• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy vs. 3D Conformal Radiation Therapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal.调强放射治疗与三维适形放射治疗用于肛管鳞状细胞癌的比较
Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2013 Mar;6(2):39-45.
2
Intensity modulated radiotherapy for anal canal squamous cell carcinoma: A 16-year single institution experience.肛管鳞状细胞癌的调强放射治疗:一项16年单机构经验。
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2021 Feb 23;28:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.02.002. eCollection 2021 May.
3
Comparison of bone marrow sparing intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) in carcinoma of anal canal: a prospective study.比较保骨髓调强放疗(IMRT)和三维适形放疗(3DCRT)在肛门管癌中的应用:一项前瞻性研究。
Ann Transl Med. 2016 Feb;4(4):70. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2016.01.37.
4
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy achieves better local control compared to three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for T4-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma.对于T4期鼻咽癌,与三维适形放射治疗相比,调强放射治疗能实现更好的局部控制。
Oncotarget. 2017 Feb 21;8(8):14068-14077. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12736.
5
Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy May Improve Local-Regional Tumor Control for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Compared With Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy.与三维适形放疗相比,调强放疗可能改善局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的局部区域肿瘤控制。
Oncologist. 2016 Dec;21(12):1530-1537. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0155. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
6
Comparative outcomes for three-dimensional conformal versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for esophageal cancer.食管癌三维适形放疗与调强放疗的比较结果
Dis Esophagus. 2015 May-Jun;28(4):352-7. doi: 10.1111/dote.12203. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
7
Influence of radiation treatment technique (IMRT vs. 3D-RT) on acute toxicity and prognostic factors for survival for anal cancer.放疗技术(调强放疗与三维适形放疗)对肛门癌急性毒性和生存预后因素的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 19;12(1):19914. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24362-8.
8
Clinical outcomes for gastric cancer following adjuvant chemoradiation utilizing intensity modulated versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.采用调强放疗与三维适形放疗进行辅助放化疗后胃癌的临床结局
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 9;9(1):e82642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082642. eCollection 2014.
9
Retrospective comparison of side effects and outcomes of three-dimensional conformal vs. intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the palliative-intent treatment (4 Gy × 5 daily fractions) of canine intranasal tumors (2010-2017).2010年至2017年犬鼻内肿瘤姑息性治疗(4 Gy×每日5次分割)中三维适形放疗与调强放疗的副作用及结果的回顾性比较
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Mar 14;10:1011949. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1011949. eCollection 2023.
10
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy improves survival and reduces treatment time in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus: A National Cancer Data Base study.调强放疗可改善肛门鳞癌患者的生存并缩短治疗时间:一项国家癌症数据库研究。
Cancer. 2018 Nov 15;124(22):4383-4392. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31721. Epub 2018 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Anal carcinoma - exploring the epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment.肛管癌——探索其流行病学、危险因素、病理生理学、诊断及治疗。
World J Exp Med. 2024 Sep 20;14(3):98525. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v14.i3.98525.
2
Recent Advances in the Management of Anal Cancer.肛管癌治疗的最新进展
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Nov 21;11(23):3010. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11233010.
3
Capecitabine/Mitomycin versus 5-Fluorouracil/Mitomycin in Combination with Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Anal Cancer.卡培他滨/丝裂霉素与 5-氟尿嘧啶/丝裂霉素联合同时整合强度调节放射治疗用于肛门癌。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Sep 18;30(9):8563-8574. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30090621.
4
Impact of dose escalation on colostomy-free survival and treatment outcome in squamous cell anal carcinoma.剂量递增对肛门鳞癌结肠造口术无生存和治疗结果的影响。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2023 Aug;199(8):749-760. doi: 10.1007/s00066-023-02056-y. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
5
Influence of radiation treatment technique (IMRT vs. 3D-RT) on acute toxicity and prognostic factors for survival for anal cancer.放疗技术(调强放疗与三维适形放疗)对肛门癌急性毒性和生存预后因素的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 19;12(1):19914. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24362-8.
6
Development and validation of prognostic models for anal cancer outcomes using distributed learning: protocol for the international multi-centre atomCAT2 study.利用分布式学习开发和验证肛门癌预后模型:国际多中心atomCAT2研究方案
Diagn Progn Res. 2022 Aug 4;6(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s41512-022-00128-8.
7
Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Associated With Improved Survival Outcome in Anal Cancer.调强放疗与肛管癌患者生存结局改善相关
Front Oncol. 2022 May 26;12:911925. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.911925. eCollection 2022.
8
Practice of radiation therapy for anal cancer in Austria-a survey on behalf of the Austrian radiation oncology society gastrointestinal tumor group (ÖGRO-GIT).奥地利肛门癌放射治疗实践——代表奥地利放射肿瘤学会胃肠肿瘤组(ÖGRO-GIT)的调查。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2021 Nov;197(11):953-961. doi: 10.1007/s00066-021-01842-w. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
9
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Improves Outcomes in Definitive Radiochemotherapy for Anal Cancer Whilst Reducing Acute Toxicities and Increasing Treatment Compliance.容积调强弧形放疗可改善肛管癌根治性放化疗的疗效,同时降低急性毒性并提高治疗依从性。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 21;13(11):2533. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112533.
10
Evolution of the Role of Radiotherapy for Anal Cancer.肛管癌放射治疗作用的演变
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 10;13(6):1208. doi: 10.3390/cancers13061208.

