Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, P. O. Box 310, 6500 AH, Nijmegen, the Netherlands,
Mem Cognit. 2013 Nov;41(8):1200-11. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0332-7.
The present study examined the relation between nonselective inhibition and selective inhibition in picture naming performance. Nonselective inhibition refers to the ability to suppress any unwanted response, whereas selective inhibition refers to the ability to suppress specific competing responses. The degree of competition in picture naming was manipulated by presenting targets along with distractor words that could be semantically related (e.g., a picture of a dog combined with the word cat) or unrelated (tree) to the picture name. The mean naming response time (RT) was longer in the related than in the unrelated condition, reflecting semantic interference. Delta plot analyses showed that participants with small mean semantic interference effects employed selective inhibition more effectively than did participants with larger semantic interference effects. The participants were also tested on the stop-signal task, which taps nonselective inhibition. Their performance on this task was correlated with their mean naming RT but, importantly, not with the selective inhibition indexed by the delta plot analyses and the magnitude of the semantic interference effect. These results indicate that nonselective inhibition ability and selective inhibition of competitors in picture naming are separable to some extent.
本研究考察了图片命名表现中非选择性抑制和选择性抑制之间的关系。非选择性抑制是指抑制任何不想要的反应的能力,而选择性抑制是指抑制特定竞争反应的能力。通过呈现与目标相关或不相关的干扰词(例如,狗的图片与猫的单词组合)来操纵图片命名中的竞争程度。与不相关的条件相比,相关条件下的平均命名反应时间(RT)更长,反映了语义干扰。Delta 图分析表明,与语义干扰效应较大的参与者相比,语义干扰效应较小的参与者更有效地使用了选择性抑制。参与者还接受了停止信号任务的测试,该任务涉及非选择性抑制。他们在该任务上的表现与他们的平均命名 RT 相关,但重要的是,与 delta 图分析索引的选择性抑制和语义干扰效应的大小无关。这些结果表明,在某种程度上,非选择性抑制能力和图片命名中竞争的选择性抑制是可分离的。