欧洲心理健康研究重点：ROAMER 项目中各国利益相关者协会的调查。
Priorities for mental health research in Europe: A survey among national stakeholders' associations within the ROAMER project.
机构信息
Department of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN, Naples, Italy.
出版信息
World Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;12(2):165-70. doi: 10.1002/wps.20052.
Abstract
Within the ROAMER project, funded by the European Commission, a survey was conducted with national associations/organizations of psychiatrists, other mental health professionals, users and/or carers, and psychiatric trainees in the 27 countries of the European Union, aiming to explore their views about priorities for mental health research in Europe. One hundred and eight associations/organizations returned the questionnaire. The five most frequently selected research priorities were early detection and management of mental disorders, quality of mental health services, prevention of mental disorders, rehabilitation and social inclusion, and new medications for mental disorders. All these areas, except the last one, were among the top ten research priorities according to all categories of stakeholders, along with stigma and discrimination. These results seem to support the recent argument that some rebalancing in favor of psychosocial and health service studies may be needed in psychiatric research.
摘要
在欧盟委员会资助的 ROAMER 项目中，对欧盟 27 个国家的精神病学家、其他心理健康专业人员、使用者和/或照顾者、以及精神科培训生的国家协会/组织进行了一项调查，旨在探讨他们对欧洲精神卫生研究优先事项的看法。有 108 个协会/组织返回了调查问卷。五个最常被选中的研究重点是精神障碍的早期发现和管理、精神卫生服务的质量、精神障碍的预防、康复和社会包容，以及治疗精神障碍的新药物。除最后一个外，根据所有利益相关者的类别，所有这些领域都在前十大研究重点之列，此外还有耻辱和歧视。这些结果似乎支持了最近的观点，即精神科研究可能需要在一定程度上重新平衡，以支持心理社会和卫生服务研究。
相似文献
1
Priorities for mental health research in Europe: A survey among national stakeholders' associations within the ROAMER project.欧洲心理健康研究重点：ROAMER 项目中各国利益相关者协会的调查。
World Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;12(2):165-70. doi: 10.1002/wps.20052.
2
ROAMER: roadmap for mental health research in Europe.漫游者：欧洲心理健康研究路线图。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2014 Jan;23 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):1-14. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1406.
3
A descriptive survey study of violence management and priorities among psychiatric staff in mental health services, across seventeen european countries.一项针对17个欧洲国家精神卫生服务机构中精神科工作人员的暴力管理及工作重点的描述性调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 19;17(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-1988-7.
4
Research priorities for public mental health in Europe: recommendations of the ROAMER project.欧洲公共心理健康研究重点：漫游者项目的建议
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Apr;25(2):249-54. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku232. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
6
Research priorities in mental health, Part 2: an evaluationof the current research effort against stakeholders' priorities.精神卫生研究重点，第2部分：对照利益相关方的重点对当前研究工作的评估
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2002 Jun;36(3):327-39. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2001.01024.x.
7
Public mental health research in Europe: a systematic mapping for the ROAMER project.欧洲的公共心理健康研究：ROAMER项目的系统映射
Eur J Public Health. 2014 Dec;24(6):955-60. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku055. Epub 2014 May 14.
8
Horizon 2020 priorities in clinical mental health research: results of a consensus-based ROAMER expert survey.“地平线2020”临床心理健康研究重点：基于共识的ROAMER专家调查结果
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Oct 21;11(10):10915-39. doi: 10.3390/ijerph111010915.
9
Mapping research activity on mental health disorders in Europe: study protocol for the Mapping_NCD project.欧洲心理健康障碍研究活动图谱绘制：Mapping_NCD项目研究方案
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 May 26;14(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0111-6.
10
Exploring stakeholders' views of medical education research priorities: a national survey.探索利益相关者对医学教育研究重点的看法：一项全国性调查。
Med Educ. 2014 Nov;48(11):1078-91. doi: 10.1111/medu.12522.
