Health and Use of Time (HUT) Group, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Sports Med. 2013 Sep;43(9):893-907. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0062-9.
Overweight and obese children and adolescents face many physical and psychosocial hardships. Resistance training is a modality of exercise which allows this at-risk group to excel and therefore has the potential to positively affect not only their physical but also psychosocial health.
To systematically review and meta-analyse the peer-reviewed literature to determine the effect of resistance training on the strength, body composition and psychosocial status of overweight and/or obese children and/or adolescents.
Relevant databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane library, ProQuest) were searched up to and including 30 January 2013.
Included studies (n = 40, from the 2,247 identified) were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised controlled trials (NRCTs) and uncontrolled trials (UCTs) which had run an exercise intervention, with a resistance training component, for overweight and/or obese children and/or adolescents, and which had examined the effect of resistance training on either strength, body composition or psychosocial outcomes.
Studies were initially critically appraised for risk of bias by the lead author, following which both co-authors critically appraised five randomly selected studies to assess reliability.
Randomised controlled trials and NRCTs were analysed separately from UCTs. To determine the overall intervention effect for each outcome variable for each study design group, standardised mean differences were calculated with each individual study/data set weighted by the inverse of the pooled variance. The overall intervention effect reported for RCTs and NRCTs was relative to the control group whereas the effect reported for UCTs shows an overall post-intervention effect. Subgroup analyses, which determined whether the overall intervention effect was influenced by intervention type, training volume, age, sex, risk of bias or study design (for RCT/NRCT group only), were run using the same summary measure. Typically, resistance training had very small to small effects on body composition and moderate to large effects on strength in favour of the intervention. However, the magnitude and direction of the effect of resistance training on psychological outcomes are still unclear given the limited number of studies which looked at psychosocial outcomes and the inconclusive results shown by this review. Uncontrolled trials typically showed larger intervention effects than RCTs and NRCTs; however, these results may be greatly influenced by maturational changes rather than the intervention itself.
The included studies employed a number of different exercise intervention types (e.g. resistance training, resistance plus aerobic training etc.) that ranged from 6 to 52 weeks in duration. Studies also employed a number of different methodologies to assess similar outcome measures (e.g. dual energy X-ray absorptiometry versus skinfolds to assess body composition; one-repetition maximum testing versus hand grip strength to assess strength). However, by completing subgroup analyses and using a standardised summary measure these limitations have been accounted for.
While the effect of resistance training on the body composition and strength of overweight and obese children and adolescents is clear, given the paucity of conclusive data more studies are needed to fully understand the effect of resistance training on the psychosocial status of this population.
超重和肥胖的儿童和青少年面临着许多身体和心理社会方面的困难。阻力训练是一种运动方式,使这个高危人群能够表现出色,因此有可能不仅对他们的身体,而且对他们的心理社会健康产生积极影响。
系统地回顾和荟萃分析同行评议文献,以确定阻力训练对超重和/或肥胖儿童和/青少年的力量、身体成分和心理社会状况的影响。
截至 2013 年 1 月 30 日,检索了相关数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、SPORTDiscus、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Cochrane 图书馆、ProQuest)。
纳入的研究(n=40,从 2247 项中确定)为随机对照试验(RCT)、非随机对照试验(NRCT)和未对照试验(UCT),这些试验均进行了针对超重和/或肥胖儿童和/青少年的运动干预,其中包含阻力训练成分,并检查了阻力训练对力量、身体成分或心理社会结果的影响。
研究由主要作者进行初始风险偏倚评估,然后两位合著者对随机选择的五项研究进行了批判性评估,以评估可靠性。
随机对照试验和 NRCT 分别与 UCT 进行了分析。为了确定每个研究设计组每个结果变量的整体干预效果,使用每个单独的研究/数据集的倒数作为每个个体研究/数据集的权重,计算了标准化均数差异。报告的 RCT 和 NRCT 的整体干预效果是相对于对照组的,而 UCT 报告的效果则显示了整体干预后的效果。使用相同的汇总测量值进行了亚组分析,以确定干预类型、训练量、年龄、性别、偏倚风险或研究设计(仅用于 RCT/NRCT 组)是否会影响整体干预效果。阻力训练通常对身体成分有较小到中等的影响,对力量有较大的影响,对干预有利。然而,鉴于研究心理社会结果的研究数量有限,以及该综述显示的结果不一致,阻力训练对心理结果的影响的幅度和方向仍不清楚。未对照试验通常显示出比 RCT 和 NRCT 更大的干预效果;然而,这些结果可能受到成熟变化的极大影响,而不是干预本身。
纳入的研究采用了许多不同的运动干预类型(例如阻力训练、阻力加有氧运动等),持续时间从 6 周到 52 周不等。研究还采用了许多不同的方法来评估相似的结果测量(例如,双能 X 射线吸收法与皮褶厚度评估身体成分;一次重复最大测试与握力测试评估力量)。然而,通过完成亚组分析和使用标准化汇总测量值,这些局限性已经得到了考虑。
虽然阻力训练对超重和肥胖儿童和青少年的身体成分和力量的影响是明确的,但鉴于缺乏确凿的数据,需要更多的研究来全面了解阻力训练对这一人群心理社会状况的影响。