• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于临床病理和基因组标记物的口腔癌预后:使用特征选择和机器学习方法的混合方法。

Oral cancer prognosis based on clinicopathologic and genomic markers using a hybrid of feature selection and machine learning methods.

机构信息

Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Institute of Biological Science, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

BMC Bioinformatics. 2013 May 31;14:170. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-170.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2105-14-170
PMID:23725313
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3673908/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Machine learning techniques are becoming useful as an alternative approach to conventional medical diagnosis or prognosis as they are good for handling noisy and incomplete data, and significant results can be attained despite a small sample size. Traditionally, clinicians make prognostic decisions based on clinicopathologic markers. However, it is not easy for the most skilful clinician to come out with an accurate prognosis by using these markers alone. Thus, there is a need to use genomic markers to improve the accuracy of prognosis. The main aim of this research is to apply a hybrid of feature selection and machine learning methods in oral cancer prognosis based on the parameters of the correlation of clinicopathologic and genomic markers.

RESULTS

In the first stage of this research, five feature selection methods have been proposed and experimented on the oral cancer prognosis dataset. In the second stage, the model with the features selected from each feature selection methods are tested on the proposed classifiers. Four types of classifiers are chosen; these are namely, ANFIS, artificial neural network, support vector machine and logistic regression. A k-fold cross-validation is implemented on all types of classifiers due to the small sample size. The hybrid model of ReliefF-GA-ANFIS with 3-input features of drink, invasion and p63 achieved the best accuracy (accuracy = 93.81%; AUC = 0.90) for the oral cancer prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The results revealed that the prognosis is superior with the presence of both clinicopathologic and genomic markers. The selected features can be investigated further to validate the potential of becoming as significant prognostic signature in the oral cancer studies.

摘要

背景

机器学习技术作为传统医学诊断或预后的替代方法变得越来越有用,因为它们擅长处理嘈杂和不完整的数据,并且即使样本量很小也能取得显著的结果。传统上,临床医生根据临床病理标志物做出预后决策。然而,即使是最熟练的临床医生,仅使用这些标志物也不容易做出准确的预后。因此,需要使用基因组标志物来提高预后的准确性。本研究的主要目的是应用特征选择和机器学习方法的混合方法,基于临床病理和基因组标志物的相关性参数,对口腔癌预后进行分析。

结果

在本研究的第一阶段,提出了五种特征选择方法,并在口腔癌预后数据集上进行了实验。在第二阶段,使用从每种特征选择方法中选择的特征来测试所提出的分类器上的模型。选择了四种类型的分类器;这些是自适应神经模糊推理系统 (ANFIS)、人工神经网络、支持向量机和逻辑回归。由于样本量小,对所有类型的分类器都实施了 k 折交叉验证。具有 3 个输入特征(饮酒、侵袭和 p63)的 ReliefF-GA-ANFIS 混合模型在口腔癌预后中取得了最佳的准确性(准确性=93.81%;AUC=0.90)。

结论

结果表明,同时存在临床病理和基因组标志物的预后效果更好。所选特征可以进一步研究,以验证其在口腔癌研究中成为有意义的预后标志物的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52f2/3673908/de01e524007d/1471-2105-14-170-8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52f2/3673908/f1e7ddfd9066/1471-2105-14-170-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52f2/3673908/9b0fa3d65f22/1471-2105-14-170-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52f2/3673908/a0f285ce46a0/1471-2105-14-170-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52f2/3673908/b1c937cb3121/1471-2105-14-170-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52f2/3673908/3001380c32ed/1471-2105-14-170-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52f2/3673908/062ad9f11bd5/1471-2105-14-170-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52f2/3673908/12464adc9242/1471-2105-14-170-7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52f2/3673908/de01e524007d/1471-2105-14-170-8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52f2/3673908/f1e7ddfd9066/1471-2105-14-170-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52f2/3673908/9b0fa3d65f22/1471-2105-14-170-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52f2/3673908/a0f285ce46a0/1471-2105-14-170-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52f2/3673908/b1c937cb3121/1471-2105-14-170-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52f2/3673908/3001380c32ed/1471-2105-14-170-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52f2/3673908/062ad9f11bd5/1471-2105-14-170-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52f2/3673908/12464adc9242/1471-2105-14-170-7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52f2/3673908/de01e524007d/1471-2105-14-170-8.jpg