引用本文的文献
1
Development of a core outcome set for psychological therapy trials on acute psychiatric inpatient wards.制定急性精神病住院病房心理治疗试验的核心结局集。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 19;24(1):821. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06294-x.
2
Effectiveness of a universal personalized intervention for the prevention of anxiety disorders: Protocol of a randomized controlled trial (the prevANS project).一种预防焦虑症的通用个性化干预措施的有效性：一项随机对照试验方案（prevANS项目）
Internet Interv. 2023 Jun 22;34:100640. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100640. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Efficacy of Psychosocial and Psychological Interventions in Addition to Drug Therapy to Improve Global Functioning of Inpatients with Schizophrenia Spectrum and Mood Disorders: A Real-World Observational Study.除药物治疗外，心理社会和心理干预对改善精神分裂症谱系和心境障碍住院患者整体功能的疗效：一项真实世界观察性研究
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2023 Aug 30;19:1887-1897. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S418627. eCollection 2023.
4
Methodological procedures for priority setting mental health research: a systematic review summarising the methods, designs and frameworks involved with priority setting.优先设置心理健康研究的方法学程序：一项系统综述，总结了优先设置所涉及的方法、设计和框架。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jun 26;21(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01003-8.
5
Assessing the impact of stigma reduction interventions in Iran: A qualitative study from the perspective of mental health stakeholders.评估伊朗减少污名化干预措施的影响：心理健康利益相关者的定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 8;10:1027002. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1027002. eCollection 2022.
6
Meals, Microbiota and Mental Health in Children and Adolescents (MMM-Study): A protocol for an observational longitudinal case-control study.儿童和青少年膳食、微生物群和心理健康（MMM-研究）：一项观察性纵向病例对照研究方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 1;17(9):e0273855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273855. eCollection 2022.
7
Keeping the Agenda Current: Evolution of Australian Lived Experience Mental Health Research Priorities.保持议程的时效性：澳大利亚生活体验心理健康研究重点的演变。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 1;19(13):8101. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138101.
8
Mental Health Peer Worker Perspectives on Resources Developed from Lived Experience Research Findings: A Delphi Study.心理健康同伴工作者对从生活经验研究结果中开发的资源的看法：德尔菲研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 24;19(7):3881. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073881.
9
Mortality gap and physical comorbidity of people with severe mental disorders: the public health scandal.严重精神障碍患者的死亡率差距与身体共病：公共卫生丑闻。
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 13;20(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12991-021-00374-y.
10
How to improve the physical health of people with severe mental illness? A multicentric randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of a lifestyle group intervention.如何改善患有严重精神疾病人群的身体健康状况？一项关于生活方式团体干预效果的多中心随机对照试验。
Eur Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 23;64(1):e72. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.2253.
本文引用的文献
1
Rebalancing academic psychiatry: why it needs to happen - and soon.重新平衡学术精神病学：为什么需要这样做——而且要尽快。
Br J Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;201(6):421-2. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.118695.
2
The WPA-WHO Global Survey of Psychiatrists' Attitudes Towards Mental Disorders Classification.WPA-WHO 全球精神科医生对精神障碍分类态度调查。
World Psychiatry. 2011 Jun;10(2):118-31. doi: 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2011.tb00034.x.
3
Developing evidence-based recommendations in public health--incorporating the views of practitioners, service users and user representatives.制定公共卫生领域基于证据的建议——纳入从业者、服务使用者及使用者代表的意见。
Health Expect. 2008 Mar;11(1):3-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00471.x.
4
Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach.让消费者参与国民保健服务体系的研发议程设定：制定基于证据的方法。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Apr;8(15):1-148, III-IV. doi: 10.3310/hta8150.
5
What constitutes success? The relative priority of service users' and clinicians' views of mental health services.什么构成成功？服务使用者和临床医生对心理健康服务看法的相对优先性。
Br J Psychiatry. 2001 Jul;179:9-10. doi: 10.1192/bjp.179.1.9.
Zotero 插件