Department of Experimental Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2013;2013:862423. doi: 10.1155/2013/862423. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
Ever since the discovery of free radicals, many hypotheses on the deleterious actions of reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been proposed. However, increasing evidence advocates the necessity of ROS for cellular homeostasis. ROS are generated as inherent by-products of aerobic metabolism and are tightly controlled by antioxidants. Conversely, when produced in excess or when antioxidants are depleted, ROS can inflict damage to lipids, proteins, and DNA. Such a state of oxidative stress is associated with many pathological conditions and closely correlated to oxygen consumption. Although the deleterious effects of ROS can potentially be reduced by restoring the imbalance between production and clearance of ROS through administration of antioxidants (AOs), the dosage and type of AOs should be tailored to the location and nature of oxidative stress. This paper describes several pathways of ROS signaling in cellular homeostasis. Further, we review the function of ROS in cardiovascular pathology and the effects of AOs on cardiovascular outcomes with emphasis on the so-called oxidative paradox.
自从自由基被发现以来,人们提出了许多关于活性氧(ROS)有害作用的假说。然而,越来越多的证据表明 ROS 对于细胞内稳态是必要的。ROS 是有氧代谢的固有副产物产生的,并受到抗氧化剂的严格控制。相反,当产生过多或抗氧化剂耗尽时,ROS 会对脂质、蛋白质和 DNA 造成损害。这种氧化应激状态与许多病理状况有关,并与耗氧量密切相关。虽然通过给予抗氧化剂(AO)来恢复 ROS 的产生和清除之间的失衡,可以减轻 ROS 的有害影响,但 AO 的剂量和类型应根据氧化应激的位置和性质进行调整。本文描述了 ROS 在细胞内稳态中的几种信号通路。此外,我们还综述了 ROS 在心血管病理中的作用以及 AO 对心血管结局的影响,重点介绍了所谓的氧化悖论。