相似文献

1
Oral cancer prognosis based on clinicopathologic and genomic markers using a hybrid of feature selection and machine learning methods.基于临床病理和基因组标记物的口腔癌预后:使用特征选择和机器学习方法的混合方法。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2013 May 31;14:170. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-170.
2
Application of Artificial Intelligence for Preoperative Diagnostic and Prognostic Prediction in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Based on Blood Biomarkers.基于血液生物标志物的人工智能在卵巢上皮性癌术前诊断和预后预测中的应用。
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 May 15;25(10):3006-3015. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3378. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
3
Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma in contrast-enhanced MDCT images using quantitative feature classification.基于定量特征分类的 MDCT 增强图像鉴别乏脂性血管平滑肌脂肪瘤与透明细胞肾细胞癌
Med Phys. 2017 Jul;44(7):3604-3614. doi: 10.1002/mp.12258. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
4
Top scoring pairs for feature selection in machine learning and applications to cancer outcome prediction.机器学习中特征选择的最佳评分对及其在癌症预后预测中的应用。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Sep 23;12:375. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-375.
5
Comparison of supervised machine learning classification techniques in prediction of locoregional recurrences in early oral tongue cancer.比较早期口腔舌癌局部区域复发预测中监督机器学习分类技术。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Apr;136:104068. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104068. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
6
Diagnosis and classification of cancer using hybrid model based on ReliefF and convolutional neural network.基于ReliefF和卷积神经网络的混合模型用于癌症的诊断与分类
Med Hypotheses. 2020 Apr;137:109577. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109577. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
7
Study of morphological and textural features for classification of oral squamous cell carcinoma by traditional machine learning techniques.基于传统机器学习技术的口腔鳞状细胞癌形态和纹理特征分类研究。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2020 Dec;3(6):e1293. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1293. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
8
Application of artificial intelligence and machine learning for prediction of oral cancer risk.人工智能和机器学习在口腔癌风险预测中的应用。
J Oral Pathol Med. 2021 May;50(5):444-450. doi: 10.1111/jop.13157. Epub 2021 Jan 17.
9
Radiogenomics of lower-grade gliomas: machine learning-based MRI texture analysis for predicting 1p/19q codeletion status.低级别胶质瘤的放射基因组学:基于机器学习的 MRI 纹理分析预测 1p/19q 缺失状态。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Feb;30(2):877-886. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06492-2. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
10
Machine learning in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Current status, clinical concerns and prospects for future-A systematic review.机器学习在口腔鳞状细胞癌中的应用:现状、临床关注点及未来展望——系统综述。
Artif Intell Med. 2021 May;115:102060. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102060. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
A bibliometric analysis reveals a dynamic growth in the use of artificial intelligence in oral cancer research over three decades.一项文献计量分析揭示了三十年来人工智能在口腔癌研究中的应用呈动态增长。
Discov Oncol. 2025 Jul 28;16(1):1432. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-03293-6.
2
Comparative study of five-year cervical cancer cause-specific survival prediction models based on SEER data.基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据的五年期宫颈癌特定病因生存预测模型的比较研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22465. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04540-0.
3
Attitudes and Perceptions of Australian Dentists and Dental Students Towards Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Survey.

