Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Plant Biotechnol J. 2013 Aug;11(6):649-58. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12084. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
The advances of modern plant technologies, especially genetically modified crops, are considered to be a substantial benefit to agriculture and society. However, so-called transgene escape remains and is of environmental and regulatory concern. Genetic use restriction technologies (GURTs) provide a possible solution to prevent transgene dispersal. Although GURTs were originally developed as a way for intellectual property protection (IPP), we believe their maximum benefit could be in the prevention of gene flow, that is, bioconfinement. This review describes the underlying signal transduction and components necessary to implement any GURT system. Furthermore, we review the similarities and differences between IPP- and bioconfinement-oriented GURTs, discuss the GURTs' design for impeding transgene escape and summarize recent advances. Lastly, we go beyond the state of the science to speculate on regulatory and ecological effects of implementing GURTs for bioconfinement.
现代植物技术的进步,尤其是转基因作物,被认为对农业和社会有重大的益处。然而,所谓的转基因逃逸仍然存在,是环境和监管方面的关注焦点。遗传使用限制技术(GURTs)为防止转基因扩散提供了一种可能的解决方案。尽管 GURTs 最初是作为知识产权保护(IPP)的一种手段而开发的,但我们认为它们的最大好处可能在于防止基因流动,即生物隔离。本文描述了实施任何 GURT 系统所需的基本信号转导和组成部分。此外,我们还比较了以知识产权保护和生物隔离为导向的 GURTs 的异同,讨论了阻碍转基因逃逸的 GURTs 设计,并总结了最新进展。最后,我们超越了科学现状,推测了为生物隔离实施 GURTs 的监管和生态影响。