• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Selectivity of attrition in longitudinal studies of cognitive functioning.认知功能纵向研究中的损耗选择性。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2014 Jul;69(4):567-74. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt046. Epub 2013 Jun 2.
2
The relationship between prior functioning on cognitive and personality dimensions and subject attrition in longitudinal research.纵向研究中认知和人格维度的先前功能与研究对象损耗之间的关系。
J Gerontol. 1988 Jan;43(1):P12-7. doi: 10.1093/geronj/43.1.p12.
3
Attrition in Longitudinal Data is Primarily Selective with Respect to Level Rather than Rate of Change.纵向数据中的损耗主要是针对水平而非变化率的选择性。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2019 Jul;25(6):618-623. doi: 10.1017/S135561771900016X. Epub 2019 May 28.
4
Attrition from longitudinal ageing studies and performance across domains of cognitive functioning: an individual participant data meta-analysis.纵向衰老研究中的人员流失和认知功能各领域的表现:一项个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 7;14(3):e079241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079241.
5
Selective attrition and intraindividual variability in response time moderate cognitive change.选择性损耗和反应时间的个体内变异性会缓和认知变化。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2016;38(2):227-37. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2015.1102869. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
6
Factors associated with attrition in a longitudinal online study: results from the HaBIDS panel.与纵向在线研究中人员流失相关的因素:来自 HaBIDS 小组的结果。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Aug 31;17(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0408-3.
7
Personality-cognition relations across adulthood.人格-认知关系贯穿成年期。
Dev Psychol. 2011 Mar;47(2):303-10. doi: 10.1037/a0021816.
8
Predictors of attrition in a longitudinal cognitive aging study: the Maastricht Aging Study (MAAS).一项纵向认知衰老研究中的失访预测因素:马斯特里赫特衰老研究(MAAS)
J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Mar;55(3):216-23. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00473-5.
9
Risk of attrition in a longitudinal study of skin cancer: logistic and survival models can give different results.纵向研究皮肤癌患者失访风险:逻辑回归和生存模型可能得出不同的结果。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;66(8):888-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.03.008.
10
A systematic literature review of attrition between waves in longitudinal studies in the elderly shows a consistent pattern of dropout between differing studies.一项针对老年人纵向研究中各阶段损耗情况的系统文献综述显示,不同研究之间存在一致的失访模式。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Jan;58(1):13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.05.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Education and age of decline in verbal memory across countries: Evidence from the HRS, MHAS, and CHARLS.各国言语记忆衰退的教育程度与年龄差异:来自健康与退休研究(HRS)、中年及老年健康与生活状况调查(MHAS)和中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)的证据
J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2025 Jun 22;9:25424823251351631. doi: 10.1177/25424823251351631. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Association between impaired cognition status and activities of daily living among elderly: Evidence from longitudinal ageing study in India.老年人认知功能受损状况与日常生活活动之间的关联:来自印度纵向老龄化研究的证据。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Apr;14(4):1271-1278. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1314_24. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
3
Predictors of Retention in the 1Florida Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC) Over Two Waves.佛罗里达阿尔茨海默病研究中心(ADRC)两期随访中留存率的预测因素
J Appl Gerontol. 2024 Dec 10:7334648241302159. doi: 10.1177/07334648241302159.
4
Characterizing Performance on a Suite of English-Language NeuroUX Mobile Cognitive Tests in a US Adult Sample: Ecological Momentary Cognitive Testing Study.美国成人样本中一套英语语言神经 UX 移动认知测试的性能特征:生态瞬时认知测试研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 25;26:e51978. doi: 10.2196/51978.
5
Attrition from longitudinal ageing studies and performance across domains of cognitive functioning: an individual participant data meta-analysis.纵向衰老研究中的人员流失和认知功能各领域的表现:一项个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 7;14(3):e079241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079241.
6
Cognitive phenotypes in late-onset epilepsy: results from the atherosclerosis risk in communities study.迟发性癫痫的认知表型:社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究结果
Front Neurol. 2023 Aug 24;14:1230368. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1230368. eCollection 2023.
7
Exploring participant attrition in a longitudinal follow-up of older adults: the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW) Hamilton cohort.探讨老年人群纵向随访研究中的参与者流失情况:女性骨质疏松全球纵向研究(GLOW)汉密尔顿队列。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 25;13(7):e066594. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066594.
8
[Children's mental health: the role of screen time, parenting behavior, and parenting stress-a secondary data analysis of KiGGS and BELLA data].[儿童心理健康:屏幕使用时间、育儿行为和育儿压力的作用——基于德国儿童青少年健康访谈与检查调查(KiGGS)和巴伐利亚州早期学习与生活条件调查(BELLA)数据的二次数据分析]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 Jul;66(7):784-793. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03727-y. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
9
Longitudinal changes in gray matter correspond to changes in cognition across the lifespan: implications for theories of cognition.灰质的纵向变化与整个生命周期中的认知变化相对应:对认知理论的启示。
Neurobiol Aging. 2023 Sep;129:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2023.04.014. Epub 2023 May 4.
10
Midlife perceived stress is associated with cognitive decline across three decades.中年时期感知到的压力与三十年来的认知能力下降有关。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Mar 4;23(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03848-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the correspondence of different cognitive batteries.评估不同认知测试组合的一致性。
Assessment. 2014 Apr;21(2):131-42. doi: 10.1177/1073191113486690. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
2
Predicting missing biomarker data in a longitudinal study of Alzheimer disease.预测阿尔茨海默病纵向研究中的缺失生物标志物数据。
Neurology. 2012 May 1;78(18):1376-82. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318253d5b3. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
3
Influence of social desirability on age differences in self-reports of mood and personality.社会期望对情绪和个性自评的年龄差异的影响。
J Pers. 2011 Aug;79(4):741-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00700.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
4
Influence of age on practice effects in longitudinal neurocognitive change.年龄对纵向神经认知变化中练习效应的影响。
Neuropsychology. 2010 Sep;24(5):563-72. doi: 10.1037/a0019026.
5
Does the meaning of neurocognitive change change with age?神经认知变化的意义是否随年龄而变化?
Neuropsychology. 2010 Mar;24(2):273-8. doi: 10.1037/a0017284.
6
Contextual analysis of fluid intelligence.流体智力的情境分析
Intelligence. 2008;36(5):464-486. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2007.10.003.
7
Measuring cognitive function with age: the influence of selection by health and survival.测量不同年龄阶段的认知功能:健康与生存因素对样本选择的影响。
Epidemiology. 2008 May;19(3):440-7. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31816a1d31.
8
Implications of within-person variability in cognitive and neuropsychological functioning for the interpretation of change.认知和神经心理功能的个体内变异性对变化解释的影响。
Neuropsychology. 2007 Jul;21(4):401-11. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.21.4.401.
9
The Satisfaction With Life Scale.生活满意度量表。
J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.
10
Estimating age change in list recall in asset and health dynamics of the oldest-old: the effects of attrition bias and missing data treatment.估算高龄老人资产与健康动态中列表回忆的年龄变化:损耗偏差和缺失数据处理的影响。
Psychol Aging. 2005 Sep;20(3):460-75. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.20.3.460.

