Kang Pauline, Fan Yvonne, Oh Kelly, Trac Kevin, Zhang Frank, Swarbrick Helen A
School of Optometry and Vision Science, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Jul;90(7):658-66. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182990878.
To compare changes in peripheral refraction with single-vision (SV) and multifocal (MF) correction of distance central refraction with commercially available SV and MF soft contact lenses (SCLs) in young myopic adults.
Thirty-four myopic adult subjects were fitted with Proclear Sphere and Proclear Multifocal SCLs to correct their manifest central refractive error. Central and peripheral refraction were measured with no lens wear and subsequently with the two different types of SCL correction.
At baseline, refraction was myopic at all locations along the horizontal meridian. Peripheral refraction was relatively hyperopic compared with center at 30 and 35 degrees in the temporal visual field (VF) in low myopes, and at 30 and 35 degrees in the temporal VF, and 10, 30, and 35 degrees in the nasal VF in moderate myopes. Single-vision and MF distance correction with Proclear Sphere and Proclear Multifocal SCLs, respectively, caused a hyperopic shift in refraction at all locations in the horizontal VF. Compared with SV correction, MF SCL correction caused a significant relative myopic shift at all locations in the nasal VF in both low and moderate myopes and also at 35 degrees in the temporal VF in moderate myopes.
Correction of central refractive error with SV and MF SCLs caused a hyperopic shift in both central and peripheral refraction at all positions in the horizontal meridian. Single-vision SCL correction caused the peripheral retina, which initially experienced absolute myopic defocus at baseline with no correction to experience an absolute hyperopic defocus. Multifocal SCL correction resulted in a relative myopic shift in peripheral refraction compared with SV SCL correction. This myopic shift may explain recent reports of reduced myopia progression rates with MF SCL correction.
比较使用市售单焦点(SV)和多焦点(MF)软性接触镜(SCL)对年轻近视成年人的远距离中央屈光不正进行单焦点和多焦点矫正时周边屈光的变化。
34名近视成年受试者佩戴宝睛润明单焦点和宝睛润明多焦点SCL以矫正其明显的中央屈光不正。在未佩戴镜片时以及随后使用两种不同类型的SCL矫正时测量中央和周边屈光。
在基线时,沿水平子午线的所有位置屈光均为近视。与低度数近视者颞侧视野(VF)中30度和35度处的中心相比,周边屈光相对远视;与中度近视者颞侧VF中30度和35度处以及鼻侧VF中10度、30度和35度处的中心相比,周边屈光相对远视。分别使用宝睛润明单焦点和宝睛润明多焦点SCL进行单焦点和MF远距离矫正,导致水平VF中所有位置的屈光出现远视性偏移。与SV矫正相比,MF SCL矫正使低度数和中度近视者鼻侧VF中所有位置以及中度近视者颞侧VF中35度处出现明显的相对近视性偏移。
使用SV和MF SCL矫正中央屈光不正会导致水平子午线所有位置的中央和周边屈光出现远视性偏移。单焦点SCL矫正使周边视网膜(在基线未矫正时最初经历绝对近视性离焦)经历绝对远视性离焦。与SV SCL矫正相比,多焦点SCL矫正导致周边屈光出现相对近视性偏移。这种近视性偏移可能解释了近期关于多焦点SCL矫正使近视进展率降低的报道。