Paliwal Priya, Ali Sarah, Bradshaw Sally, Hughes Alison, Jolly Kate
Heartlands Hospital, Heart of England Foundation Trust, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham B9 5SS, UK.
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK.
Midwifery. 2014 Mar;30(3):282-8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
to audit clinical management of women with type III female genital mutilation (FGM) according to local guidelines. Secondary objectives were to describe the population that uses the service and compare obstetric outcomes of intrapartum deinfibulation and antenatal deinfibulation.
retrospective audit.
a hospital midwifery-led FGM specialist service in Birmingham, UK.
253 women with type III FGM who gave birth between January 2008 and December 2009 METHODS: retrospective case analysis using patient records.
proportion of women managed according to locally agreed criteria for the management of FGM; obstetric outcomes including perineal tears, episiotomy rates, estimated blood loss, infant APGAR scores and indications for caesarean section.
91 (36%) women booked into antenatal care after 16 weeks gestation. Only 26 (10.3%) were managed fully according to guidelines. The area with poorest performance was child protection, where the presence of normal genitalia was documented in only 52 (38.8%) of medical notes following birth of a female infant. The majority of women (214, 84.6%) had been deinfibulated in a previous pregnancy. Of the 39 infibulated at booking, only 9 (23.1%) were deinfibulated antenatally, the rest opted for intrapartum deinfibulation. Women who had intrapartum deinfibulation had a higher average blood loss and more tears than those deinfibulated antenatally, although this was not statistically significant.
alternative systems should be considered to improve documentation of child protection related information. Further research is needed to confirm or refute the adverse findings among those that delayed deinfibulation.
根据当地指南审核III型女性生殖器切割(FGM)女性的临床管理情况。次要目的是描述使用该服务的人群,并比较分娩时解除阴部扣锁术和产前解除阴部扣锁术的产科结局。
回顾性审核。
英国伯明翰一家由助产士主导的FGM专科医院服务机构。
2008年1月至2009年12月期间分娩的253例III型FGM女性
使用患者记录进行回顾性病例分析。
按照当地商定的FGM管理标准进行管理的女性比例;产科结局,包括会阴撕裂、会阴切开率、估计失血量、婴儿阿氏评分和剖宫产指征。
91例(36%)女性在妊娠16周后登记进行产前护理。只有26例(10.3%)完全按照指南进行管理。表现最差的领域是儿童保护,在女婴出生后的病历中,只有52例(38.8%)记录有正常生殖器。大多数女性(214例,84.6%)在前次妊娠时已解除阴部扣锁术。在登记时仍为阴部扣锁的39例中,只有9例(23.1%)在产前解除扣锁,其余选择在分娩时解除扣锁。与产前解除扣锁的女性相比,分娩时解除扣锁的女性平均失血量更多,撕裂更多,尽管这在统计学上无显著差异。
应考虑采用其他系统来改善与儿童保护相关信息的记录。需要进一步研究来证实或反驳那些延迟解除扣锁术者的不良结局。