Department of Psychiatry, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-shi, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Sep;25(9):1543-57. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213000689. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
We performed a meta-analysis in order to determine which neuropsychological domains and tasks would be most sensitive for discriminating between patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and healthy controls.
Relevant articles were identified through a literature search of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases for the period between January 1997 and May 2011. A meta-analysis was conducted using the standardized means of individual cognitive tests in each domain. The heterogeneity was assessed, and subgroup analyses according to age and medication status were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity.
A total of 22 trials involving 955 MDD patients and 7,664 healthy participants were selected for our meta-analysis. MDD patients showed significantly impaired results compared with healthy participants on the Digit Span and Continuous Performance Test in the attention domain; the Trail Making Test A (TMT-A) and the Digit Symbol Test in the processing speed domain; the Stroop Test, the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and Verbal Fluency in the executive function domain; and immediate verbal memory in the memory domain. The Finger Tapping Task, TMT-B, delayed verbal memory, and immediate and delayed visual memory failed to separate MDD patients from healthy controls. The results of subgroup analysis showed that performance of Verbal Fluency was significantly impaired in younger depressed patients (<60 years), and immediate visual memory was significantly reduced in depressed patients using antidepressants.
Our findings have inevitable limitations arising from methodological issues inherent in the meta-analysis and we could not explain high heterogeneity between studies. Despite such limitations, current study has the strength of being the first meta-analysis which tried to specify cognitive function of depressed patients compared with healthy participants. And our findings may provide clinicians with further evidences that some cognitive tests in specific cognitive domains have sensitivity to discriminate MDD patients from healthy controls.
我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以确定哪些神经心理学领域和任务最能区分重度抑郁症(MDD)患者和健康对照者。
通过对 1997 年 1 月至 2011 年 5 月期间 PubMed 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库的文献进行检索,确定了相关文章。使用每个领域的个体认知测试的标准化均值进行荟萃分析。评估了异质性,并根据年龄和药物治疗状态进行了亚组分析,以探讨异质性的来源。
共有 22 项试验纳入 955 例 MDD 患者和 7664 例健康参与者,用于我们的荟萃分析。与健康参与者相比,MDD 患者在注意力域的数字跨度和连续执行测试、加工速度域的 Trail Making Test A(TMT-A)和数字符号测试、执行功能域的 Stroop 测试、威斯康星卡片分类测试和言语流畅性以及记忆域的即时言语记忆方面表现出明显的损伤。手指敲击任务、TMT-B、延迟言语记忆以及即时和延迟视觉记忆无法将 MDD 患者与健康对照者区分开来。亚组分析结果表明,年龄较小的抑郁患者(<60 岁)的言语流畅性明显受损,服用抗抑郁药的抑郁患者的即时视觉记忆明显降低。
我们的研究结果存在不可避免的局限性,源于荟萃分析中固有的方法学问题,我们无法解释研究之间的高度异质性。尽管存在这些局限性,但本研究具有第一个尝试将抑郁患者的认知功能与健康参与者进行比较的荟萃分析的优势。我们的研究结果可能为临床医生提供进一步的证据,表明特定认知领域的某些认知测试具有区分 MDD 患者和健康对照者的敏感性。