• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联合协变量调整的生物标志物 ROC 分析。

ROC analysis in biomarker combination with covariate adjustment.

机构信息

Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Branch, Division of Epidemiology, Statistics & Prevention Research, NIH/NICHD, 6100 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2013 Jul;20(7):874-82. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.03.009.

DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2013.03.009
PMID:23747153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3682803/
Abstract

RATIONAL AND OBJECTIVES

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis is often used to find the optimal combination of biomarkers. When the subject level covariates affect the magnitude and/or accuracy of the biomarkers, the combination rule should take into account of the covariate adjustment. The authors propose two new biomarker combination methods that make use of the covariate information.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The first method is to maximize the area under the covariate-adjusted ROC curve (AAUC). To overcome the limitations of the AAUC measure, the authors further proposed the area under covariate-standardized ROC curve (SAUC), which is an extension of the covariate-specific ROC curve. With a series of simulation studies, the proposed optimal AAUC and SAUC methods are compared with the optimal AUC method that ignores the covariates. The biomarker combination methods are illustrated by an example from Alzheimer's disease research.

RESULTS

The simulation results indicate that the optimal AAUC combination performs well in the current study population. The optimal SAUC method is flexible to choose any reference populations, and allows the results to be generalized to different populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed optimal AAUC and SAUC approaches successfully address the covariate adjustment problem in estimating the optimal marker combination. The optimal SAUC method is preferred for practical use, because the biomarker combination rule can be easily evaluated for different population of interest.

摘要

目的和意义

受试者工作特征(ROC)分析常用于寻找生物标志物的最佳组合。当个体水平的协变量影响生物标志物的幅度和/或准确性时,组合规则应考虑协变量调整。作者提出了两种新的利用协变量信息的生物标志物组合方法。

材料和方法

第一种方法是最大化协变量调整的 ROC 曲线下面积(AAUC)。为了克服 AAUC 度量的局限性,作者进一步提出了协变量标准化 ROC 曲线下面积(SAUC),这是协变量特异性 ROC 曲线的扩展。通过一系列模拟研究,将提出的最优 AAUC 和 SAUC 方法与忽略协变量的最优 AUC 方法进行了比较。通过阿尔茨海默病研究的一个例子说明了生物标志物组合方法。

