• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在初级保健中,结构化教育肺康复计划对改善中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者健康状况的有效性:PRINCE 集群随机试验。

The effectiveness of a structured education pulmonary rehabilitation programme for improving the health status of people with moderate and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: the PRINCE cluster randomised trial.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, , Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

Thorax. 2013 Oct;68(10):922-8. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-203103. Epub 2013 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-203103
PMID:23736156
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3786654/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of a structured education pulmonary rehabilitation programme on the health status of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

DESIGN

Two-arm, cluster randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

32 general practices in the Republic of Ireland.

PARTICIPANTS

350 participants with a diagnosis of moderate or severe COPD.

INTERVENTION

Experimental group received a structured education pulmonary rehabilitation programme, delivered by the practice nurse and physiotherapist. Control group received usual care.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Health status as measured by the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) at baseline and at 12-14 weeks postcompletion of the programme.

RESULTS

Participants allocated to the intervention group had statistically significant higher mean change total CRQ scores (adjusted mean difference (MD) 1.11, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.87). However, the CI does not exclude a smaller difference than the one that was prespecified as clinically important. Participants allocated to the intervention group also had statistically significant higher mean CRQ Dyspnoea scores after intervention (adjusted MD 0.49, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.78) and CRQ Physical scores (adjusted MD 0.37, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.60). However, CIs for both the CRQ Dyspnoea and CRQ Physical subscales do not exclude smaller differences as prespecified as clinically important. No other statistically significant differences between groups were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

A primary care based structured education pulmonary rehabilitation programme is feasible and may increase local accessibility to people with moderate and severe COPD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN52403063.

摘要

目的

评估结构化教育肺康复计划对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者健康状况的影响。

设计

双臂、集群随机对照试验。

地点

爱尔兰共和国的 32 家普通诊所。

参与者

350 名中度或重度 COPD 患者。

干预

实验组接受由执业护士和物理治疗师提供的结构化教育肺康复计划。对照组接受常规护理。

主要观察指标

基线和计划完成后 12-14 周时使用慢性呼吸系统问卷(CRQ)评估的健康状况。

结果

分配到干预组的参与者的 CRQ 总分的平均变化具有统计学意义(调整后的平均差异(MD)为 1.11,95%置信区间(CI)为 0.35 至 1.87)。然而,CI 并不排除比预设的临床重要性更小的差异。干预后,分配到干预组的参与者的 CRQ 呼吸困难评分(调整后的 MD 为 0.49,95%CI 为 0.20 至 0.78)和 CRQ 体力评分(调整后的 MD 为 0.37,95%CI 为 0.14 至 0.60)也具有统计学意义更高。然而,CRQ 呼吸困难和 CRQ 体力亚量表的 CI 并不排除预设的临床重要性更小的差异。两组之间没有观察到其他具有统计学意义的差异。

结论

基于初级保健的结构化教育肺康复计划是可行的,并且可以增加中度和重度 COPD 患者获得该计划的便利性。

试验注册

ISRCTN52403063。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3100/3786654/262f8f979a51/thoraxjnl-2012-203103f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3100/3786654/6f0c31a193bf/thoraxjnl-2012-203103f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3100/3786654/262f8f979a51/thoraxjnl-2012-203103f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3100/3786654/6f0c31a193bf/thoraxjnl-2012-203103f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3100/3786654/262f8f979a51/thoraxjnl-2012-203103f02.jpg

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of a structured education pulmonary rehabilitation programme for improving the health status of people with moderate and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: the PRINCE cluster randomised trial.在初级保健中,结构化教育肺康复计划对改善中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者健康状况的有效性:PRINCE 集群随机试验。
Thorax. 2013 Oct;68(10):922-8. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-203103. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
2
A cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a structured pulmonary rehabilitation education programme for improving the health status of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): The PRINCE Study protocol.一项评价结构化肺康复教育方案对改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者健康状况有效性的整群随机对照试验:PRINCE 研究方案。
BMC Pulm Med. 2011 Jan 18;11:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-11-4.
3
The cost-effectiveness of a structured education pulmonary rehabilitation programme for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: the PRINCE cluster randomised trial.在初级保健中,针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病的结构化教育肺康复计划的成本效益:PRINCE 集群随机试验。
BMJ Open. 2013 Nov 25;3(11):e003479. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003479.
4
Interactive web-based pulmonary rehabilitation programme: a randomised controlled feasibility trial.交互式网络肺康复计划:一项随机对照可行性试验。
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 31;7(3):e013682. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013682.
5
The effects of maintenance schedules following pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺康复后的维持计划效果:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 11;5(3):e005921. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005921.
6
Upper limb exercise training for COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的上肢运动训练
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 15;11(11):CD011434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011434.pub2.
7
A behaviour change intervention to reduce sedentary time in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项旨在减少慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者久坐时间的行为改变干预措施:一项随机对照试验的方案。
J Physiother. 2017 Jul;63(3):182. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 May 16.
8
A self-management programme for COPD: a randomised controlled trial.慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理方案:一项随机对照试验。
Eur Respir J. 2014 Dec;44(6):1538-47. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00047814. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
9
The impact of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation on people with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomised controlled trial.基于家庭的肺康复对轻度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Respir J. 2020 Apr;14(4):335-344. doi: 10.1111/crj.13138. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
10
A Lifestyle Physical Activity Intervention for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A Randomized Controlled Trial.生活方式体力活动干预对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 May;13(5):617-26. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201508-508OC.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimal vs Specialized Exercise Equipment for Pulmonary Rehabilitation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.用于肺康复的简易与专用运动设备:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2526616. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.26616.
2
Effects of Physical Exercise on Walking Distance and Functional Limitations in Patients with Chronic Dyspnea.体育锻炼对慢性呼吸困难患者步行距离和功能受限的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 30;61(4):636. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040636.
3
The Comprehensive Resilience-building psychosocial Intervention (CREST) for people with dementia in the community: a feasibility and acceptability study.