本文引用的文献

1
RTOG 0529: a phase 2 evaluation of dose-painted intensity modulated radiation therapy in combination with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-C for the reduction of acute morbidity in carcinoma of the anal canal.RTOG 0529:评估剂量描绘调强放疗联合氟尿嘧啶和丝裂霉素 C 用于降低肛门管癌急性发病率的 2 期研究。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 May 1;86(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.09.023. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
2
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus conventional radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal.调强放疗与常规放疗治疗肛管鳞癌的比较。
Cancer. 2011 Aug 1;117(15):3342-51. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25901. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
3
Dose-painted intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer: a multi-institutional report of acute toxicity and response to therapy.剂量描绘调强放疗治疗肛门癌:多机构报告的急性毒性和治疗反应。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.030. Epub 2010 Nov 20.
4
Impact of overall treatment time on survival and local control in patients with anal cancer: a pooled data analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trials 87-04 and 98-11.总体治疗时间对肛门癌患者生存和局部控制的影响:放射治疗肿瘤学组试验 87-04 和 98-11 的汇总数据分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec 1;28(34):5061-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.1351. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
5
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal malignancies: a preliminary toxicity and disease outcomes analysis.调强放疗治疗肛门恶性肿瘤:初步毒性和疾病结局分析。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Dec 1;78(5):1413-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.046. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
6
Fluorouracil, mitomycin, and radiotherapy vs fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiotherapy for carcinoma of the anal canal: a randomized controlled trial.氟尿嘧啶、丝裂霉素与放疗联合氟尿嘧啶、顺铂与放疗治疗肛管癌的随机对照试验
JAMA. 2008 Apr 23;299(16):1914-21. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.16.1914.
7
Squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal canal: predictors of treatment outcome.肛管鳞状细胞癌:治疗结果的预测因素
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Feb;51(2):147-53. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9125-z. Epub 2008 Jan 8.
8
Optimal organ-sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) regimen for the treatment of locally advanced anal canal carcinoma: a comparison of conventional and IMRT plans.用于治疗局部晚期肛管癌的最佳保留器官调强放射治疗(IMRT)方案:传统方案与IMRT方案的比较
Radiat Oncol. 2007 Nov 15;2:41. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-2-41.
9
Concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal canal cancer patients: a multicenter experience.肛管癌患者同步化疗与调强放射治疗:多中心经验
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct 10;25(29):4581-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.0170.
10
Chemoradiotherapy in patients with anal cancer: impact of length of unplanned treatment interruption on outcome.
Acta Oncol. 2006;45(6):728-35. doi: 10.1080/02841860600726729.

