Schoch-Spana Monica, Sell Tara Kirk, Morhard Ryan
UPMC Center for Health Security, Baltimore, Maryland 21202, USA.
Biosecur Bioterror. 2013 Jun;11(2):118-29. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2013.0027. Epub 2013 May 29.
Over the past decade, community engagement has become a central tenet of US federal doctrine on public health emergency preparedness. Little is known, however, about how the vision of a ready, aware, and involved populace has translated into local practice, or which conditions thus far have advanced community involvement in what is typically considered the province of government authorities and emergency professionals. In 2011-12, to help close that knowledge gap, investigators carried out semistructured qualitative interviews with practitioners (N=25) from 7 local health departments about which conditions have advanced or inhibited community engagement in public health emergency preparedness. Among the organizational factors identified as enabling local health departments' involvement of community residents and groups in emergency preparedness were a supportive agency leadership and culture, sufficient staffing and programmatic funding, interested and willing partners, and external triggers such as federal grants and disaster experiences that spotlighted the importance of community relationships to effective response. Facing budget and staff cuts, local health departments feel increasingly constrained in efforts to build trusted and lasting preparedness ties with community partners. At the same time, some progress in preparedness partnerships may be possible in the context of agency leadership, culture, and climate that affirms the value of collaboration with the community.
在过去十年中,社区参与已成为美国联邦公共卫生应急准备学说的核心原则。然而,对于如何将民众做好准备、保持警觉并积极参与的愿景转化为地方实践,或者到目前为止哪些条件推动了社区参与通常被视为政府当局和应急专业人员职责范围的事务,我们知之甚少。在2011年至2012年期间,为了填补这一知识空白,研究人员对来自7个地方卫生部门的25名从业者进行了半结构化定性访谈,了解哪些条件促进或阻碍了社区参与公共卫生应急准备工作。在被确定为有助于地方卫生部门让社区居民和团体参与应急准备工作的组织因素中,有支持性的机构领导和文化、充足的人员配备和项目资金、感兴趣且愿意合作的伙伴,以及诸如联邦拨款和灾难经历等外部诱因,这些都凸显了社区关系对有效应对的重要性。面对预算削减和人员裁减,地方卫生部门在与社区伙伴建立信任和持久的应急准备关系方面感到越来越受限。与此同时,在肯定与社区合作价值的机构领导、文化和氛围背景下,应急准备伙伴关系有可能取得一些进展。