Suppr超能文献

脑电刺激的伦理:在医学研究和临床护理中使用脑刺激的原则性问题和观点的定义。

Ethics of the electrified mind: defining issues and perspectives on the principled use of brain stimulation in medical research and clinical care.

机构信息

National Core for Neuroethics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Brain Topogr. 2014 Jan;27(1):33-45. doi: 10.1007/s10548-013-0296-8. Epub 2013 Jun 4.

Abstract

In recent years, non-pharmacologic approaches to modifying human neural activity have gained increasing attention. One of these approaches is brain stimulation, which involves either the direct application of electrical current to structures in the nervous system or the indirect application of current by means of electromagnetic induction. Interventions that manipulate the brain have generally been regarded as having both the potential to alleviate devastating brain-related conditions and the capacity to create unforeseen and unwanted consequences. Hence, although brain stimulation techniques offer considerable benefits to society, they also raise a number of ethical concerns. In this paper we will address various dilemmas related to brain stimulation in the context of clinical practice and biomedical research. We will survey current work involving deep brain stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation. We will reflect upon relevant similarities and differences between them, and consider some potentially problematic issues that may arise within the framework of established principles of medical ethics: nonmaleficence and beneficence, autonomy, and justice.

摘要

近年来,人们越来越关注通过非药物手段来改变人类的神经活动。其中一种方法是脑刺激,它包括直接将电流应用于神经系统中的结构,或通过电磁感应间接应用电流。操纵大脑的干预措施通常被认为既有可能减轻毁灭性的大脑相关疾病,也有可能产生意想不到和不想要的后果。因此,尽管脑刺激技术为社会带来了巨大的好处,但也引发了许多伦理问题。在本文中,我们将在临床实践和生物医学研究的背景下讨论与脑刺激相关的各种困境。我们将调查涉及深部脑刺激、经颅磁刺激和经颅直流电刺激的当前工作。我们将反思它们之间的相关异同,并考虑在既定的医学伦理原则框架内可能出现的一些潜在问题:不伤害和有益、自主性和正义。

相似文献

6
The challenge of crafting policy for do-it-yourself brain stimulation.为自主式脑刺激制定政策面临的挑战。
J Med Ethics. 2015 May;41(5):410-2. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101458. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
9
Do-it-yourself brain stimulation: a regulatory model.自助式脑刺激:一种调节模型。
J Med Ethics. 2015 May;41(5):413-4. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101692. Epub 2013 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Risk and Benefit Sensitivity for Cognitive Treatments.评估认知治疗的风险和效益敏感性。
J Cogn Enhanc. 2025;9(2):214-229. doi: 10.1007/s41465-025-00319-3. Epub 2025 Mar 22.
6
Bioelectronic medicine: Preclinical insights and clinical advances.生物电子医学:临床前的洞察与临床进展。
Neuron. 2022 Nov 2;110(21):3627-3644. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.09.003. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
10

本文引用的文献

3
Deep Brain Stimulation and the Search for Identity.深部脑刺激与身份探寻
Neuroethics. 2013;6(3):499-511. doi: 10.1007/s12152-011-9100-1. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
5
Deep-brain stimulation for anorexia nervosa.深部脑刺激治疗神经性厌食症。
World Neurosurg. 2013 Sep-Oct;80(3-4):S29.e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.06.039. Epub 2012 Jun 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验