调强放射治疗与三维适形放射治疗用于肛管鳞状细胞癌的比较

Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy vs. 3D Conformal Radiation Therapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal.

作者信息

Chuong Michael D, Freilich Jessica M, Hoffe Sarah E, Fulp William, Weber Jill M, Almhanna Khaldoun, Dinwoodie William, Rao Nikhil, Meredith Kenneth L, Shridhar Ravi

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology.

出版信息

Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2013 Mar;6(2):39-45.

PMID:23745158
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3674462/
Abstract

PURPOSE

We compared our institutional experience using 3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) vs. IMRT (intensity-modulated radiation therapy) for anal cancer.

METHODS

We performed a single-institution retrospective review of all patients with squamous cell carcinoma anal cancer treated from September 2000 through September 2011, using definitive chemoradiation with curative intent.

RESULTS

This study included 89 consecutive patients (37 3DCRT, 52 IMRT). Median follow-up for all patients, IMRT patients alone, and CRT patients alone was 26.5 months (range, 3.5-133.6), 20 months (range, 3.5-125.5), and 61.9 months (range, 7.6-133.6), respectively. Three-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional control (LRC), and colostomy-free survival (CFS) were 91.1%, 82.3%, 90.8%, and 91.3% in the IMRT cohort and 86.1%, 72.5%, 91.9%, and 93.7% in the 3DCRT group (all P > .1). More patients in the 3DCRT group required a treatment break (11 vs. 4; P = .006), although the difference in median treatment break duration was not significant (12.2 vs. 8.0 days; P = .35). Survival did not differ based on whether a treatment break was needed (all P > .1). Acute grade ≥3 nonhematologic toxicity was decreased in the IMRT cohort (21.1 vs. 59.5%; P < .0001). Acute grade ≥3 skin toxicity was worse in the 3DCRT group (P < .0001), whereas an improvement in late grade ≥3 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was observed in the IMRT patients (P = .012).

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the largest thus far to compare 3DCRT and IMRT for definitive treatment of anal cancer. Although long-term outcomes did not significantly differ based on RT technique, a marked decrease in adverse effects and the need for a treatment break was achieved with IMRT.

摘要

目的

我们比较了本机构使用三维适形放射治疗(3DCRT)与调强放射治疗(IMRT)治疗肛管癌的经验。

方法

我们对2000年9月至2011年9月期间接受根治性放化疗的所有肛管鳞状细胞癌患者进行了单机构回顾性研究。

结果

本研究纳入了89例连续患者(37例接受3DCRT,52例接受IMRT)。所有患者、仅IMRT患者和仅CRT患者的中位随访时间分别为26.5个月(范围3.5 - 133.6个月)、20个月(范围3.5 - 125.5个月)和61.9个月(范围7.6 - 133.6个月)。IMRT队列的3年总生存率(OS)、无进展生存率(PFS)、局部区域控制率(LRC)和无结肠造口生存率(CFS)分别为91.1%、82.3%、90.8%和91.3%,3DCRT组分别为86.1%、72.5%、91.9%和93.7%(所有P > 0.1)。3DCRT组更多患者需要治疗中断(11例 vs. 4例;P = 0.006),尽管中位治疗中断持续时间的差异不显著(12.2天 vs. 8.0天;P = 0.35)。生存情况在是否需要治疗中断方面无差异(所有P > 0.1)。IMRT队列中急性≥3级非血液学毒性有所降低(21.1% vs. 59.5%;P < 0.0001)。3DCRT组急性≥3级皮肤毒性更严重(P < 0.0001),而IMRT患者晚期≥3级胃肠道(GI)毒性有所改善(P = 0.012)。

结论

本研究是迄今为止比较3DCRT和IMRT对肛管癌进行根治性治疗的最大规模研究。尽管基于放疗技术的长期结果无显著差异,但IMRT显著降低了不良反应和治疗中断的需求。