• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会认知心理测量评估研究:专家调查与兰德小组的结果

The social cognition psychometric evaluation study: results of the expert survey and RAND panel.

作者信息

Pinkham Amy E, Penn David L, Green Michael F, Buck Benjamin, Healey Kristin, Harvey Philip D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX; Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX;

Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC;

出版信息

Schizophr Bull. 2014 Jul;40(4):813-23. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbt081. Epub 2013 May 31.

DOI:10.1093/schbul/sbt081
PMID:23728248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4059426/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In schizophrenia, social cognition is strongly linked to functional outcome and is increasingly seen as a viable treatment target. The goal of the Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation (SCOPE) study is to identify and improve the best existing measures of social cognition so they can be suitably applied in large-scale treatment studies. Initial phases of this project sought to (1) develop consensus on critical domains of social cognition and (2) identify the best existing measures of social cognition for use in treatment studies.

METHODS

Experts in social cognition were invited to nominate key domains of social cognition and the best measures of those domains. Nominations for measures were reduced according to set criteria, and all available psychometric information about these measures was summarized and provided to RAND panelists. Panelists rated the quality of each measure on multiple criteria, and diverging ratings were discussed at the in-person meeting to obtain consensus.

RESULTS

Expert surveys identified 4 core domains of social cognition-emotion processing, social perception, theory of mind/mental state attribution, and attributional style/bias. Using RAND panel consensus ratings, the following measures were selected for further evaluation: Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire, Bell Lysaker Emotion Recognition Task, Penn Emotion Recognition Test, Relationships Across Domains, Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, The Awareness of Social Inferences Test, Hinting Task, and Trustworthiness Task.

DISCUSSION

While it was possible to establish consensus, only a limited amount of psychometric information is currently available for the candidate measures, which underscores the need for well-validated and standardized measures in this area.

摘要

背景

在精神分裂症中,社会认知与功能结局密切相关,并且越来越被视为一个可行的治疗靶点。社会认知心理测量评估(SCOPE)研究的目标是识别并改进现有的最佳社会认知测量方法,以便它们能够适用于大规模治疗研究。该项目的初始阶段旨在:(1)就社会认知的关键领域达成共识;(2)识别用于治疗研究的现有的最佳社会认知测量方法。

方法

邀请社会认知领域的专家提名社会认知的关键领域以及这些领域的最佳测量方法。根据既定标准减少对测量方法的提名,并汇总所有关于这些测量方法的可用心理测量信息并提供给兰德公司的小组成员。小组成员根据多个标准对每个测量方法的质量进行评分,并在面对面会议上讨论有分歧的评分以达成共识。

结果

专家调查确定了社会认知的4个核心领域——情绪加工、社会感知、心理理论/心理状态归因以及归因风格/偏差。使用兰德公司小组的共识评分,选择了以下测量方法进行进一步评估:《模糊意图敌意问卷》《贝尔-莱萨克情绪识别任务》《宾夕法尼亚情绪识别测试》《跨领域关系》《眼睛解读心理测试》《社会推理意识测试》《暗示任务》和《可信度任务》。

