• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Searching for new community engagement approaches in the Netherlands: a realist qualitative study.在荷兰寻找新的社区参与方法:一项现实主义定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 16;20(1):508. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08616-6.
2
Tracking the Development of Community Engagement Over Time: Realist Qualitative Study.追踪社区参与随时间的发展:实证定性研究
J Particip Med. 2024 May 15;16:e47500. doi: 10.2196/47500.
3
Achieving successful community engagement: a rapid realist review.实现成功的社区参与:一项快速现实主义综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 13;18(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3090-1.
4
'They need to ask me first'. Community engagement with low-income citizens. A realist qualitative case-study.“他们需要先问过我”。社区与低收入公民的互动。一个现实主义的定性案例研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Apr;25(2):684-696. doi: 10.1111/hex.13415. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
5
Engaging citizens in local health policymaking. A realist explorative case-study.让公民参与地方卫生决策。一个现实主义的探索性案例研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0265404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265404. eCollection 2022.
6
Experiences of community members and researchers on community engagement in an Ecohealth project in South Africa and Zimbabwe.南非和津巴布韦社区成员及研究人员在一个生态健康项目中的社区参与经历。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Dec 13;18(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0236-3.
7
Managing community engagement in research in Uganda: insights from practices in HIV/AIDS research.管理乌干达的社区参与研究:来自艾滋病研究实践的见解。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Jun 14;23(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00797-6.
8
Japan as the front-runner of super-aged societies: Perspectives from medicine and medical care in Japan.日本作为超老龄化社会的领跑者:来自日本医学与医疗护理的视角
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Jun;15(6):673-87. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12450. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
9
Citizen engagement in healthcare procurement decision-making by healthcare insurers: recent experiences in the Netherlands.医疗保险公司参与医疗保健采购决策:荷兰的最新经验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Dec 22;20(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00939-7.
10
Citizens' initiatives for care and welfare in the Netherlands: an ecological analysis.荷兰的公民关怀与福利倡议:一项生态分析。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):1334. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7599-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards an integrative approach of healthcare: implementing positive health in three cases in the Netherlands.迈向医疗保健的综合方法:在荷兰的三个案例中实施积极健康。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 2;24(1):882. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11247-x.
2
Evaluation of Community Involvement and Development in an Orthopedic Hospital.一家骨科医院的社区参与和发展评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jun 27;12(13):1286. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12131286.
3
Tracking the Development of Community Engagement Over Time: Realist Qualitative Study.追踪社区参与随时间的发展:实证定性研究
J Particip Med. 2024 May 15;16:e47500. doi: 10.2196/47500.
4
Enhanced or hindered research benefits? A realist review of community engagement and participatory research practices for non-communicable disease prevention in low- and middle-income countries.促进还是阻碍研究效益?对中低收入国家非传染性疾病预防的社区参与和参与式研究实践的现实主义评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Feb 10;9(2):e013712. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013712.
5
Changing a Community: A Holistic View of the Fundamental Human Needs and Their Public Health Impacts.改变一个社区:对人类基本需求及其公共卫生影响的整体看法。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 24;15(8):e44023. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44023. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Conceptualizing learning health systems: A mapping review.学习型健康系统的概念化:一项映射综述。
Learn Health Syst. 2022 Jun 2;7(1):e10311. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10311. eCollection 2023 Jan.
7
Citizen engagement in healthcare procurement decision-making by healthcare insurers: recent experiences in the Netherlands.医疗保险公司参与医疗保健采购决策:荷兰的最新经验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Dec 22;20(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00939-7.
8
Engaging citizens in local health policymaking. A realist explorative case-study.让公民参与地方卫生决策。一个现实主义的探索性案例研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0265404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265404. eCollection 2022.
9
'They need to ask me first'. Community engagement with low-income citizens. A realist qualitative case-study.“他们需要先问过我”。社区与低收入公民的互动。一个现实主义的定性案例研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Apr;25(2):684-696. doi: 10.1111/hex.13415. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
10
Confident futures: Community-based organizations as first responders and agents of change in the face of the Covid-19 pandemic.充满信心的未来:社区组织在新冠疫情大流行面前作为第一响应者和变革推动者。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Feb;294:114639. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114639. Epub 2021 Dec 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Achieving successful community engagement: a rapid realist review.实现成功的社区参与:一项快速现实主义综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 13;18(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3090-1.
2
Heard and valued: the development of a model to meaningfully engage marginalized populations in health services planning.被倾听与重视:构建一个让边缘化人群切实参与健康服务规划的模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 15;18(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2969-1.
3
Empowering citizens or mining resources? The contested domain of citizen engagement in professional care services.赋权公民还是挖掘资源?专业护理服务中公民参与的有争议领域。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Apr;203:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
4
Improving healthcare for Aboriginal Australians through effective engagement between community and health services.通过社区与卫生服务机构之间的有效互动,改善澳大利亚原住民的医疗保健状况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 7;16:224. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1497-0.
5
RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations.拉美西斯二世现实主义评价报告标准。
BMC Med. 2016 Jun 24;14(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0643-1.
6
From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement.从象征主义到赋权:推动患者及公众参与医疗保健改善
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Aug;25(8):626-32. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004839. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
7
A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding Community Participation in Community Health Needs Assessments.一种理解社区参与社区卫生需求评估的混合方法。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2017 Mar/Apr;23(2):112-121. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000362.
8
The concept of mechanism from a realist approach: a scoping review to facilitate its operationalization in public health program evaluation.基于现实主义方法的机制概念:一项范围综述,以促进其在公共卫生项目评估中的应用。
Implement Sci. 2015 Oct 30;10:153. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0345-7.
9
The value of frameworks as knowledge translation mechanisms to guide community participation practice in Ontario CHCs.框架作为知识转化机制在安大略省社区保健中心指导社区参与实践中的价值。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Oct;142:223-31. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.024. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
10
A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects.基于社区参与式研究的现实主义评价:伙伴关系协同效应、信任建立及相关连锁反应。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 30;15:725. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1.