结果

模拟结果表明,最优 AAUC 组合在当前研究人群中表现良好。最优 SAUC 方法灵活,可选择任何参考人群,并允许将结果推广到不同的人群。

结论

提出的最优 AAUC 和 SAUC 方法成功地解决了在估计最优标记组合时的协变量调整问题。最优 SAUC 方法更适合实际使用,因为可以轻松评估不同感兴趣人群的生物标志物组合规则。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc09/3682803/9eca187de1de/nihms-470443-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc09/3682803/7f924b1cb523/nihms-470443-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc09/3682803/3e9f380b1328/nihms-470443-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc09/3682803/9eca187de1de/nihms-470443-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc09/3682803/7f924b1cb523/nihms-470443-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc09/3682803/3e9f380b1328/nihms-470443-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc09/3682803/9eca187de1de/nihms-470443-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
ROC analysis in biomarker combination with covariate adjustment.联合协变量调整的生物标志物 ROC 分析。
Acad Radiol. 2013 Jul;20(7):874-82. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.03.009.
2
Covariate adjustment in estimating the area under ROC curve with partially missing gold standard.在估计具有部分缺失金标准的ROC曲线下面积时的协变量调整
Biometrics. 2013 Mar;69(1):91-100. doi: 10.1111/biom.12001. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
3
Combining biomarkers for classification with covariate adjustment.结合生物标志物进行分类并进行协变量调整。
Stat Med. 2017 Jul 10;36(15):2347-2362. doi: 10.1002/sim.7274. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
4
Impact of Methodological Assumptions and Covariates on the Cutoff Estimation in ROC Analysis.方法学假设和协变量对ROC分析中截断点估计的影响
Biom J. 2025 Jun;67(3):e70053. doi: 10.1002/bimj.70053.
5
Estimation of covariate-specific time-dependent ROC curves in the presence of missing biomarkers.存在缺失生物标志物时协变量特定的时间依赖性ROC曲线估计
Biometrics. 2015 Sep;71(3):666-76. doi: 10.1111/biom.12312. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
6
Covariate adjustment in continuous biomarker assessment.连续生物标志物评估中的协变量调整。
Biometrics. 2023 Mar;79(1):39-48. doi: 10.1111/biom.13601. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
7
Addressing subject heterogeneity in time-dependent discrimination for biomarker evaluation.针对生物标志物评估中的时依性判别中的受试个体异质性问题。
Stat Med. 2024 Mar 30;43(7):1341-1353. doi: 10.1002/sim.10024. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
8
Adjusting the generalized ROC curve for covariates.针对协变量调整广义ROC曲线。
Stat Med. 2004 Nov 15;23(21):3319-31. doi: 10.1002/sim.1908.
9
Analyzing heterogeneity in biomarker discriminative performance through partial time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve modeling.通过部分时依接收器工作特征曲线建模分析生物标志物判别性能的异质性。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Aug;33(8):1424-1436. doi: 10.1177/09622802241262521. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
10
Semiparametric estimator for the covariate-specific receiver operating characteristic curve.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2025 Mar;34(3):594-614. doi: 10.1177/09622802241311458. Epub 2025 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
ROC Analysis of Biomarker Combinations in Fragile X Syndrome-Specific Clinical Trials: Evaluating Treatment Efficacy via Exploratory Biomarkers.脆性X综合征特异性临床试验中生物标志物组合的ROC分析:通过探索性生物标志物评估治疗效果。
Transl Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 28;15(1):323. doi: 10.1038/s41398-025-03558-2.
2
Comparing the power of obesity indices to predict cardiovascular diseases at different ages: An application of conditional time-dependent ROC curve in Healthy Heart Cohort of Yazd, Iran.比较不同年龄阶段肥胖指数对心血管疾病的预测能力:条件性时间依赖ROC曲线在伊朗亚兹德健康心脏队列中的应用
ARYA Atheroscler. 2025;21(1):36-43. doi: 10.48305/arya.2025.42469.2938.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Covariate adjustment in estimating the area under ROC curve with partially missing gold standard.在估计具有部分缺失金标准的ROC曲线下面积时的协变量调整
Biometrics. 2013 Mar;69(1):91-100. doi: 10.1111/biom.12001. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
2
Adjusting for covariate effects on classification accuracy using the covariate-adjusted receiver operating characteristic curve.使用协变量调整后的受试者工作特征曲线来调整协变量对分类准确性的影响。
Biometrika. 2009 Jun;96(2):371-382. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asp002. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
3
A min-max combination of biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy.
The diagnostic likelihood ratio function and modified test for trend: Identifying, evaluating, and validating nontraditional biomarkers in case-control studies.
诊断似然比函数和趋势修正检验:病例对照研究中识别、评估和验证非传统生物标志物。
Stat Med. 2023 Dec 20;42(29):5313-5337. doi: 10.1002/sim.9912. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
4
Covariate-specific evaluation of continuous biomarker.连续生物标志物的协变量特异性评估。
Stat Med. 2023 Mar 30;42(7):953-969. doi: 10.1002/sim.9652. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
5
Normalized sensitivity of multi-dimensional body composition biomarkers for risk change prediction.多维身体成分生物标志物对风险变化预测的归一化敏感性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 20;12(1):12375. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16142-1.
6
Noninfectious influencers of early-onset sepsis biomarkers.非感染性因素对早发性败血症生物标志物的影响。
Pediatr Res. 2022 Jan;91(2):425-431. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01861-4. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
7
Metabolic Profiling of Neocortical Tissue Discriminates Alzheimer's Disease from Mild Cognitive Impairment, High Pathology Controls, and Normal Controls.代谢组学分析新皮质组织可区分阿尔茨海默病、高病理对照和正常对照。
J Proteome Res. 2021 Sep 3;20(9):4303-4317. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00290. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
8
Developing biomarker combinations in multicenter studies via direct maximization and penalization.通过直接最大化和惩罚在多中心研究中开发生物标志物组合。
Stat Med. 2020 Oct 30;39(24):3412-3426. doi: 10.1002/sim.8673. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
9
Association between 9-minute walk/run test and obesity among children and adolescents: evidence for criterion-referenced cut-points.9分钟步行/跑步测试与儿童及青少年肥胖之间的关联:标准参照切点的证据
PeerJ. 2020 Feb 18;8:e8651. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8651. eCollection 2020.
10
Application of latent class analysis in diagnosis of graft-versus-host disease by serum markers after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.应用潜在类别分析诊断异基因造血干细胞移植后血清标志物移植物抗宿主病。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 27;10(1):3633. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60524-2.
采用最小最大组合生物标志物提高诊断准确性。
Stat Med. 2011 Jul 20;30(16):2005-14. doi: 10.1002/sim.4238. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
4
Semiparametric estimation of the covariate-specific ROC curve in presence of ignorable verification bias.存在可忽略验证性偏倚时协变量特异性ROC曲线的半参数估计
Biometrics. 2011 Sep;67(3):906-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01562.x. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
5
On the convexity of ROC curves estimated from radiological test results.基于放射学检测结果估计的 ROC 曲线的凸性。
Acad Radiol. 2010 Aug;17(8):960-968.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.04.001.
6
Adjusting for covariates in studies of diagnostic, screening, or prognostic markers: an old concept in a new setting.在诊断、筛查或预后标志物研究中对协变量进行调整:新背景下的一个旧概念。
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Jul 1;168(1):89-97. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn099. Epub 2008 May 13.
7
Statistical combination schemes of repeated diagnostic test data.重复诊断测试数据的统计组合方案。
Acad Radiol. 2006 May;13(5):566-72. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2006.01.052.
8
A quadratic model for combining quantitative diagnostic assessments from radiologist and computer in computer-aided diagnosis.一种用于在计算机辅助诊断中结合放射科医生和计算机的定量诊断评估的二次模型。
Acad Radiol. 2006 Feb;13(2):140-51. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.11.004.
9
Effect of correlation on combining diagnostic information from two images of the same patient.
Med Phys. 2005 Nov;32(11):3329-38. doi: 10.1118/1.2064787.
10
Combining diagnostic test results to increase accuracy.结合诊断测试结果以提高准确性。
Biostatistics. 2000 Jun;1(2):123-40. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/1.2.123.