Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, 101 Deahakro, Chongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, South Korea.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2013 Oct;13(5):343-51. doi: 10.1007/s40256-013-0031-6.
Although the efficacy of ezetimibe/simvastatin and atorvastatin on traditional lipid parameters has been studied extensively, the apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A1 (ApoB/ApoA1) ratio, which has a better predictive value for cardiovascular events, has not previously been used as a primary endpoint in these two treatment groups.
Our objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg versus atorvastatin 20 mg once daily in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
This study was an open-label, randomized, controlled study. Type 2 diabetes patients with high levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (>100 mg/dL) were randomized to receive ezetimibe/simvastatin or atorvastatin.
The primary endpoint was the difference in the percent change of ApoB/ApoA1 at 12 weeks, and secondary endpoints were changes in lipid profiles, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) index, and C-reactive protein.
In total, 132 patients (66 for each group) were enrolled and randomized. After 12 weeks of treatment, the ApoB/ApoA1 ratio was significantly reduced in both groups; however, the difference of changes between the two groups was not statistically significant (ezetimibe/simvastatin -38.6 ± 18.0 % vs. atorvastatin -34.4 ± 15.5 %; p = 0.059). There were no significant differences in changes to total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, ApoB, and ApoB48 between the two groups. However, the increments of ApoA1 were significantly greater in the ezetimibe/simvastatin group than in the atorvastatin group (2.8 ± 10.0 vs. -1.8 ± 9.8 %; p = 0.002). In the per-protocol analysis, improvement in ApoB/ApoA1 was significantly greater in the ezetimibe/simvastatin group (-42.8 ± 11.8 vs. -36.7 ± 13.2 %; p = 0.019). The changes in HbA1c, HOMA index, and C-reactive protein were comparable between the two groups. The adverse reaction rate was similar between the two groups (24.2 vs. 34.9 %; p = 0.180).
Ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg is comparable to atorvastatin 20 mg for the management of dyslipidemia, and may have more favorable effects on apolipoprotein profiles than atorvastatin 20 mg in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
尽管依折麦布/辛伐他汀和阿托伐他汀在传统血脂参数方面的疗效已得到广泛研究,但载脂蛋白 B/载脂蛋白 A1(ApoB/ApoA1)比值对心血管事件具有更好的预测价值,以前并未将其作为这两种治疗组的主要终点。
我们的目的是比较依折麦布/辛伐他汀 10/20mg 与阿托伐他汀 20mg 每日一次在韩国 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性。
这是一项开放标签、随机、对照研究。低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇水平较高(>100mg/dL)的 2 型糖尿病患者被随机分配接受依折麦布/辛伐他汀或阿托伐他汀治疗。
主要终点为 12 周时 ApoB/ApoA1 的百分比变化差异,次要终点为血脂谱、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、稳态模型评估(HOMA)指数和 C 反应蛋白的变化。
共纳入 132 例患者(每组 66 例)并进行随机分组。治疗 12 周后,两组的 ApoB/ApoA1 比值均显著降低;然而,两组间变化的差异无统计学意义(依折麦布/辛伐他汀-38.6±18.0%vs.阿托伐他汀-34.4±15.5%;p=0.059)。两组间总胆固醇、LDL 胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、甘油三酯、载脂蛋白 B 和载脂蛋白 B48 的变化无显著差异。然而,依折麦布/辛伐他汀组的载脂蛋白 A1 升高幅度明显大于阿托伐他汀组(2.8±10.0%vs.-1.8±9.8%;p=0.002)。在符合方案分析中,依折麦布/辛伐他汀组 ApoB/ApoA1 的改善明显大于阿托伐他汀组(-42.8±11.8%vs.-36.7±13.2%;p=0.019)。两组间 HbA1c、HOMA 指数和 C 反应蛋白的变化无显著差异。两组间不良反应发生率相似(24.2%vs.34.9%;p=0.180)。
依折麦布/辛伐他汀 10/20mg 与阿托伐他汀 20mg 相比,在治疗血脂异常方面相当,并且在韩国 2 型糖尿病患者中,与阿托伐他汀 20mg 相比,可能对载脂蛋白谱具有更有利的影响。