本文引用的文献

1
A multiscale and multiparametric approach for modeling the progression of oral cancer.一种用于口腔癌进展建模的多尺度和多参数方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Nov 22;12:136. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-136.
2
Feature selection methods for optimizing clinicopathologic input variables in oral cancer prognosis.用于优化口腔癌预后中临床病理输入变量的特征选择方法。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(10):2659-64.
3
Multiparametric decision support system for the prediction of oral cancer reoccurrence.用于预测口腔癌复发的多参数决策支持系统
澳大利亚牙医和牙科学生对人工智能在牙科领域应用的态度与认知:一项调查
Eur J Dent Educ. 2025 Feb;29(1):9-18. doi: 10.1111/eje.13042. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
4
IASLC grading system predicts distant metastases for resected lung adenocarcinoma.国际肺癌研究协会(IASLC)分级系统可预测肺切除术后肺腺癌的远处转移情况。
J Clin Pathol. 2024 Aug 21. doi: 10.1136/jcp-2024-209649.
5
Artificial Intelligence in Head and Neck Surgery.人工智能在头颈部外科中的应用。
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2024 Oct;57(5):803-820. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2024.05.001. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
6
The innovation of AI-based software in oral diseases: clinical-histopathological correlation diagnostic accuracy primary study.基于人工智能的口腔疾病软件创新:临床-组织病理学相关性诊断准确性的初步研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 22;24(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04347-x.
7
Deep-learning survival analysis for patients with calcific aortic valve disease undergoing valve replacement.深度学习分析行瓣膜置换术的钙化性主动脉瓣疾病患者的生存情况。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 13;14(1):10902. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61685-0.
8
Digital image analysis and machine learning-assisted prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in triple-negative breast cancer.基于数字图像分析和机器学习的三阴性乳腺癌新辅助化疗反应预测。
Breast Cancer Res. 2024 Jan 18;26(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13058-023-01752-y.
9
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting all-cause mortality in American adult hypertensive populations.美国成年高血压人群全因死亡率预测列线图的开发与验证
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Nov 22;14:1266870. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1266870. eCollection 2023.
10
Multi-institutional Prognostic Modeling in Head and Neck Cancer: Evaluating Impact and Generalizability of Deep Learning and Radiomics.多机构头颈部癌症预后建模:评估深度学习和放射组学的影响和泛化能力。
Cancer Res Commun. 2023 Jun 29;3(6):1140-1151. doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-22-0152. eCollection 2023 Jun.
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2012 Nov;16(6):1127-34. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2011.2165076. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
4
Applications of machine learning in cancer prediction and prognosis.机器学习在癌症预测和预后中的应用。
Cancer Inform. 2007 Feb 11;2:59-77.
5
Prognostic factors and survival analysis in a sample of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients.口腔鳞状细胞癌患者样本中的预后因素及生存分析
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Nov;106(5):685-95. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.07.002. Epub 2008 Aug 30.
6
Improved breast cancer prognosis through the combination of clinical and genetic markers.通过临床和基因标志物相结合改善乳腺癌预后。
Bioinformatics. 2007 Jan 1;23(1):30-7. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl543. Epub 2006 Nov 26.
7
Predicting the prognosis of breast cancer by integrating clinical and microarray data with Bayesian networks.通过贝叶斯网络整合临床和微阵列数据预测乳腺癌的预后。
Bioinformatics. 2006 Jul 15;22(14):e184-90. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl230.
8
Oral squamous cell carcinoma: etiology, pathogenesis and prognostic value of genomic alterations.口腔鳞状细胞癌:基因组改变的病因、发病机制及预后价值
Indian J Cancer. 2006 Apr-Jun;43(2):60-6. doi: 10.4103/0019-509x.25886.
9
The use of artificial neural networks in decision support in cancer: a systematic review.人工神经网络在癌症决策支持中的应用:一项系统综述。
Neural Netw. 2006 May;19(4):408-15. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2005.10.007. Epub 2006 Feb 14.
10
Neuro-fuzzy modeling: an accurate and interpretable method for predicting bladder cancer progression.神经模糊建模:一种预测膀胱癌进展的准确且可解释的方法。
J Urol. 2006 Feb;175(2):474-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00246-6.