Rana Sarosh, Schnettler William T, Powe Camille, Wenger Julia, Salahuddin Saira, Cerdeira Ana Sofia, Verlohren Stefan, Perschel Frank H, Arany Zoltan, Lim Kee-Hak, Thadhani Ravi, Karumanchi S Ananth
Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Hypertens Pregnancy. 2013 May;32(2):189-201. doi: 10.3109/10641955.2013.784788.
To compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of preeclamptic women presenting with a normal plasma angiogenic profile with those subjects who are characterized by an abnormal angiogenic profile.
This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study in women presenting to obstetrical triage at <37 weeks of gestation and diagnosed with preeclampsia within 2 weeks of enrollment and in whom angiogenic factors (sFlt1 and PlGF) measurements were available. Patients were divided into two groups based on their circulating levels of these factors described as a ratio; the sFlt1/PlGF ratio, non-angiogenic preeclampsia (sFlt1/PlGF ratio <85) and angiogenic preeclampsia (sFlt1/PlGF ratio ≥85). The data are presented by sFlt1/PlGF category using median and quartile 1-quartile 3 for continuous variables and by frequency and sample sizes for categorical variables.
In our cohort, the patients with non-angiogenic preeclampsia (N = 46) were more obese [BMI: 35.2 (31.6, 38.7) versus 31.1 (28.0, 39.0), p = 0.04], more likely to have preexisting diabetes (21.7% versus 2.0%, p = 0.002) and presented at a later gestational age [35 (32, 37) versus 32 (29, 34) weeks, p < 0.0001] as compared with women with angiogenic preeclampsia (N = 51). Women with non-angiogenic preeclampsia had no serious adverse outcomes (elevated liver function tests/low platelets: 0% versus 23.5%, abruption: 0% versus 9.8%, pulmonary edema: 0% versus 3.9%, eclampsia: 0% versus 2.0 %, small for gestational age: 0% versus 17.7% and fetal/neonatal death: 0% versus 5.9%) as compared with women with angiogenic preeclampsia. The rate of preterm delivery <34 weeks was 8.7% in non-angiogenic preeclampsia compared with 64.7% in angiogenic preeclampsia (p < 0.0001). Interestingly, delivery between 34 and 37 weeks and resource utilization (hospital admission days) were similar in the two groups.
In contrast to the angiogenic form, the non-angiogenic form of preeclampsia is characterized by little to no risk of preeclampsia-related adverse outcomes, other than iatrogenic prematurity. Incorporation of angiogenic biomarkers in the evaluation of preeclampsia may allow accurate and early identification of severe disease.
比较血浆血管生成谱正常的子痫前期妇女与血管生成谱异常的子痫前期妇女的临床特征和结局。
这是一项前瞻性队列研究的二次分析,研究对象为妊娠<37周就诊于产科分诊且在入组后2周内诊断为子痫前期且可进行血管生成因子(可溶性血管内皮生长因子受体1[sFlt1]和胎盘生长因子[PlGF])测量的妇女。根据这些因子的循环水平(以sFlt1/PlGF比值表示)将患者分为两组;非血管生成性子痫前期(sFlt1/PlGF比值<85)和血管生成性子痫前期(sFlt1/PlGF比值≥85)。连续变量的数据按sFlt1/PlGF类别以中位数和四分位数1-四分位数3呈现,分类变量的数据按频率和样本量呈现。
在我们的队列中,与血管生成性子痫前期妇女(N = 51)相比,非血管生成性子痫前期患者(N = 46)更肥胖[体重指数:35.2(31.6,38.7)对31.1(28.0,39.0),p = 0.04],更易患孕前糖尿病(21.7%对2.0%,p = 0.002),且就诊时孕周更大[35(32,37)对32(29,34)周,p < 0.0001]。与血管生成性子痫前期妇女相比,非血管生成性子痫前期妇女无严重不良结局(肝功能检查升高/血小板减少:0%对23.