认知功能纵向研究中的损耗选择性。

Selectivity of attrition in longitudinal studies of cognitive functioning.

作者信息

Salthouse Timothy A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

出版信息

J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2014 Jul;69(4):567-74. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt046. Epub 2013 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbt046
PMID:23733858
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4049149/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Identify characteristics distinguishing people who do and do not continue to participate in a longitudinal study and determine whether the longitudinal changes for people who continue are representative of the changes that would have occurred had longitudinal data been available from all of the initial participants.

METHOD

Moderately large samples of returning (N = 2,082) and nonreturning (N = 1,698) participants across a wide age range (i.e., 18-97 years of age) performed a battery of cognitive tests and completed personality and mood questionnaires. Differences between the groups were examined with multiple regression analyses with age, returner status, and their interaction as predictors.

RESULTS

Compared with participants who did not return, returning participants at the initial occasion had higher levels of each cognitive ability and of certain personality characteristics (e.g., agreeableness and openness), but many of the differences were only apparent among adults older than 50 years of age. Importantly, there was no evidence that the longitudinal change for nonreturning participants would have been different from that among the participants who did return.

DISCUSSION

The phenomenon of selective attrition is more complex than often assumed, and it may not necessarily limit the generalizability of longitudinal comparisons.

摘要

目标

确定区分继续参与和不再参与纵向研究的人群的特征,并确定继续参与研究的人群的纵向变化是否代表了如果所有初始参与者都能提供纵向数据时可能发生的变化。

方法

从广泛的年龄范围(即18 - 97岁)中选取了数量适中的大量返回参与者样本(N = 2082)和未返回参与者样本(N = 1698),让他们进行一系列认知测试,并完成人格和情绪问卷。以年龄、返回者状态及其交互作用作为预测变量,通过多元回归分析来检验两组之间的差异。

结果

与未返回的参与者相比,初始阶段返回的参与者在各项认知能力以及某些人格特征(如宜人性和开放性)方面水平更高,但许多差异仅在50岁以上的成年人中较为明显。重要的是,没有证据表明未返回参与者的纵向变化会与返回参与者的纵向变化有所不同。

讨论

选择性损耗现象比通常认为的更为复杂,它不一定会限制纵向比较的普遍性。