效果生物标志物的能力。

材料与方法

63名全身健康的非吸烟者,包括21名牙周健康受试者(HC)和42名慢性牙周炎患者符合纳入标准。一半患者接受龈上洁治和根面平整(SRP),另一半仅接受口腔卫生指导。在基线访视时以及治疗后/基线访视2个月时进行全口临床测量,包括牙龈指数(GI)、菌斑指数(PI)、牙周袋深度、临床附着水平和唾液采样。使用商用试剂盒评估唾液样本中的总抗氧化能力(TAOC)、白蛋白(ALB)、尿酸(UA)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(GPX)。

结果

所有测量的抗氧化剂均受治疗影响,SRP治疗后TAOC(p < 0.005)、ALB(p < 0.001)、UA(p < 0.001)和GPX(p < 0.001)显著增加,SOD(p < 0.005)降低,口腔卫生指导组的任何参数均未观察到差异。HC组和SRP组之间抗氧化剂水平的比较表明,治疗前HC组的ALB显著高于SRP组(p = 0.039),SRP组的GXP(p = 0.000)和SOD(p = 0.021)水平显著更高。治疗后值的比较表明,HC组的TAOC显著高于SRP组(p = 0.001),但相反,SRP组的UA显著更高(p = 0.034)。SRP治疗后除临床附着水平外的所有临床参数均显著降低,并且在SOD与GI(p = 0.017)、SOD与PI(p = 0.011)、GPX与GI(p = 0.003)以及GPX与PI(p = 0.008)之间观察到显著相关性。

结论

非手术牙周治疗影响唾液TAOC、ALB、UA、SOD和GPX;此外,这些生化参数令人信服地反映了牙周状况和组织对治疗的反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验