讨论

虽然有可能达成共识,但目前候选测量方法的心理测量信息有限,这突出了该领域对经过充分验证和标准化的测量方法的需求。

相似文献

1
The social cognition psychometric evaluation study: results of the expert survey and RAND panel.社会认知心理测量评估研究:专家调查与兰德小组的结果
Schizophr Bull. 2014 Jul;40(4):813-23. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbt081. Epub 2013 May 31.
2
Brief battery of the Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation study (BB-SCOPE): Development and validation in schizophrenia spectrum disorders.《社会认知心理测量评估研究的简要成套测验(BB-SCOPE)》:在精神分裂症谱系障碍中的开发和验证。
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Jun;150:307-316. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.03.017. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
3
Revisiting the validity of measures of social cognitive bias in schizophrenia: Additional results from the Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation (SCOPE) study.重新审视精神分裂症社会认知偏差测量方法的有效性:社会认知心理测量评估(SCOPE)研究的更多结果。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2016 Nov;55(4):441-454. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12113. Epub 2016 May 11.
4
Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation: Results of the Initial Psychometric Study.社会认知心理测量评估:初始心理测量研究结果
Schizophr Bull. 2016 Mar;42(2):494-504. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv056. Epub 2015 May 4.
5
Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation: Results of the Final Validation Study.社会认知心理计量学评估:最终验证研究的结果。
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Jun 6;44(4):737-748. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx117.
6
Psychometrics of social cognitive measures for psychosis treatment research.精神病治疗研究中社会认知测量的心理计量学。
Schizophr Res. 2018 Mar;193:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
7
Hostile attributions in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia contribute to poor social functioning.双相情感障碍和精神分裂症中的敌意归因会导致社会功能不良。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015 Jun;131(6):472-82. doi: 10.1111/acps.12399. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
8
Evaluation of social cognitive measures in an Asian schizophrenia sample.亚洲精神分裂症样本中社会认知测量的评估。
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2019 Dec 10;20:100169. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2019.100169. eCollection 2020 Jun.
9
The evaluation study for social cognition measures in Japan: Psychometric properties, relationships with social function, and recommendations.日本社会认知测量评估研究:心理测量特性、与社会功能的关系及建议。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2024 May;95:104003. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104003. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
10
New instrument for measuring multiple domains of social cognition: construct validity of the Social Cognition Screening Questionnaire (Japanese version).用于测量多个社会认知领域的新工具:社会认知筛查问卷(日语版)的结构效度。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2014 Sep;68(9):701-11. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12181. Epub 2014 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Socio-cognitive processes in mild-moderate depression.轻中度抑郁症中的社会认知过程。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 4;16:1541725. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1541725. eCollection 2025.
2
Psychometric properties of the Social knowledge test (SKT) and the Combined stories test (COST) in people with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder.精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的社会知识测试(SKT)和综合故事测试(COST)的心理测量特性。
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2025 Jun 21;42:100373. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100373. eCollection 2025 Dec.
3
Social perception in parents with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder and their adolescent offspring - The Danish High Risk and Resilience Study.精神分裂症或双相情感障碍患者父母及其青少年后代的社会认知——丹麦高危与复原力研究
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2025 May 26;41:100370. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100370. eCollection 2025 Sep.
4
Neuromodulation in the treatment of social cognition dysfunction in Schizophrenia: a systematic review.神经调节治疗精神分裂症社会认知功能障碍:一项系统综述。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2025 Jun 11;11(1):87. doi: 10.1038/s41537-025-00629-7.
5
Impairment in social cognition in people with substance use disorders.物质使用障碍患者的社会认知受损。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 May 27;16:1574483. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1574483. eCollection 2025.
6
Enhancing social cognition in psychosis - the potential role of open dialogue.增强精神病患者的社会认知——开放对话的潜在作用。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2025 Jun 5;11(1):84. doi: 10.1038/s41537-025-00608-y.
7
Cognitive symptoms in schizophrenia: an analysis of awareness, assessment, and management practices among psychiatrists and primary care physicians.精神分裂症的认知症状:精神科医生和初级保健医生对认知症状的认识、评估及管理实践分析
Front Psychiatry. 2025 May 8;16:1567410. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1567410. eCollection 2025.
8
Providing a taxonomy for social cognition: how to bridge the gap between expert opinion, empirical data, and theoretical models.为社会认知提供一种分类法:如何弥合专家意见、实证数据和理论模型之间的差距。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2025 May 8;50(3):E157-E161. doi: 10.1503/jpn.240156. Print 2025 May-Jun.
9
How psychological and descriptive narratives modulate the perception of facial emotional expressions: an event-related potentials (ERPs) study.心理叙事与描述性叙事如何调节对面部情绪表情的感知:一项事件相关电位(ERP)研究
Exp Brain Res. 2025 Apr 30;243(6):133. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07087-8.
10
Linking Symptom Inventories Using Semantic Textual Similarity.使用语义文本相似度链接症状清单
J Neurotrauma. 2025 Jun;42(11-12):1008-1020. doi: 10.1089/neu.2024.0301. Epub 2025 Apr 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving social cognition in schizophrenia: a pilot intervention combining computerized social cognition training with cognitive remediation.改善精神分裂症患者的社会认知:一项结合计算机化社会认知训练和认知矫正的先导性干预研究。
Schizophr Bull. 2013 May;39(3):507-17. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbs120. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
2
Putting together phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspectives on empathy.综合进化和个体发生的角度看同理心。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Jan;2(1):1-24. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 May 23.
3
Factor structure of emotional intelligence in schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者情绪智力的因子结构。
Schizophr Res. 2012 Aug;139(1-3):78-81. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.04.013. Epub 2012 May 12.
4
Training of affect recognition (TAR) in schizophrenia--impact on functional outcome.精神分裂症的情感识别训练(TAR)——对功能结局的影响。
Schizophr Res. 2012 Jul;138(2-3):262-7. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
5
Impact of family involvement on social cognition training in clinically stable outpatients with schizophrenia -- a randomized pilot study.家庭参与对精神分裂症临床稳定门诊患者社会认知训练的影响——一项随机试点研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2012 Jan 30;195(1-2):32-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.07.031. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
6
Social cognitive training for schizophrenia: a meta-analytic investigation of controlled research.精神分裂症的社会认知训练:对照研究的荟萃分析。
Schizophr Bull. 2012 Sep;38(5):1092-104. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr036. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
7
Social cognition in psychosis: multidimensional structure, clinical correlates, and relationship with functional outcome.精神病学中的社会认知:多维结构、临床相关性以及与功能结局的关系。
Schizophr Res. 2011 Feb;125(2-3):143-51. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.11.007. Epub 2010 Nov 26.
8
The neural bases for empathy.同理心的神经基础。
Neuroscientist. 2011 Feb;17(1):18-24. doi: 10.1177/1073858410379268. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
9
Could schizophrenic subjects improve their social cognition abilities only with observation and imitation of social situations?精神分裂症患者仅通过观察和模仿社会情境,能否提高他们的社会认知能力?
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010 Oct;20(5):675-703. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2010.486284. Epub 2010 Aug 1.
10
The relationship between neurocognition and social cognition with functional outcomes in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis.精神分裂症患者的神经认知与社会认知功能与功能结局的关系:一项荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Jan;35(3):573-88. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Jul 8.