在荷兰寻找新的社区参与方法:一项现实主义定性研究。

Searching for new community engagement approaches in the Netherlands: a realist qualitative study.

机构信息

National Institute for Health and the Environment (RIVM), P.O. Box 1, 3720, BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Tilburg University, Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, PO Box 90153, 5000, LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 16;20(1):508. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08616-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-020-08616-6
PMID:32299398
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7164336/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Community engagement is increasingly seen as key to improving healthcare systems and to increasing communities' involvement in the shaping of their own communities. This paper describes how 'community engagement' (CE) is understood and being operationalised in the Dutch healthcare system by investigating the CE approaches being implemented in six different regions and by examining engaged citizens' and professionals' experiences of those CE approaches.

METHODS

For this realist study, interviews and focus groups were held with citizens (16) and professionals (42) involved in CE approaches in the six regions. Additionally, CE-related activities were observed to supplement interview data.

RESULTS

This study shows that citizens and professionals defined and experienced CE differently and that they differed in who they felt had ownership of CE. The CE approaches implemented in community-led initiatives and organisationally-led initiatives varied accordingly. Furthermore, both citizens and professionals were searching for meaningful ways for citizens to have more control over healthcare in their own communities.

CONCLUSION

CE can be improved by, first of all, developing a shared and overarching vision of what CE should look like, establishing clear roles and remits for organisations and communities, and taking active measures to ensure CE is more inclusive and representative of harder-to-reach groups. At the same time, to help ensure such shared visions do not further entrench power imbalances between citizens and professionals, professionals require training in successful CE approaches.

摘要

背景

社区参与越来越被视为改善医疗体系和增加社区参与塑造自身社区的关键。本文通过调查在六个不同地区实施的社区参与方法,并研究参与的公民和专业人员对这些社区参与方法的体验,描述了荷兰医疗体系中“社区参与”(CE)的理解和运作方式。

方法

为了进行这项现实主义研究,对六个地区参与社区参与方法的公民(16 人)和专业人员(42 人)进行了访谈和焦点小组讨论。此外,还观察了与 CE 相关的活动,以补充访谈数据。

结果

本研究表明,公民和专业人员对 CE 的定义和体验不同,他们对谁拥有 CE 的所有权也存在差异。在社区主导的倡议和组织主导的倡议中实施的社区参与方法也相应有所不同。此外,公民和专业人员都在寻找让公民更能控制自己社区医疗的有意义的方法。

结论

可以通过首先制定一个关于 CE 应该是什么样子的共同和总体愿景,为组织和社区建立明确的角色和职权范围,并采取积极措施确保 CE 更具包容性和代表性,来改进 CE,以涵盖更难接触到的群体。同时,为了帮助确保这种共同愿景不会进一步加剧公民和专业人员之间的权力失衡,专业人员需要接受成功的 CE 方法培训。