Suppr超能文献

情绪分心对工作记忆和情景记忆的相反影响的神经相关因素:一项基于事件的 fMRI 研究。

Neural correlates of opposing effects of emotional distraction on working memory and episodic memory: an event-related FMRI investigation.

机构信息

Psychology Department, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , Urbana, IL , USA ; Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , Urbana, IL , USA ; Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , Urbana, IL , USA.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 6;4:293. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00293. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

A fundamental question in the emotional memory literature is why emotion enhances memory in some conditions but disrupts memory in other conditions. For example, separate studies have shown that emotional stimuli tend to be better remembered in long-term episodic memory (EM), whereas emotional distracters tend to impair working memory (WM) maintenance. The first goal of this study was to directly compare the neural correlates of EM enhancement (EME) and WM impairing (WMI) effects, and the second goal was to explore individual differences in these mechanisms. During event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), participants maintained faces in WM while being distracted by emotional or neutral pictures presented during the delay period. EM for the distracting pictures was tested after scanning and was used to identify successful encoding activity for the picture distracters. The first goal yielded two findings: (1) emotional pictures that disrupted face WM but enhanced subsequent EM were associated with increased amygdala (AMY) and hippocampal activity (ventral system) coupled with reduced dorsolateral PFC (dlPFC) activity (dorsal system); (2) trials in which emotion enhanced EM without disrupting WM were associated with increased ventrolateral PFC activity. The ventral-dorsal switch can explain EME and WMI, while the ventrolateral PFC effect suggests a coping mechanism. The second goal yielded two additional findings: (3) participants who were more susceptible to WMI showed greater amygdala increases and PFC reductions; (4) AMY activity increased and dlPFC activity decreased with measures of attentional impulsivity. Taken together, these results clarify the mechanisms linking the enhancing and impairing effects of emotion on memory, and provide insights into the role of individual differences in the impact of emotional distraction.

摘要

情感记忆文献中的一个基本问题是,为什么情绪在某些条件下增强记忆,而在其他条件下却破坏记忆。例如,独立的研究表明,情绪刺激在长期情景记忆(EM)中往往更容易被记住,而情绪干扰物则往往会损害工作记忆(WM)的维持。本研究的第一个目标是直接比较 EM 增强(EME)和 WM 损害(WMI)效应的神经相关性,第二个目标是探索这些机制的个体差异。在事件相关功能磁共振成像(fMRI)期间,参与者在 WM 中保持面孔,同时被延迟期间呈现的情绪或中性图片分心。在扫描后测试分散图片的 EM,用于识别图片干扰物的成功编码活动。第一个目标产生了两个发现:(1)破坏面孔 WM 但增强随后 EM 的情绪图片与杏仁核(AMY)和海马体活动增加(腹侧系统)以及背外侧前额叶皮层(dlPFC)活动减少(背侧系统)相关;(2)情绪增强 EM 而不破坏 WM 的试验与腹外侧前额叶皮层活动增加相关。腹侧-背侧转换可以解释 EME 和 WMI,而腹外侧前额叶皮层的作用则表明了一种应对机制。第二个目标产生了另外两个发现:(3)更容易受到 WMI 影响的参与者表现出更大的杏仁核增加和 PFC 减少;(4)AMY 活动增加和 dlPFC 活动随着注意力冲动性的测量而减少。综上所述,这些结果阐明了将情绪对记忆的增强和损害效应联系起来的机制,并提供了对情绪干扰影响的个体差异的深入了解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b29/3674478/b7efb8b0627e/fpsyg-04-00293-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验