本文引用的文献

1
Responsiveness of Various Exercise-Testing Protocols to Therapeutic Interventions in COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)中各种运动测试方案对治疗干预的反应性。
Pulm Med. 2013;2013:410748. doi: 10.1155/2013/410748. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
2
Developing a structured education programme for clients with COPD.为慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者制定结构化教育计划。
Br J Community Nurs. 2011 May;16(5):231-7. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2011.16.5.231.
3
A cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a structured pulmonary rehabilitation education programme for improving the health status of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): The PRINCE Study protocol.
针对社区中痴呆症患者的综合心理社会复原力建设干预措施(CREST):一项可行性和可接受性研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Nov 9;10(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01568-3.
4
Immediate and One-Year Outcomes of an Asthma-Tailored Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programme in Overweight and Obese People with Difficult-to-Treat Asthma.针对超重和肥胖的难治性哮喘患者的哮喘定制肺康复计划的即时和一年期结果
J Asthma Allergy. 2024 Sep 25;17:911-928. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S466894. eCollection 2024.
5
An embedded qualitative study of the experiences of people with dementia, their caregivers and volunteer older adults who participated in the CREST resilience-building psychosocial intervention.一项关于参与 CREST 韧性建设心理社会干预的痴呆症患者、照护者和老年志愿者的体验的嵌入式定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Sep 25;24(1):780. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05374-7.
6
Clinically important changes and adverse events with centre-based or home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic respiratory disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.以中心或家庭为基础的肺康复治疗慢性呼吸系统疾病的临床重要变化和不良事件:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Chron Respir Dis. 2024 Jan-Dec;21:14799731241277808. doi: 10.1177/14799731241277808.
7
Educational interventions for health professionals managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care.针对初级保健中管理慢性阻塞性肺疾病的卫生专业人员的教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 6;5(5):CD012652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012652.pub2.
8
Defining Modern Pulmonary Rehabilitation. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.定义现代肺康复。美国胸科学会官方研讨会报告。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 May;18(5):e12-e29. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202102-146ST.
9
The feasibility of a Comprehensive Resilience-building psychosocial Intervention (CREST) for people with dementia in the community: protocol for a non-randomised feasibility study.针对社区中痴呆症患者的综合心理韧性建设社会心理干预(CREST)的可行性:一项非随机可行性研究方案。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Nov 16;6(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00701-2.
10
Do Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases (COPD) Self-Management Interventions Consider Health Literacy and Patient Activation? A Systematic Review.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)自我管理干预措施是否考虑了健康素养和患者能动性?一项系统综述。
J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 28;9(3):646. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030646.
一项评价结构化肺康复教育方案对改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者健康状况有效性的整群随机对照试验:PRINCE 研究方案。
BMC Pulm Med. 2011 Jan 18;11:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-11-4.
4
WestREN: a description of an Irish academic general practice research network.西部研究网:一个爱尔兰学术全科医学研究网络的描述。
BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Oct 6;11:74. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-74.
5
Making pulmonary rehabilitation a success in COPD.使 COPD 患者肺康复治疗取得成功。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2010 Sep 1;140:w13067. doi: 10.4414/smw.2010.13067. eCollection 2010.
6
Putting research into context--revisited.将研究置于背景之中——再探讨。
Lancet. 2010 Jul 3;376(9734):10-1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61001-X.
7
A randomised 2 x 2 trial of community versus hospital pulmonary rehabilitation, followed by telephone or conventional follow-up.一项社区与医院肺康复的随机 2 x 2 试验,随后进行电话或常规随访。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Feb;14(6):i-v, vii-xi, 1-140. doi: 10.3310/hta14060.
8
Self-management education for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的自我管理教育
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17(4):CD002990. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002990.pub2.
9
Seven-year time course of lung function, symptoms, health-related quality of life, and exercise tolerance in COPD patients undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation programs.接受肺康复计划的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者肺功能、症状、健康相关生活质量和运动耐力的七年病程
Respir Med. 2007 Sep;101(9):1961-70. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.04.007. Epub 2007 May 24.
10
Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的肺康复治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD003793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003793.pub2.