Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University, De Boelelaan 1087, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Chemosphere. 2013 Sep;93(1):107-14. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.04.095. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
The extent to which chemical stressors affect primary producers in estuarine and coastal waters is largely unknown. However, given the large number of legacy pollutants and chemicals of emerging concern present in the environment, this is an important and relevant issue that requires further study. The purpose of our study was to extract and identify compounds which are inhibitors of photosystem II activity in microalgae from estuarine and coastal waters. Field sampling was conducted in the Western Scheldt estuary (Hansweert, The Netherlands). We compared four different commonly used extraction methods: passive sampling with silicone rubber sheets, polar organic integrative samplers (POCIS) and spot water sampling using two different solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridges. Toxic effects of extracts prepared from spot water samples and passive samplers were determined in the Pulse Amplitude Modulation (PAM) fluorometry bioassay. With target chemical analysis using LC-MS and GC-MS, a set of PAHs, PCBs and pesticides was determined in field samples. These compound classes are listed as priority substances for the marine environment by the OSPAR convention. In addition, recovery experiments with both SPE cartridges were performed to evaluate the extraction suitability of these methods. Passive sampling using silicone rubber sheets and POCIS can be applied to determine compounds with different structures and polarities for further identification and determination of toxic pressure on primary producers. The added value of SPE lies in its suitability for quantitative analysis; calibration of passive samplers still needs further investigation for quantification of field concentrations of contaminants.
化学胁迫物在河口和沿海水域中对初级生产者的影响程度在很大程度上是未知的。然而,鉴于环境中存在大量的遗留污染物和新兴关注的化学物质,这是一个需要进一步研究的重要而相关的问题。我们的研究目的是从河口和沿海水域中提取和鉴定抑制微藻光合作用系统 II 活性的化合物。现场采样在荷兰西部 Scheldt 河口(Hansweert)进行。我们比较了四种常用的提取方法:用硅橡胶片进行被动采样、极性有机整合采样器(POCIS)和使用两种不同固相萃取(SPE)小柱的点水采样。用脉冲幅度调制(PAM)荧光光度法生物测定法测定了从点水样品和被动采样器中提取的提取物的毒性效应。使用 LC-MS 和 GC-MS 进行目标化学分析,确定了现场样品中一组多环芳烃、多氯联苯和农药。这些化合物类别被 OSPAR 公约列为海洋环境的优先物质。此外,还进行了两种 SPE 小柱的回收实验,以评估这些方法的提取适用性。使用硅橡胶片和 POCIS 的被动采样可用于确定具有不同结构和极性的化合物,以进一步鉴定和确定对初级生产者的毒性压力。SPE 的附加值在于其适用于定量分析;被动采样器的校准仍需要进一步研究,以量化现场污染物浓度。